Open Access Helper

OpenAlex Citation Counts

OpenAlex Citations Logo

OpenAlex is a bibliographic catalogue of scientific papers, authors and institutions accessible in open access mode, named after the Library of Alexandria. It's citation coverage is excellent and I hope you will find utility in this listing of citing articles!

If you click the article title, you'll navigate to the article, as listed in CrossRef. If you click the Open Access links, you'll navigate to the "best Open Access location". Clicking the citation count will open this listing for that article. Lastly at the bottom of the page, you'll find basic pagination options.

Requested Article:

Using selfies to challenge public stereotypes of scientists
Paige B Jarreau, Imogene A. Cancellare, Becky J. Carmichael, et al.
PLoS ONE (2019) Vol. 14, Iss. 5, pp. e0216625-e0216625
Open Access | Times Cited: 66

Showing 1-25 of 66 citing articles:

Science Communication in Multiple Languages Is Critical to Its Effectiveness
Melissa C. Márquez, Ana Maria Porras
Frontiers in Communication (2020) Vol. 5
Open Access | Times Cited: 141
Public Acceptability of Gene Therapy and Gene Editing for Human Use: A Systematic Review
Juliette Delhove, Ivana Osenk, Ivanka Prichard, et al.
Human Gene Therapy (2019) Vol. 31, Iss. 1-2, pp. 20-46
Closed Access | Times Cited: 114
Reassessing the Variables Used to Measure Public Perceptions of Scientists
John C. Besley, Nicole Lee, Geah Pressgrove
Science Communication (2020) Vol. 43, Iss. 1, pp. 3-32
Closed Access | Times Cited: 108
Establishing Trust in Experts During a Crisis: Expert Trustworthiness and Media Use During the COVID-19 Pandemic
Sabina Mihelj, Katherine Kondor, Václav Štětka
Science Communication (2022) Vol. 44, Iss. 3, pp. 292-319
Open Access | Times Cited: 47
Using interpersonal communication strategies to encourage science conversations on social media
Curtis Martin, Bertrum H. MacDonald
PLoS ONE (2020) Vol. 15, Iss. 11, pp. e0241972-e0241972
Open Access | Times Cited: 63
Static vs. dynamic methods of delivery for science communication: A critical analysis of user engagement with science on social media
Sarah A. Habibi, Lidya Salim
PLoS ONE (2021) Vol. 16, Iss. 3, pp. e0248507-e0248507
Open Access | Times Cited: 52
Conspiracy beliefs and science rejection
Bastiaan T. Rutjens, Bojana Većkalov
Current Opinion in Psychology (2022) Vol. 46, pp. 101392-101392
Open Access | Times Cited: 32
Women Scientists on TikTok: New Opportunities to Become Visible and Challenge Gender Stereotypes
Brigitte Huber, Luis Quesada Baena
Media and Communication (2023) Vol. 11, Iss. 1, pp. 240-251
Open Access | Times Cited: 17
‘My doctor self and my human self’: A qualitative study of physicians' presentation of self on social media
Lauren A. Maggio, Lucía Céspedes, Alice Fleerackers, et al.
Medical Education (2024) Vol. 58, Iss. 10, pp. 1192-1204
Open Access | Times Cited: 7
Science public relations: The parallel, interwoven, and contrasting trajectories of public relations and science communication theory and practice
Matthew S. VanDyke, Nicole Lee
Public Relations Review (2020) Vol. 46, Iss. 4, pp. 101953-101953
Closed Access | Times Cited: 47
Family‐supportive supervisor behaviors (FSSB) and work‐family conflict: The role of stereotype content, supervisor gender, and gender role beliefs
Andrew Yu, Shaun Pichler, Marcello Russo, et al.
Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology (2021) Vol. 95, Iss. 2, pp. 275-304
Open Access | Times Cited: 34
Communicating biodiversity research on YouTube: An experimental comparison of scientists and third-party presenters
Selina A. Ruzi, Adrian A. Smith, Nicole Lee
Public Understanding of Science (2025)
Closed Access
How facial cues of streamers drive purchase intention in live streaming commerce: Based on a lens model
Zhang Yun, Xia Li, Liu Rong-qin, et al.
Journal of Business Research (2025) Vol. 190, pp. 115193-115193
Closed Access
When Scientists Share Their Struggles: How Scientists’ Self-Presentation on Social Media Influences Public Perceptions, Support for Science, and Information-Seeking Intentions
Annie L. Zhang, Hang Lu
Science Communication (2025)
Closed Access
Café com Ciência: o Instagram como ferramenta de divulgação científica
Renata Andrade Ávila, Bárbara Elisiário Oliveira, Maria Clara Landim Fabiano, et al.
Revista Guará (2025), Iss. 18
Closed Access
Why Are Scientific Experts Perceived as Trustworthy? Emotional Assessment within TV and YouTube Videos
Anne Reif, Tim Kneisel, Markus Schäfer, et al.
Media and Communication (2020) Vol. 8, Iss. 1, pp. 191-205
Open Access | Times Cited: 34
The effects of self-disclosure and gender on a climate scientist’s credibility and likability on social media
Nahyun Kim, Chris Skurka, Stephanie Madden
Public Understanding of Science (2024) Vol. 33, Iss. 6, pp. 692-708
Closed Access | Times Cited: 4
#WomenInSTEM: exploring self-presentation of identity on Instagram
Jocelyn Steinke, Amanda Coletti, Christine Gilbert
Journal of Science Communication (2024) Vol. 23, Iss. 01
Open Access | Times Cited: 4
Are scientists heroes or villains? The fascinating case of DC and Marvel superheroes comics
Alessandro Muscio, Matteo Farinella
Technology in Society (2025), pp. 102895-102895
Open Access
Social media for fisheries science and management professionals: How to use Bluesky and Instagram, and why you should
David S. Shiffman
Fisheries (2025)
Closed Access
Cultivating Authenticity as Role Models: Women in STEM Influencers on Instagram
Jocelyn Steinke, Katie Baumel, Meredith Turner
Science Communication (2024)
Closed Access | Times Cited: 3
The reward and risk of social media for academics
T. Ben Britton, Christopher Jackson, Jessica Wade
Nature Reviews Chemistry (2019) Vol. 3, Iss. 8, pp. 459-461
Open Access | Times Cited: 21
Diversifying Representations of Female Scientists on Social Media: A Case Study From the Women Doing Science Instagram
Alexandra A. Phillips, Catherine R. Walsh, Korie A. Grayson, et al.
Social Media + Society (2022) Vol. 8, Iss. 3
Open Access | Times Cited: 11
Competent and cold: a directed content analysis of warmth and competence dimensions to identify and categorise stereotypes of scientists portrayed in meme-based GIFs
Yujiro Fujiwara, Richard Carlos L. Velasco, Lee Jones, et al.
International Journal of Science Education (2022) Vol. 44, Iss. 4, pp. 694-715
Closed Access | Times Cited: 9
Engagement patterns with female and male scientists on Facebook
Keren Dalyot, Yael Rozenblum, Ayelet Baram‐Tsabari
Public Understanding of Science (2022) Vol. 31, Iss. 7, pp. 867-884
Open Access | Times Cited: 9
Page 1 - Next Page

Scroll to top