Open Access Helper

OpenAlex Citation Counts

OpenAlex Citations Logo

OpenAlex is a bibliographic catalogue of scientific papers, authors and institutions accessible in open access mode, named after the Library of Alexandria. It's citation coverage is excellent and I hope you will find utility in this listing of citing articles!

If you click the article title, you'll navigate to the article, as listed in CrossRef. If you click the Open Access links, you'll navigate to the "best Open Access location". Clicking the citation count will open this listing for that article. Lastly at the bottom of the page, you'll find basic pagination options.

Requested Article:

What kind of systematic review should I conduct? A proposed typology and guidance for systematic reviewers in the medical and health sciences
Zachary Munn, Cindy Stern, Edoardo Aromataris, et al.
BMC Medical Research Methodology (2018) Vol. 18, Iss. 1
Open Access | Times Cited: 798

Showing 1-25 of 798 citing articles:

Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach
Zachary Munn, Micah D.J. Peters, Cindy Stern, et al.
BMC Medical Research Methodology (2018) Vol. 18, Iss. 1
Open Access | Times Cited: 7618
PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews
Matthew J. Page, David Moher, Patrick M. Bossuyt, et al.
BMJ (2021), pp. n160-n160
Open Access | Times Cited: 6351
Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews
Micah D.J. Peters, Casey Marnie, Andrea C. Tricco, et al.
JBI Evidence Synthesis (2020) Vol. 18, Iss. 10, pp. 2119-2126
Open Access | Times Cited: 3437
Methodological quality of case series studies
Zachary Munn, Timothy Hugh Barker, Sandeep Moola, et al.
The JBI Database of Systematic Reviews and Implementation Reports (2019) Vol. Publish Ahead of Print
Open Access | Times Cited: 865
The impact of patient, intervention, comparison, outcome (PICO) as a search strategy tool on literature search quality: a systematic review
Mette Brandt Eriksen, Tove Faber Frandsen
Journal of the Medical Library Association JMLA (2018) Vol. 106, Iss. 4
Open Access | Times Cited: 822
Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews
Micah D.J. Peters, Casey Marnie, Andrea C. Tricco, et al.
JBI Evidence Implementation (2021) Vol. 19, Iss. 1, pp. 3-10
Open Access | Times Cited: 808
The development of software to support multiple systematic review types
Zachary Munn, Edoardo Aromataris, Cătălin Tufănaru, et al.
International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare (2018) Vol. 17, Iss. 1, pp. 36-43
Closed Access | Times Cited: 664
The effects of integrated care: a systematic review of UK and international evidence
Susan Baxter, Maxine Johnson, Duncan Chambers, et al.
BMC Health Services Research (2018) Vol. 18, Iss. 1
Open Access | Times Cited: 509
Undertaking a scoping review: A practical guide for nursing and midwifery students, clinicians, researchers, and academics
Danielle Pollock, Ellen Davies, Micah D.J. Peters, et al.
Journal of Advanced Nursing (2021) Vol. 77, Iss. 4, pp. 2102-2113
Open Access | Times Cited: 446
Industry 4.0 and the circular economy: A literature review and recommendations for future research
Usama Awan, Robert Sroufe, Muhammad Saeed Shahbaz
Business Strategy and the Environment (2021) Vol. 30, Iss. 4, pp. 2038-2060
Closed Access | Times Cited: 410
Conducting proportional meta-analysis in different types of systematic reviews: a guide for synthesisers of evidence
Timothy Hugh Barker, Celina Borges Migliavaca, Cinara Stein, et al.
BMC Medical Research Methodology (2021) Vol. 21, Iss. 1
Open Access | Times Cited: 408
Meeting the review family: exploring review types and associated information retrieval requirements
