OpenAlex Citation Counts

OpenAlex Citations Logo

OpenAlex is a bibliographic catalogue of scientific papers, authors and institutions accessible in open access mode, named after the Library of Alexandria. It's citation coverage is excellent and I hope you will find utility in this listing of citing articles!

If you click the article title, you'll navigate to the article, as listed in CrossRef. If you click the Open Access links, you'll navigate to the "best Open Access location". Clicking the citation count will open this listing for that article. Lastly at the bottom of the page, you'll find basic pagination options.

Requested Article:

Ethical issues in reproductive genetic carrier screening
Lisa Dive, Ainsley J. Newson
The Medical Journal of Australia (2020) Vol. 214, Iss. 4, pp. 165-165
Open Access | Times Cited: 30

Showing 1-25 of 30 citing articles:

Nationwide, Couple-Based Genetic Carrier Screening
Edwin P. Kirk, Martin B. Delatycki, Alison D. Archibald, et al.
New England Journal of Medicine (2024) Vol. 391, Iss. 20, pp. 1877-1889
Closed Access | Times Cited: 12

The Australian Reproductive Genetic Carrier Screening Project (Mackenzie’s Mission): Design and Implementation
Alison D. Archibald, Belinda McClaren, Jade Caruana, et al.
Journal of Personalized Medicine (2022) Vol. 12, Iss. 11, pp. 1781-1781
Open Access | Times Cited: 37

Ethics of Reproductive Genetic Carrier Screening: From the Clinic to the Population
Lisa Dive, Ainsley J. Newson
Public Health Ethics (2021) Vol. 14, Iss. 2, pp. 202-217
Open Access | Times Cited: 29

Beyond severity: utility as a criterion for setting the scope of RGCS
Lisa Dive, Anne‐Marie Laberge, Lucinda Freeman, et al.
European Journal of Human Genetics (2024)
Open Access | Times Cited: 4

Reproductive carrier screening: responding to the eugenics critique
Lisa Dive, Ainsley J. Newson
Journal of Medical Ethics (2021) Vol. 48, Iss. 12, pp. 1060-1067
Open Access | Times Cited: 26

Ethical considerations in gene selection for reproductive carrier screening
Lisa Dive, Alison D. Archibald, Ainsley J. Newson
Human Genetics (2021) Vol. 141, Iss. 5, pp. 1003-1012
Open Access | Times Cited: 25

Economic evaluation of population-based, expanded reproductive carrier screening for genetic diseases in Australia
Deborah Schofield, Evelyn Lee, Jayamala Parmar, et al.
Genetics in Medicine (2023) Vol. 25, Iss. 5, pp. 100813-100813
Closed Access | Times Cited: 10

Societal implications of expanded universal carrier screening: a scoping review
Lieke M. van den Heuvel, Nina M. van den Berg, A. Cecile J.W. Janssens, et al.
European Journal of Human Genetics (2022) Vol. 31, Iss. 1, pp. 55-72
Open Access | Times Cited: 14

Western Australian women's expectations for expanded NIPT—An online survey regarding NIPT for single gene, recessive and chromosomal conditions
Sarah S. Long, Peter O’Leary, Jan E. Dickinson
Journal of Genetic Counseling (2023) Vol. 32, Iss. 5, pp. 1047-1056
Open Access | Times Cited: 8

Development and use of the Australian reproductive genetic carrier screening decision aid
Emily King, Jane Halliday, Alison D. Archibald, et al.
European Journal of Human Genetics (2021) Vol. 30, Iss. 2, pp. 194-202
Open Access | Times Cited: 18

Considering severity in the design of reproductive genetic carrier screening programs: screening for severe conditions
Lucinda Freeman, Alison D. Archibald, Lisa Dive, et al.
European Journal of Human Genetics (2024)
Open Access | Times Cited: 2

Views of patients and parents of children with genetic disorders on population‐based expanded carrier screening
Anke J. Woudstra, Lieke M. van den Heuvel, Elsbeth H. van Vliet‐Lachotzki, et al.
Prenatal Diagnosis (2022) Vol. 42, Iss. 9, pp. 1201-1210
Open Access | Times Cited: 10

Incorporating patient perspectives in the development of a core outcome set for reproductive genetic carrier screening: a sequential systematic review
Ebony Richardson, Alison McEwen, Toby Newton‐John, et al.
European Journal of Human Genetics (2022) Vol. 30, Iss. 7, pp. 756-765
Open Access | Times Cited: 9

Genetic Counselling Needs for Reproductive Genetic Carrier Screening: A Scoping Review
Samantha Edwards, Nigel G. Laing
Journal of Personalized Medicine (2022) Vol. 12, Iss. 10, pp. 1699-1699
Open Access | Times Cited: 8

Prospects of screening for carriers of hereditary diseases in pre-conception preparation programs
Е. V. Kudryavtseva, S. S. Deryabina, В. В. Ковалев, et al.
Russian Bulletin of Obstetrician-Gynecologist (2024) Vol. 24, Iss. 1, pp. 31-31
Closed Access | Times Cited: 1

Population-based genetic carrier screening. A consensus statement from the Spanish societies: AEGH, AEDP, ASEBIR, SEAGEN, SEF and SEGCD
Xavier Vendrell, Anna Abulí, Clara Serra, et al.
European Journal of Human Genetics (2024)
Closed Access | Times Cited: 1

Systematic review of outcomes in studies of reproductive genetic carrier screening: Towards development of a core outcome set
Ebony Richardson, Alison McEwen, Toby Newton‐John, et al.
Genetics in Medicine (2021) Vol. 24, Iss. 1, pp. 1-14
Closed Access | Times Cited: 8

Ethical aspects of the changing landscape for spinal muscular atrophy management in Australia
Ainsley J. Newson, Lisa Dive, Julie Cini, et al.
Australian Journal of General Practice (2022) Vol. 51, Iss. 3, pp. 131-135
Open Access | Times Cited: 6

Attitudes of professional stakeholders towards implementation of reproductive genetic carrier screening: a systematic review
Laurent Pasquier, Maryn Reyneke, Lauranne Beeckman, et al.
European Journal of Human Genetics (2023) Vol. 31, Iss. 4, pp. 395-408
Closed Access | Times Cited: 3

Intertwined Interests in Expanded Prenatal Genetic Testing: The State’s Role in Facilitating Equitable Access
Lisa Dive, Ainsley J. Newson, Isabella Holmes, et al.
The American Journal of Bioethics (2022) Vol. 22, Iss. 2, pp. 45-47
Closed Access | Times Cited: 5

Prenatal Screening and Counseling for Rare Genetic Disorders
K. Kumaran, Suruthi Abirami, Abna Ajeesh, et al.
(2024), pp. 61-76
Closed Access

Primary care professionals’ views on population-based expanded carrier screening: an online focus group study
Lieke M. van den Heuvel, Anke J. Woudstra, Sanne van der Hout, et al.
Family Practice (2023) Vol. 41, Iss. 4, pp. 571-578
Open Access | Times Cited: 1

NGS zur Selektion innovativer Therapien – Was bringt das?
Carla E. Schulmeyer, Simon Bader, H. Hübner, et al.
Der Gynäkologe (2021) Vol. 54, Iss. 3, pp. 164-174
Closed Access | Times Cited: 1

Page 1 - Next Page

Scroll to top