Open Access Helper

OpenAlex Citation Counts

OpenAlex Citations Logo

OpenAlex is a bibliographic catalogue of scientific papers, authors and institutions accessible in open access mode, named after the Library of Alexandria. It's citation coverage is excellent and I hope you will find utility in this listing of citing articles!

If you click the article title, you'll navigate to the article, as listed in CrossRef. If you click the Open Access links, you'll navigate to the "best Open Access location". Clicking the citation count will open this listing for that article. Lastly at the bottom of the page, you'll find basic pagination options.

Requested Article:

Another chance for good reasoning
Stefania Pighin, Katya Tentori, Vittorio Girotto
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review (2017) Vol. 24, Iss. 6, pp. 1995-2002
Open Access | Times Cited: 12

Showing 12 citing articles:

Cognitive reflection, visuospatial ability, and other measures as predictors of Bayesian reasoning
Gary L. Brase
Thinking & Reasoning (2025), pp. 1-17
Closed Access
From reading numbers to seeing ratios: a benefit of icons for risk comprehension
Elisabet Tubau, Javier Rodríguez‐Ferreiro, Itxaso Barberia, et al.
Psychological Research (2018) Vol. 83, Iss. 8, pp. 1808-1816
Closed Access | Times Cited: 27
Children’s quantitative Bayesian inferences from natural frequencies and number of chances
Stefania Pighin, Vittorio Girotto, Katya Tentori
Cognition (2017) Vol. 168, pp. 164-175
Open Access | Times Cited: 10
Fostering the Understanding of Positive Test Results
Stefania Pighin, Katya Tentori, Lucia Savadori, et al.
Annals of Behavioral Medicine (2018) Vol. 52, Iss. 11, pp. 909-919
Closed Access | Times Cited: 9
What facilitates Bayesian reasoning? A crucial test of ecological rationality versus nested sets hypotheses
Gary L. Brase
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review (2020) Vol. 28, Iss. 2, pp. 703-709
Open Access | Times Cited: 7
Processing Probability Information in Nonnumerical Settings – Teachers’ Bayesian and Non-bayesian Strategies During Diagnostic Judgment
Timo Leuders, Katharina Loibl
Frontiers in Psychology (2020) Vol. 11
Open Access | Times Cited: 6
Why can it be so hard to solve Bayesian problems? Moving from number comprehension to relational reasoning demands
Elisabet Tubau
Thinking & Reasoning (2021) Vol. 28, Iss. 4, pp. 605-624
Closed Access | Times Cited: 4
The impact of problem domain on Bayesian inferences: A systematic investigation
Stefania Pighin, Flavia Filimon, Katya Tentori
Memory & Cognition (2024) Vol. 52, Iss. 4, pp. 735-751
Open Access
When intuitive Bayesians need to be good readers: The problem-wording effect on Bayesian reasoning
Miroslav Sirota, Gorka Navarrete, Marie Juanchich
Cognition (2024) Vol. 245, pp. 105722-105722
Open Access
(Yet) Another chance for good reasoning? A commentary and reply on Pighin, Tentori, and Girotto (2017)
Gary L. Brase, Stefania Pighin, Katya Tentori
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review (2017) Vol. 25, Iss. 3, pp. 1220-1223
Open Access | Times Cited: 3
Sleeping Beauty Goes to the Lab: The Psychology of Self-Locating Evidence
Matteo Colombo, Jun Lai, Vincenzo Crupi
Review of Philosophy and Psychology (2018) Vol. 10, Iss. 1, pp. 173-185
Closed Access
The evolutionary roots of intuitive statistics
Johanna Eckert
(2018)
Open Access
Page 1

Scroll to top