Open Access Helper

OpenAlex Citation Counts

OpenAlex Citations Logo

OpenAlex is a bibliographic catalogue of scientific papers, authors and institutions accessible in open access mode, named after the Library of Alexandria. It's citation coverage is excellent and I hope you will find utility in this listing of citing articles!

If you click the article title, you'll navigate to the article, as listed in CrossRef. If you click the Open Access links, you'll navigate to the "best Open Access location". Clicking the citation count will open this listing for that article. Lastly at the bottom of the page, you'll find basic pagination options.

Requested Article:

Consumer Valuation of and Attitudes towards Novel Foods Produced with New Plant Engineering Techniques: A Review
John C. Beghin, Christopher R. Gustafson
Sustainability (2021) Vol. 13, Iss. 20, pp. 11348-11348
Open Access | Times Cited: 47

Showing 1-25 of 47 citing articles:

Understanding bark beetle outbreaks: exploring the impact of changing temperature regimes, droughts, forest structure, and prospects for future forest pest management
Vivek Vikram Singh, Aisha Naseer, Kanakachari Mogilicherla, et al.
Reviews in Environmental Science and Bio/Technology (2024) Vol. 23, Iss. 2, pp. 257-290
Open Access | Times Cited: 17
CRISPR/Cas- and Topical RNAi-Based Technologies for Crop Management and Improvement: Reviewing the Risk Assessment and Challenges Towards a More Sustainable Agriculture
Fabiano Touzdjian Pinheiro Kohlrausch Távora, Francisco de Assis dos Santos Diniz, Camila de Moraes Rêgo-Machado, et al.
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology (2022) Vol. 10
Open Access | Times Cited: 32
Genome-edited versus genetically-modified tomatoes: an experiment on people’s perceptions and acceptance of food biotechnology in the UK and Switzerland
Angela Bearth, Gülbanu Kaptan, Sabrina Heike Kessler
Agriculture and Human Values (2022) Vol. 39, Iss. 3, pp. 1117-1131
Open Access | Times Cited: 31
Societal perceptions and attitudes towards genetically modified (GM) crops, feed, and food products in the Middle East, North Africa, and Turkey (MENAT) region: A systematic literature review
Khalid Ramadan Medani, Alexandra Neill, Guy Garrod, et al.
Food Quality and Preference (2024) Vol. 117, pp. 105148-105148
Open Access | Times Cited: 7
Towards social acceptability of genome-edited plants in industrialised countries? Emerging evidence from Europe, United States, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, and Japan
Armin Spök, Thorben Sprink, Andrew C. Allan, et al.
Frontiers in Genome Editing (2022) Vol. 4
Open Access | Times Cited: 26
Advancing genome editing to improve the sustainability and resiliency of animal agriculture
Diane Wray‐Cahen, Anastasia Bodnar, Caird E. Rexroad, et al.
CABI Agriculture and Bioscience (2022) Vol. 3, Iss. 1
Open Access | Times Cited: 23
Precision genome editing of crops for improved disease resistance
Julian R. Greenwood, Xiaoxiao Zhang, John P. Rathjen
Current Biology (2023) Vol. 33, Iss. 11, pp. R650-R657
Open Access | Times Cited: 14
Gene‐Edited Food Adoption Intentions and Institutional Trust in the United States: Benefits, Acceptance, and Labeling☆
Sonja Lindberg, David J. Peters, Christopher Cummings
Rural Sociology (2023) Vol. 88, Iss. 2, pp. 392-425
Open Access | Times Cited: 13
A systematic review on public perceptions of RNAi-based biopesticides: Developing Social Licence to Operate
Raquel Tardin, Stephen J. Fletcher, Narelle Manzie, et al.
npj Sustainable Agriculture (2025) Vol. 3, Iss. 1
Open Access
Show me the benefits! Determinants of behavioral intentions towards CRISPR in the United States
