OpenAlex Citation Counts

OpenAlex Citations Logo

OpenAlex is a bibliographic catalogue of scientific papers, authors and institutions accessible in open access mode, named after the Library of Alexandria. It's citation coverage is excellent and I hope you will find utility in this listing of citing articles!

If you click the article title, you'll navigate to the article, as listed in CrossRef. If you click the Open Access links, you'll navigate to the "best Open Access location". Clicking the citation count will open this listing for that article. Lastly at the bottom of the page, you'll find basic pagination options.

Requested Article:

Frameworks used in invasion science: progress and prospects
John R. Wilson, Sven Bacher, Curtis C. Daehler, et al.
NeoBiota (2020) Vol. 62, pp. 1-30
Open Access | Times Cited: 24

Showing 24 citing articles:

A synthesis of biological invasion hypotheses associated with the introduction–naturalisation–invasion continuum
Ella Z. Daly, Olivier Chabrerie, François Massol, et al.
Oikos (2023) Vol. 2023, Iss. 5
Open Access | Times Cited: 79

Taming the terminological tempest in invasion science
Ismael Soto, Paride Balzani, Laís Carneiro, et al.
Biological reviews/Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society (2024) Vol. 99, Iss. 4, pp. 1357-1390
Open Access | Times Cited: 56

MAcroecological Framework for Invasive Aliens (MAFIA): disentangling large-scale context dependence in biological invasions
Petr Pyšek, Sven Bacher, Ingolf Kühn, et al.
NeoBiota (2020) Vol. 62, pp. 407-461
Open Access | Times Cited: 99

Consensus and controversy in the discipline of invasion science
Ross T. Shackleton, Giovanni Vimercati, Anna F. Probert, et al.
Conservation Biology (2022) Vol. 36, Iss. 5
Open Access | Times Cited: 33

A framework to integrate innovations in invasion science for proactive management
Charles B. van Rees, Brian K. Hand, Sean C. Carter, et al.
Biological reviews/Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society (2022) Vol. 97, Iss. 4, pp. 1712-1735
Closed Access | Times Cited: 30

Plant invasion risk inside and outside protected areas: Propagule pressure, abiotic and biotic factors definitively matter
Vanessa Lozano, Mirko Di Febbraro, Giuseppe Brundu, et al.
The Science of The Total Environment (2023) Vol. 877, pp. 162993-162993
Open Access | Times Cited: 17

Classifying the introduction pathways of alien species: are we moving in the right direction?
Katelyn T. Faulkner, Philip E. Hulme, Shyama Pagad, et al.
NeoBiota (2020) Vol. 62, pp. 143-159
Open Access | Times Cited: 46

Disentangling the relationships among abundance, invasiveness and invasibility in trait space
Cang Hui, Petr Pyšek, David M. Richardson
npj Biodiversity (2023) Vol. 2, Iss. 1
Open Access | Times Cited: 13

Taming the terminological tempest in invasion science
Ismael Soto, Paride Balzani, Laís Carneiro, et al.
(2023)
Open Access | Times Cited: 13

Quantifying uncertainty in forecasts of when and where invasions happen
Ariel Saffer, Chris Jones, Eli Horner, et al.
Biological Invasions (2025) Vol. 27, Iss. 4
Open Access

Some reflections on current invasion science and perspectives for an exciting future
Tina Heger, Jonathan M. Jeschke, Johannes Kollmann
NeoBiota (2021) Vol. 68, pp. 79-100
Open Access | Times Cited: 22

Harmonising the fields of invasion science and forest pathology
Trudy Paap, Michael J. Wingfield, Treena I. Burgess, et al.
NeoBiota (2020) Vol. 62, pp. 301-332
Open Access | Times Cited: 22

Biotic Threats to Cycas micronesica Continue to Expand to Complicate Conservation Decisions
Benjamin E. Deloso, L. Irene Terry, Lee S. Yudin, et al.
Insects (2020) Vol. 11, Iss. 12, pp. 888-888
Open Access | Times Cited: 20

Invading Ecological Networks
Cang Hui, David M. Richardson
(2022)
Open Access | Times Cited: 9

Trophic niche of an invasive generalist consumer: Australian redclaw crayfish,Cherax quadricarinatus, in the Inkomati River Basin, South Africa
Tsungai A. Zengeya, R. Lombard, Vhutali Ernest Nelwamondo, et al.
Austral Ecology (2022) Vol. 47, Iss. 7, pp. 1480-1494
Open Access | Times Cited: 9

Is invasion science moving towards agreed standards? The influence of selected frameworks
John R. Wilson, Arunava Datta, Heidi Hirsch, et al.
NeoBiota (2020) Vol. 62, pp. 569-590
Open Access | Times Cited: 14

AustralianAcaciaSpecies Around the World: Historical, Social, Evolutionary and Ecological Insights into One of the Planet’s Most Widespread Plant Genera
David M. Richardson, Elizabete Marchante, Johannes J. Le Roux
CABI eBooks (2023), pp. 1-26
Closed Access | Times Cited: 3

Addressing Climate Change: What Can Plant Invasion Science and Weed Science Learn From Each Other?
Yan Sun, Behnaz Pourmorad Kaleibar, Mostafa Oveisi, et al.
Frontiers in Agronomy (2021) Vol. 2
Open Access | Times Cited: 7

The Fluid Ubiquity of Food: Why Human Beings are Space–Time Cannibals
Mario Ricca
International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue internationale de Sémiotique juridique (2024)
Closed Access

A missing cog in the wheel: an Allee effects perspective in biological invasion paradigm
Kanhaiya Shah, Gyan Prakash Sharma
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment (2021) Vol. 194, Iss. 1
Closed Access | Times Cited: 2

Plant Invasions
Viktoria Wagner, David M. Richardson, Petr Pyšek
Elsevier eBooks (2023), pp. 680-695
Closed Access

Invasion Science 1.0
Cang Hui, David M. Richardson
Cambridge University Press eBooks (2022), pp. 1-49
Open Access

Preface
Cang Hui, David M. Richardson
(2022), pp. xi-xvi
Closed Access

Rethinking Invasibility
Cang Hui, David M. Richardson
Cambridge University Press eBooks (2022), pp. 370-404
Closed Access

Інвазійні чужорідні патогени як загроза глобальному біорізноманіттю
Iryna Matsiakh
Наукові праці Лісівничої академії наук України (2021), Iss. 22, pp. 11-26
Open Access

Page 1

Scroll to top