Open Access Helper

OpenAlex Citation Counts

OpenAlex Citations Logo

OpenAlex is a bibliographic catalogue of scientific papers, authors and institutions accessible in open access mode, named after the Library of Alexandria. It's citation coverage is excellent and I hope you will find utility in this listing of citing articles!

If you click the article title, you'll navigate to the article, as listed in CrossRef. If you click the Open Access links, you'll navigate to the "best Open Access location". Clicking the citation count will open this listing for that article. Lastly at the bottom of the page, you'll find basic pagination options.

Requested Article:

Reimagining peer review as an expert elicitation process
Alexandru Marcoci, Ans Vercammen, Martin Bush, et al.
BMC Research Notes (2022) Vol. 15, Iss. 1
Open Access | Times Cited: 15

Showing 15 citing articles:

Predicting reliability through structured expert elicitation with the repliCATS (Collaborative Assessments for Trustworthy Science) process
Hannah Fraser, Martin Bush, Bonnie C. Wintle, et al.
PLoS ONE (2023) Vol. 18, Iss. 1, pp. e0274429-e0274429
Open Access | Times Cited: 20
Predicting and reasoning about replicability using structured groups
Bonnie C. Wintle, Eden T. Smith, Martin Bush, et al.
Royal Society Open Science (2023) Vol. 10, Iss. 6
Open Access | Times Cited: 10
There is no easy fix to peer review but paying referees and regulating the number of submissions might help
Mohamed L. Seghier
F1000Research (2024) Vol. 13, pp. 439-439
Open Access | Times Cited: 3
Paying reviewers and regulating the number of papers may help fix the peer-review process
Mohamed L. Seghier
F1000Research (2024) Vol. 13, pp. 439-439
Open Access | Times Cited: 2
A toolkit for open and pluralistic conservation science
Mark A. Burgman, Rafael Morais Chiaravalloti, Fiona Fidler, et al.
Conservation Letters (2022) Vol. 16, Iss. 1
Open Access | Times Cited: 9
IDEAcology: An interface to streamline and facilitate efficient, rigorous expert elicitation in ecology
Stephanie Jones, Sonya R. Geange, Anca M. Hanea, et al.
Methods in Ecology and Evolution (2023) Vol. 14, Iss. 8, pp. 2019-2028
Open Access | Times Cited: 5
Readership Awareness Series - Paper 5: The Peer Review Process
Mohammad Javed Ali, Ali R. Djalilian
Seminars in Ophthalmology (2023) Vol. 38, Iss. 7, pp. 599-601
Open Access | Times Cited: 5
Elements of successful NIH grant applications
Houmam Araj, Leroy Worth, David T. Yeung
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (2024) Vol. 121, Iss. 15
Open Access | Times Cited: 1
Paying reviewers and regulating the number of papers may help fix the peer-review process
Mohamed L. Seghier
F1000Research (2024) Vol. 13, pp. 439-439
Open Access | Times Cited: 1
Readership awareness series - Paper 5: The peer review process
Mohammad Javed Ali, Ali R. Djalilian
The Ocular Surface (2023) Vol. 29, pp. 495-496
Closed Access | Times Cited: 2
The Peer Review Process - a Tutorial
Malene Roland Vils Pedersen, Albertina Rusandu, Audun Sanderud, et al.
Radiography Open (2024) Vol. 9, Iss. 1, pp. 76-83
Open Access
Predicting replicability of COVID-19 social science preprints

Nature Human Behaviour (2024)
Closed Access
Evaluating and Improving the Peer Review Process
Matthew Bennett
(2023), pp. 39-58
Closed Access
Science Evaluation: Peer Review, Bibliometrics, and Research Impact Assessment
Barbara K. Redman
Springer eBooks (2023), pp. 133-151
Closed Access
Maintaining Quality and Accuracy in Ophthalmology Academic Research: The Importance of Traditional Peer Review
Sunny Chi Lik Au
(2023), pp. 1-3
Open Access
Page 1

Scroll to top