Chad M. Baum, Carolin Kamrath, Stefanie Bröring, et al.
Food Quality and Preference (2023) Vol. 107, pp. 104842-104842
Open Access | Times Cited: 12
Gene editing in animals: What does the public want to know and what information do stakeholder organizations provide?
Christine Kuo, Katherine E. Koralesky, M.A.G. von Keyserlingk, et al.
Public Understanding of Science (2024) Vol. 33, Iss. 6, pp. 725-739
Open Access | Times Cited: 4
Towards production of genome‐edited aquaculture species
Eric M. Hallerman, Rex A. Dunham, Ross D. Houston, et al.
Reviews in Aquaculture (2022) Vol. 15, Iss. 2, pp. 404-408
Open Access | Times Cited: 16
Measuring specialty crop grower willingness to pay for genetic modification and genetic editing
Marie Abbey, Alan G. Smith, Chengyan Yue, et al.
Agribusiness (2024)
Open Access | Times Cited: 3
Navigating the Path from Lab to Market: Regulatory Challenges and Opportunities for Genome Editing Technologies for Agriculture
Mayla Daiane Corrêa Molinari, Renata Fuganti‐Pagliarini, Lílian H. Florentino, et al.
(2024), pp. 25-63
Closed Access | Times Cited: 3
European consumer and societal stakeholders' response to crop improvements and new plant breeding techniques
Abhishek Nair, A.R.H. Fischer, Silvana Moscatelli, et al.
Food and Energy Security (2022) Vol. 12, Iss. 1
Open Access | Times Cited: 15
Application of new breeding techniques in fruit trees
Manuela Campa, Simón Miranda, Concetta Licciardello, et al.
PLANT PHYSIOLOGY (2023)
Open Access | Times Cited: 8
Exploring the landscape of public attitudes towards gene-edited foods in Japan
Tomiko Yamaguchi, K Ezaki, Kyoko Ito
Breeding Science (2024) Vol. 74, Iss. 1, pp. 11-21
Open Access | Times Cited: 2
Consumer knowledge in marketing: a critical review and research agenda
Elisa Garrido-Castro, Francisco-José Torres-Peña, Eva-María Murgado-Armenteros, et al.
Spanish Journal of Marketing - ESIC (2024)
Open Access | Times Cited: 2
Impacts of growing and utilising genetically modified crops and forages – a New Zealand perspective
J. R. Caradus
New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research (2022) Vol. 66, Iss. 5, pp. 389-418
Open Access | Times Cited: 12
Public Perceptions of Risks and Benefits of Gene-edited Food Crops: An International Comparative Study between the US, Japan, and Germany
Naoko Kato-Nitta, Masashi Tachikawa, Yusuke Inagaki, et al.
Science Technology & Human Values (2022) Vol. 48, Iss. 6, pp. 1360-1392
Closed Access | Times Cited: 12
The socio-economic factors affecting the emergence and impacts of new genomic techniques in agriculture: A scoping review
Stephane Lemarié, Stéphan Marette
Trends in Food Science & Technology (2022) Vol. 129, pp. 38-48
Open Access | Times Cited: 11
Optimising commercial traits through gene editing in aquaculture: Strategies for accelerating genetic improvement
Megan Moran, David B. Jones, Sacha A. Jensen, et al.
Reviews in Aquaculture (2023) Vol. 16, Iss. 3, pp. 1127-1159
Open Access | Times Cited: 6
Perception and acceptance of robots in dairy farming—a cluster analysis of German citizens
Greta Langer, Sarah Kühl
Agriculture and Human Values (2023) Vol. 41, Iss. 1, pp. 249-267
Open Access | Times Cited: 5
Providing appropriate information to consumers boosts the acceptability of genome-edited foods in Japan
Chie Taguchi, Norihito Shibata, Keisuke Soga, et al.
GM crops & food (2023) Vol. 14, Iss. 1, pp. 1-14
Open Access | Times Cited: 4
Misconceptions Still Drive Citizens’ Scepticism Towards Biotechnologically Produced Food
Nico Spreen, Christoph Klimmt
Bulletin of Science Technology & Society (2024) Vol. 44, Iss. 1-2, pp. 33-43
Closed Access | Times Cited: 1
Page 1 - Next Page

Scroll to top