Open Access Helper

OpenAlex Citation Counts

OpenAlex Citations Logo

OpenAlex is a bibliographic catalogue of scientific papers, authors and institutions accessible in open access mode, named after the Library of Alexandria. It's citation coverage is excellent and I hope you will find utility in this listing of citing articles!

If you click the article title, you'll navigate to the article, as listed in CrossRef. If you click the Open Access links, you'll navigate to the "best Open Access location". Clicking the citation count will open this listing for that article. Lastly at the bottom of the page, you'll find basic pagination options.

Requested Article:

Predicting replicability—Analysis of survey and prediction market data from large-scale forecasting projects
Michael Gordon, Domenico Viganola, Anna Dreber, et al.
PLoS ONE (2021) Vol. 16, Iss. 4, pp. e0248780-e0248780
Open Access | Times Cited: 34

Showing 1-25 of 34 citing articles:

A discipline-wide investigation of the replicability of Psychology papers over the past two decades
Wu Youyou, Yang Yang, Brian Uzzi
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (2023) Vol. 120, Iss. 6
Open Access | Times Cited: 60
The replication crisis has led to positive structural, procedural, and community changes
Max Korbmacher, Flávio Azevedo, Charlotte R. Pennington, et al.
Communications Psychology (2023) Vol. 1, Iss. 1
Open Access | Times Cited: 44
Replicability, Robustness, and Reproducibility in Psychological Science
Brian A. Nosek, Tom E Hardwicke, Hannah Moshontz, et al.
(2021)
Open Access | Times Cited: 88
Examining the generalizability of research findings from archival data
Andrew Delios, Elena Giulia Clemente, Tao Wu, et al.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (2022) Vol. 119, Iss. 30
Open Access | Times Cited: 37
Systematizing Confidence in Open Research and Evidence (SCORE)
Nazanin Alipourfard, Beatrix Arendt, D. M. Benjamin, et al.
(2021)
Open Access | Times Cited: 36
One Decade Into the Replication Crisis, How Have Psychological Results Changed?
Paul C. Bogdan
Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science (2025) Vol. 8, Iss. 2
Open Access
How Accurate are GPT-3’s Hypotheses About Social Science Phenomena?
Hannes Rosenbusch, Claire E. Stevenson, Han L. J. van der Maas
Deleted Journal (2023) Vol. 2, Iss. 2
Open Access | Times Cited: 10
Price formation in field prediction markets: The wisdom in the crowd
Frederik Bossaerts, Nitin Yadav, Peter Bossaerts, et al.
Journal of Financial Markets (2024) Vol. 68, pp. 100881-100881
Open Access | Times Cited: 3
Impression management attenuates the effect of ability on trust in economic exchange
Martin Reimann, Christoph Hüller, Oliver Schilke, et al.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (2022) Vol. 119, Iss. 30
Open Access | Times Cited: 10
Taking a Disagreeing Perspective Improves the Accuracy of People’s Quantitative Estimates
Philippe van de Calseyde, Emir Efendić
Psychological Science (2022) Vol. 33, Iss. 6, pp. 971-983
Open Access | Times Cited: 9
Forecasting the publication and citation outcomes of COVID-19 preprints
Michael Gordon, Michaël Bishop, Yiling Chen, et al.
Royal Society Open Science (2022) Vol. 9, Iss. 9
Open Access | Times Cited: 8
Forecasting migration movements using prediction markets
Sandra Morgenstern, Oliver Strijbis
Comparative Migration Studies (2024) Vol. 12, Iss. 1
Open Access | Times Cited: 1
Using prediction markets to predict the outcomes in the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency's next-generation social science programme
Domenico Viganola, Grant Buckles, Yiling Chen, et al.
Royal Society Open Science (2021) Vol. 8, Iss. 7, pp. 181308-181308
Open Access | Times Cited: 11
The replication crisis has led to positive structural, procedural, and community changes
Max Korbmacher, Flávio Azevedo, Charlotte R. Pennington, et al.
(2023)
Open Access | Times Cited: 4
Examining the replicability of online experiments selected by a decision market
Felix Holzmeister, Magnus Johannesson, Colin F. Camerer, et al.
Nature Human Behaviour (2024)
Open Access | Times Cited: 1
Establishing ground truth in the traumatic brain injury literature: if replication is the answer, then what are the questions?
Diana R Priestley, Jason Staph, Sai D Koneru, et al.
Brain Communications (2022) Vol. 5, Iss. 1
Open Access | Times Cited: 7
Predicting the replicability of social and behavioural science claims in COVID-19 preprints
Alexandru Marcoci, David P. Wilkinson, Anna Lou Abatayo, et al.
(2023)
Open Access | Times Cited: 3
Understanding and tackling the reproducibility crisis – Why we need to study scientists’ trust in data
Michael Calnan, Simon Kirchin, David L. Roberts, et al.
Pharmacological Research (2023) Vol. 199, pp. 107043-107043
Open Access | Times Cited: 2
A metric of knowledge as information compression reflects reproducibility predictions in biomedical experiments
Daniele Fanelli, Pedro Batista Tan, Olavo B. Amaral, et al.
(2022)
Open Access | Times Cited: 4
Attractiveness of the Megaproject Labor Market for Metropolitan Residents in the Context of Digitalization and the Long-Lasting COVID-19 Pandemic
Mikhail V. Vinichenko, С. А. Барков, Aleksander Oseev, et al.
International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications (2022) Vol. 13, Iss. 9
Open Access | Times Cited: 4
Can large language models help predict results from a complex behavioural science study?
Steffen Lippert, Anna Dreber, Magnus Johannesson, et al.
Royal Society Open Science (2024) Vol. 11, Iss. 9
Open Access
Natural Language Processing of Structured Text Elicitations Around the Replicability of Scientific Claims
Samer Atshan, Carlos Calvo-Hernandez, Tim Gulden, et al.
Springer proceedings in complexity (2024), pp. 300-313
Closed Access
Predicting the replicability of social and behavioural science claims in COVID-19 preprints
Alexandru Marcoci, David P. Wilkinson, Ans Vercammen, et al.
Nature Human Behaviour (2024)
Open Access
Machine learning augmentation reduces prediction error in collective forecasting: development and validation across prediction markets with application to COVID events
Alexander Gruen, Karl Mattingly, Ellen Morwitch, et al.
EBioMedicine (2023) Vol. 96, pp. 104783-104783
Open Access | Times Cited: 1
Using prediction markets to estimate ratings of academic research quality in a mock Research Excellence Framework exercise
Jacqueline Thompson, Anna Dreber, Tom R. Gaunt, et al.
(2022)
Open Access | Times Cited: 2
Page 1 - Next Page

Scroll to top