Open Access Helper

OpenAlex Citation Counts

OpenAlex Citations Logo

OpenAlex is a bibliographic catalogue of scientific papers, authors and institutions accessible in open access mode, named after the Library of Alexandria. It's citation coverage is excellent and I hope you will find utility in this listing of citing articles!

If you click the article title, you'll navigate to the article, as listed in CrossRef. If you click the Open Access links, you'll navigate to the "best Open Access location". Clicking the citation count will open this listing for that article. Lastly at the bottom of the page, you'll find basic pagination options.

Requested Article:

Many Labs 2: Investigating Variation in Replicability Across Sample and Setting
Richard Klein, Michelangelo Vianello, Fred Hasselman, et al.
(2018)
Open Access | Times Cited: 68

Showing 1-25 of 68 citing articles:

The Meaningfulness of Effect Sizes in Psychological Research: Differences Between Sub-Disciplines and the Impact of Potential Biases
Thomas Schäfer, Marcus Schwarz
Frontiers in Psychology (2019) Vol. 10
Open Access | Times Cited: 629
Many Labs 3: Evaluating participant pool quality across the academic semester via replication
Charles R. Ebersole, Olivia E. Atherton, Aimee L. Belanger, et al.
Journal of Experimental Social Psychology (2016) Vol. 67, pp. 68-82
Open Access | Times Cited: 425
Evaluating the replicability of social science experiments in Nature and Science between 2010 and 2015
Colin F. Camerer, Anna Dreber, Felix Holzmeister, et al.
(2018)
Open Access | Times Cited: 152
The Effect of Maternal Depression on Infant Attachment: A Systematic Review
Andrzej Śliwerski, Karolina Kossakowska, Karolina Jarecka, et al.
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (2020) Vol. 17, Iss. 8, pp. 2675-2675
Open Access | Times Cited: 123
Many Labs 3: Evaluating participant pool quality across the academic semester via replication
Charles R. Ebersole, Olivia E. Atherton, Aimee Lynn Belanger, et al.
(2016)
Open Access | Times Cited: 108
The Psychological Science Accelerator: Advancing Psychology through a Distributed Collaborative Network
Hannah Moshontz, Lorne Campbell, Charles R. Ebersole, et al.
(2018)
Open Access | Times Cited: 83
Distributed semantic representations for modeling human judgment
Sudeep Bhatia, Russell Richie, Wanling Zou
Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences (2019) Vol. 29, pp. 31-36
Open Access | Times Cited: 51
The intuitive cooperation hypothesis revisited: a meta-analytic examination of effect size and between-study heterogeneity
Amanda Kvarven, Eirik Strømland, Conny Wollbrant, et al.
Journal of the Economic Science Association (2020) Vol. 6, Iss. 1, pp. 26-42
Open Access | Times Cited: 43
Systematizing Confidence in Open Research and Evidence (SCORE)
Nazanin Alipourfard, Beatrix Arendt, D. M. Benjamin, et al.
(2021)
Open Access | Times Cited: 36
Two New Types of Manuscript Submissions: Registered Reports and Research to Practice
Nathan A. Stevenson, Aarti P. Bellara
Assessment for Effective Intervention (2025)
Closed Access
Open Science: What, Why, and How
Bobbie Spellman, Elizabeth Ann Gilbert, Katherine S. Corker
(2017)
Open Access | Times Cited: 46
The Brazilian Reproducibility Initiative
Olavo B. Amaral, Kleber Neves, Ana Paula Wasilewska‐Sampaio, et al.
eLife (2019) Vol. 8
Open Access | Times Cited: 37
Predicting replication outcomes in the Many Labs 2 study
Eskil Forsell, Domenico Viganola, Thomas Pfeiffer, et al.
(2018)
Open Access | Times Cited: 36
Scientific Utopia: III. Crowdsourcing Science
Eric Luis Uhlmann, Christopher R. Chartier, Charles R. Ebersole, et al.
(2018)
Open Access | Times Cited: 34
New Statistical Metrics for Multisite Replication Projects
Maya B Mathur, Tyler J. VanderWeele
Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A (Statistics in Society) (2020) Vol. 183, Iss. 3, pp. 1145-1166
Open Access | Times Cited: 29
Evidence against subliminal anchoring: Two close, highly powered, preregistered, and failed replication attempts
Lukas Röseler, Astrid Schütz, Pia A. Blank, et al.
Journal of Experimental Social Psychology (2020) Vol. 92, pp. 104066-104066
Open Access | Times Cited: 27
Psychometric Properties of the Turkish Version of the Interpersonal Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (IERQ)
Melisa Sevi Koç, Başak Türküler Aka, Burak Doğruyol, et al.
Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment (2019) Vol. 41, Iss. 2, pp. 294-303
Closed Access | Times Cited: 29
Exact replication: Foundation of science or game of chance?
Sophie K. Piper, Ulrike Grittner, André Rex, et al.
PLoS Biology (2019) Vol. 17, Iss. 4, pp. e3000188-e3000188
Open Access | Times Cited: 29
Standard experimental paradigm designs and data exclusion practices in cognitive psychology can inadvertently introduce systematic “shadow” biases in participant samples
Emma M. Siritzky, Patrick Cox, Sydni M. Nadler, et al.
Cognitive Research Principles and Implications (2023) Vol. 8, Iss. 1
Open Access | Times Cited: 8
The link between intuitive thinking and social conservatism is stronger in WEIRD societies
Onurcan Yılmaz, Sinan Alper
Judgment and Decision Making (2019) Vol. 14, Iss. 2, pp. 156-169
Open Access | Times Cited: 23
Improving Statistical Analysis in Team Science: The Case of a Bayesian Multiverse of Many Labs 4
Suzanne Hoogeveen, Sophie Wilhelmina Berkhout, Quentin F. Gronau, et al.
(2020)
Open Access | Times Cited: 21
Social identification and collective action participation in the internet age: A meta-analysis
Serap Akfırat, Mete Sefa Uysal, Fatih Bayrak, et al.
Cyberpsychology Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace (2021) Vol. 15, Iss. 4
Open Access | Times Cited: 18
Advantages Masquerading as ‘Issues’ in Bayesian Hypothesis Testing: A Commentary on Tendeiro and Kiers (2019)
Don van Ravenzwaaij, Eric‐Jan Wagenmakers
(2019)
Open Access | Times Cited: 20
Moral Foundations and Political Orientation: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
J. Matias Kivikangas, Belén Fernández, Simo Järvelä, et al.
(2020)
Closed Access | Times Cited: 18
The Intuitive Cooperation Hypothesis Revisited: A Meta-analytic Examination of Effect-size and Between-study Heterogeneity
Amanda Kvarven, Eirik Strømland, Conny Wollbrant, et al.
(2019)
Open Access | Times Cited: 19
Page 1 - Next Page

Scroll to top