Open Access Helper

OpenAlex Citation Counts

OpenAlex Citations Logo

OpenAlex is a bibliographic catalogue of scientific papers, authors and institutions accessible in open access mode, named after the Library of Alexandria. It's citation coverage is excellent and I hope you will find utility in this listing of citing articles!

If you click the article title, you'll navigate to the article, as listed in CrossRef. If you click the Open Access links, you'll navigate to the "best Open Access location". Clicking the citation count will open this listing for that article. Lastly at the bottom of the page, you'll find basic pagination options.

Requested Article:

MiDAS ENCORE: Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial Report of 6-Month Results
Peter S. Staats
Pain Physician (2016) Vol. 19, Iss. 2;2, pp. 25-37
Open Access | Times Cited: 20

Showing 20 citing articles:

The Effectiveness and Risks of Fluoroscopically Guided Lumbar Interlaminar Epidural Steroid Injections: A Systematic Review with Comprehensive Analysis of the Published Data
Anil Kumar Sharma, Yakov Vorobeychik, Ronald A. Wasserman, et al.
Pain Medicine (2016), pp. pnw131-pnw131
Open Access | Times Cited: 101
The MIST Guidelines: The Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Consensus Group Guidelines for Minimally Invasive Spine Treatment
Timothy R. Deer, Jay S. Grider, Jason E. Pope, et al.
Pain Practice (2018) Vol. 19, Iss. 3, pp. 250-274
Closed Access | Times Cited: 62
Defining the Primary Outcomes and Justifying Secondary Outcomes of a Study: Usually, the Fewer, the Better
Thomas R. Vetter, Edward J. Mascha
Anesthesia & Analgesia (2017) Vol. 125, Iss. 2, pp. 678-681
Closed Access | Times Cited: 58
MILD® is an Effective Treatment for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis with Neurogenic Claudication: MiDAS ENCORE Randomized Controlled Trial
Ramsin Benyamin
Pain Physician (2016) Vol. 4;19, Iss. 4;5, pp. 229-242
Open Access | Times Cited: 54
Best Practices for Minimally Invasive Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Treatment 2.0 (MIST): Consensus Guidance from the American Society of Pain and Neuroscience (ASPN)
Timothy R. Deer, Jay S. Grider, Jason E. Pope, et al.
Journal of Pain Research (2022) Vol. Volume 15, pp. 1325-1354
Open Access | Times Cited: 25
The Effectiveness and Risks of Non–Image-Guided Lumbar Interlaminar Epidural Steroid Injections: A Systematic Review with Comprehensive Analysis of the Published Data
Yakov Vorobeychik, Anil Kumar Sharma, Clark C Smith, et al.
Pain Medicine (2016) Vol. 17, Iss. 12, pp. 2185-2202
Open Access | Times Cited: 38
Long-Term Safety and Efficacy of Minimally Invasive Lumbar Decompression Procedure for the Treatment of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis With Neurogenic Claudication
Peter S. Staats, Timothy B. Chafin, Stanley Golovac, et al.
Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine (2018), pp. 1-1
Open Access | Times Cited: 29
Decompression Surgery versus Interspinous Devices for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Systematic Review of the Literature
Jennifer Tram, Shanmukha Srinivas, Arvin R. Wali, et al.
Asian Spine Journal (2020) Vol. 14, Iss. 4, pp. 526-542
Open Access | Times Cited: 17
The MOTION Study: A Randomized Controlled Trial with Objective Real-World Outcomes for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Patients Treated with the mild® Procedure: One-Year Results
Timothy R. Deer, Shrif Costandi, Edward P. Washabaugh, et al.
Pain Medicine (2022) Vol. 23, Iss. 4, pp. 625-634
Open Access | Times Cited: 10
Objective Real-World Outcomes of Patients Suffering from Painful Neurogenic Claudication Treated with the mild® Procedure: Interim 6-Month Report of a Randomized Controlled Trial
Timothy R. Deer, Christopher Kim, Sayed Wahezi, et al.
Journal of Pain Research (2021) Vol. Volume 14, pp. 1687-1697
Open Access | Times Cited: 10
Lumbar Spinal Stenosis and Minimally Invasive Lumbar Decompression: A Narrative Review
Hong-Jie Yuan, Xiaobin Yi
Journal of Pain Research (2023) Vol. Volume 16, pp. 3707-3724
Open Access | Times Cited: 3
Innovations in interventional pain management of chronic spinal pain
Laxmaiah Manchikanti, Mark V. Boswell, Joshua A Hirsch
Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics (2016) Vol. 16, Iss. 9, pp. 1033-1042
Closed Access | Times Cited: 8
A Retrospective, Single-Center, Quantitative Analysis of Adverse Events in Patients Undergoing Spinal Stenosis with Neurogenic Claudication Using a Novel Percutaneous Direct Lumbar Decompression Strategy
Jason E. Pope, Timothy R. Deer, Steven Falowski
Journal of Pain Research (2021) Vol. Volume 14, pp. 1909-1913
Open Access | Times Cited: 7
The MOTION study: Two‐year results of a real‐world randomized controlled trial of the mild® procedure for treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis
Timothy R. Deer, Timothy B. Chafin, Shrif Costandi, et al.
Pain Practice (2023)
Open Access | Times Cited: 2
Percutaneous Image-Guided Lumbar Decompression
Peter S. Staats, Sean Li, Stanley Golovac, et al.
Springer eBooks (2024), pp. 517-527
Closed Access
Percutaneous Interlaminar Lumbar decompression (PILD)
Navdeep Jassal, Ryan Budwany, Stanley Golovac, et al.
Elsevier eBooks (2024), pp. 141-150
Closed Access
Novel Technologies in Interventional Pain Management
Yashar Eshraghi, Jay Shah, Maged Guirguis
Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Clinics of North America (2022) Vol. 33, Iss. 2, pp. 533-552
Closed Access | Times Cited: 2
Spinal Cord Stimulation, MILD Procedure, and Regenerative Medicine, Novel Interventional Nonopioid Therapies in Chronic Pain
Ken P. Ehrhardt, Susan M. Mothersele, Andrew J. Brunk, et al.
Current Pain and Headache Reports (2018) Vol. 22, Iss. 4
Closed Access | Times Cited: 1
Minimally invasive lumbar decompression
Ryan Budwany, Yeshvant Navalgund
Elsevier eBooks (2023), pp. 54-61
Closed Access
Patient and physician radiation exposure during minimally invasive lumbar decompression: A prospective assessment of X‐ray exposure risks
Nagy Mekhail, Krista Topalsky, Erin Templeton, et al.
Pain Practice (2023) Vol. 24, Iss. 4, pp. 600-608
Open Access
Page 1

Scroll to top