Open Access Helper

OpenAlex Citation Counts

OpenAlex Citations Logo

OpenAlex is a bibliographic catalogue of scientific papers, authors and institutions accessible in open access mode, named after the Library of Alexandria. It's citation coverage is excellent and I hope you will find utility in this listing of citing articles!

If you click the article title, you'll navigate to the article, as listed in CrossRef. If you click the Open Access links, you'll navigate to the "best Open Access location". Clicking the citation count will open this listing for that article. Lastly at the bottom of the page, you'll find basic pagination options.

Requested Article:

Moral foundations vignettes: a standardized stimulus database of scenarios based on moral foundations theory
Scott Clifford, V. Iyengar, Roberto Cabeza, et al.
Behavior Research Methods (2015) Vol. 47, Iss. 4, pp. 1178-1198
Open Access | Times Cited: 300

Showing 1-25 of 300 citing articles:

The Theory of Dyadic Morality: Reinventing Moral Judgment by Redefining Harm
Chelsea Schein, Kurt Gray
Personality and Social Psychology Review (2017) Vol. 22, Iss. 1, pp. 32-70
Closed Access | Times Cited: 513
Association of moral values with vaccine hesitancy
Avnika B. Amin, Robert A. Bednarczyk, Cara Ray, et al.
Nature Human Behaviour (2017) Vol. 1, Iss. 12, pp. 873-880
Closed Access | Times Cited: 322
No Harm in Checking: Using Factual Manipulation Checks to Assess Attentiveness in Experiments
John Kane, Jason Barabas
American Journal of Political Science (2018) Vol. 63, Iss. 1, pp. 234-249
Open Access | Times Cited: 213
Mapping morality with a compass: Testing the theory of ‘morality-as-cooperation’ with a new questionnaire
Oliver Scott Curry, Matthew Jones Chesters, Caspar J. Van Lissa
Journal of Research in Personality (2018) Vol. 78, pp. 106-124
Open Access | Times Cited: 192
Building Ethics into Artificial Intelligence
Han Yu, Zhiqi Shen, Chunyan Miao, et al.
(2018), pp. 5527-5533
Open Access | Times Cited: 173
Can AI language models replace human participants?
Danica Dillion, Niket Tandon, Yuling Gu, et al.
Trends in Cognitive Sciences (2023) Vol. 27, Iss. 7, pp. 597-600
Closed Access | Times Cited: 167
Purity homophily in social networks.
Morteza Dehghani, KATE JOHNSON, Joe Hoover, et al.
Journal of Experimental Psychology General (2016) Vol. 145, Iss. 3, pp. 366-375
Closed Access | Times Cited: 164
Impure or Just Weird? Scenario Sampling Bias Raises Questions About the Foundation of Morality
Kurt Gray, Jonathan E. Keeney
Social Psychological and Personality Science (2015) Vol. 6, Iss. 8, pp. 859-868
Closed Access | Times Cited: 144
The Moral Psychology of Raceless, Genderless Strangers
Neil Hester, Kurt Gray
Perspectives on Psychological Science (2020) Vol. 15, Iss. 2, pp. 216-230
Open Access | Times Cited: 115
Validation of the Moral Foundations Questionnaire in Turkey and its relation to cultural schemas of individualism and collectivism
Onurcan Yılmaz, Mehmet Harma, Hasan G. Bahçekapılı, et al.
Personality and Individual Differences (2016) Vol. 99, pp. 149-154
Closed Access | Times Cited: 114
Attitudes and Donation Behavior When Reading Positive and Negative Charity Appeals
Arvid Erlandsson, Artur Nilsson, Daniel Västfjäll
Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing (2018) Vol. 30, Iss. 4, pp. 444-474
Open Access | Times Cited: 114
Moral Decision Making Frameworks for Artificial Intelligence
Vincent Conitzer, Walter Sinnott‐Armstrong, Jana Schaich Borg, et al.
Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (2017) Vol. 31, Iss. 1
Open Access | Times Cited: 108
The Problem of Purity in Moral Psychology
Kurt Gray, Nicholas DiMaggio, Chelsea Schein, et al.
Personality and Social Psychology Review (2022) Vol. 27, Iss. 3, pp. 272-308
Open Access | Times Cited: 53
Moral disciplining: The cognitive and evolutionary foundations of puritanical morality
Léo Fitouchi, Jean‐Baptiste André, Nicolas Baumard
Behavioral and Brain Sciences (2022) Vol. 46
Open Access | Times Cited: 49
Morality Beyond the WEIRD: How the Nomological Network of Morality Varies Across Cultures
Mohammad Atari, Jonathan Haidt, Jesse Graham, et al.
(2022)
Open Access | Times Cited: 43
Grading by AI makes me feel fairer? How different evaluators affect college students’ perception of fairness
Fangyuan Chai, Jiajia Ma, Yi Wang, et al.
Frontiers in Psychology (2024) Vol. 15
Open Access | Times Cited: 14
AI language model rivals expert ethicist in perceived moral expertise
Danica Wilbanks, Debanjan Mondal, Niket Tandon, et al.
Scientific Reports (2025) Vol. 15, Iss. 1
Open Access | Times Cited: 1
Harm mediates the disgust-immorality link.
Chelsea Schein, Ryan S. Ritter, Kurt Gray
Emotion (2016) Vol. 16, Iss. 6, pp. 862-876
Closed Access | Times Cited: 81
Disgust sensitivity is primarily associated with purity-based moral judgments.
Fieke M. A. Wagemans, Mark J. Brandt, Marcel Zeelenberg
Emotion (2017) Vol. 18, Iss. 2, pp. 277-289
Open Access | Times Cited: 66
Individual Differences in Group Loyalty Predict Partisan Strength
Scott Clifford
Political Behavior (2016) Vol. 39, Iss. 3, pp. 531-552
Closed Access | Times Cited: 65
The what, how, and why of moralization: A review of current definitions, methods, and evidence in moralization research
Joshua J. Rhee, Chelsea Schein, Brock Bastian
Social and Personality Psychology Compass (2019) Vol. 13, Iss. 12
Closed Access | Times Cited: 64
Futuristic Autobiographies
EunJeong Cheon, Norman Makoto Su
(2018), pp. 388-397
Closed Access | Times Cited: 62
Text Analysis for Psychology: Methods, Principles, and Practices
Brendan Kennedy, Ashwini Ashokkumar, Ryan L. Boyd, et al.
(2021)
Open Access | Times Cited: 46
The Implications of Diverse Human Moral Foundations for Assessing the Ethicality of Artificial Intelligence
Jake Telkamp, Marc H. Anderson
Journal of Business Ethics (2022) Vol. 178, Iss. 4, pp. 961-976
Closed Access | Times Cited: 36
Large Language Models as Moral Experts? GPT-4o Outperforms Expert Ethicist in Providing Moral Guidance
Danica Wilbanks, Debanjan Mondal, Niket Tandon, et al.
(2024)
Open Access | Times Cited: 6
Page 1 - Next Page

Scroll to top