Anthea Sutton, Mark Clowes, Louise Preston, et al.
Health Information & Libraries Journal (2019) Vol. 36, Iss. 3, pp. 202-222
Open Access | Times Cited: 371
What are scoping reviews? Providing a formal definition of scoping reviews as a type of evidence synthesis
Zachary Munn, Danielle Pollock, Hanan Khalil, et al.
JBI Evidence Synthesis (2022) Vol. 20, Iss. 4, pp. 950-952
Open Access | Times Cited: 332
Practical Guidance for Knowledge Synthesis: Scoping Review Methods
Craig Lockwood, Kelli Borges dos Santos, Robin Pap
Asian Nursing Research (2019) Vol. 13, Iss. 5, pp. 287-294
Open Access | Times Cited: 270
Implementing the 27 PRISMA 2020 Statement items for systematic reviews in the sport and exercise medicine, musculoskeletal rehabilitation and sports science fields: the PERSiST (implementing Prisma in Exercise, Rehabilitation, Sport medicine and SporTs science) guidance
Clare L. Ardern, Fionn Büttner, Renato Andrade, et al.
British Journal of Sports Medicine (2021) Vol. 56, Iss. 4, pp. 175-195
Open Access | Times Cited: 244
Systematic Literature Reviews: An Introduction
Guillaume Lamé
Proceedings of the ... International Conference on Engineering Design (2019) Vol. 1, Iss. 1, pp. 1633-1642
Open Access | Times Cited: 199
The Joanna Briggs Institute approach for systematic reviews
Wendel Mombaque dos Santos, Sílvia Regina Secoli, Vilanice Alves de Araújo Püschel
Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem (2018) Vol. 26
Open Access | Times Cited: 188
Nearly 80 systematic reviews were published each day: Observational study on trends in epidemiology and reporting over the years 2000-2019
Falk Hoffmann, Katharina Allers, Tanja Rombey, et al.
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology (2021) Vol. 138, pp. 1-11
Open Access | Times Cited: 163
Mapping reviews, scoping reviews, and evidence and gap maps (EGMs): the same but different— the “Big Picture” review family
Fiona Campbell, Andrea C. Tricco, Zachary Munn, et al.
Systematic Reviews (2023) Vol. 12, Iss. 1
Open Access | Times Cited: 120
Dangers and Benefits of Social Media on E-Professionalism of Health Care Professionals: Scoping Review
Tea Vukušić Rukavina, Joško Viskić, Lovela Machala Poplašen, et al.
Journal of Medical Internet Research (2021) Vol. 23, Iss. 11, pp. e25770-e25770
Open Access | Times Cited: 115
Wearing the Future—Wearables to Empower Users to Take Greater Responsibility for Their Health and Care: Scoping Review
Harjeevan Singh Kang, Mark Exworthy
JMIR mhealth and uhealth (2022) Vol. 10, Iss. 7, pp. e35684-e35684
Open Access | Times Cited: 107
Designing Value Chains for Industry 4.0 and a Circular Economy: A Review of the Literature
Usama Awan, Robert Sroufe, Karoly Bozan
Sustainability (2022) Vol. 14, Iss. 12, pp. 7084-7084
Open Access | Times Cited: 106
The revised JBI critical appraisal tool for the assessment of risk of bias for quasi-experimental studies
Timothy Hugh Barker, Nahal Habibi, Edoardo Aromataris, et al.
JBI Evidence Synthesis (2024) Vol. 22, Iss. 3, pp. 378-388
Open Access | Times Cited: 100
Barriers to high school and university students’ physical activity: A systematic review
Regina Márcia Ferreira Silva, Carolina Rodrigues Mendonça, Vinicius Diniz Azevedo, et al.
PLoS ONE (2022) Vol. 17, Iss. 4, pp. e0265913-e0265913
Open Access | Times Cited: 87
Assessing the risk of bias of quantitative analytical studies: introducing the vision for critical appraisal within JBI systematic reviews
Zachary Munn, Jennifer Stone, Edoardo Aromataris, et al.
JBI Evidence Synthesis (2022)
Open Access | Times Cited: 84
Page 1 - Next Page

Scroll to top