Open Access Helper

OpenAlex Citation Counts

OpenAlex Citations Logo

OpenAlex is a bibliographic catalogue of scientific papers, authors and institutions accessible in open access mode, named after the Library of Alexandria. It's citation coverage is excellent and I hope you will find utility in this listing of citing articles!

If you click the article title, you'll navigate to the article, as listed in CrossRef. If you click the Open Access links, you'll navigate to the "best Open Access location". Clicking the citation count will open this listing for that article. Lastly at the bottom of the page, you'll find basic pagination options.

Requested Article:

Process evaluations for cluster-randomised trials of complex interventions: a proposed framework for design and reporting
Aileen Grant, Shaun Treweek, Tobias Dreischulte, et al.
Trials (2013) Vol. 14, Iss. 1, pp. 15-15
Open Access | Times Cited: 439

Showing 1-25 of 439 citing articles:

Process evaluation of complex interventions: Medical Research Council guidance
Gary F. Moore, Suzanne Audrey, Mary Barker, et al.
BMJ (2015) Vol. 350, Iss. mar19 6, pp. h1258-h1258
Open Access | Times Cited: 4801
Interventions to improve antibiotic prescribing practices for hospital inpatients
Peter Davey, Erwin Brown, Esmita Charani, et al.
Cochrane database of systematic reviews (2013)
Open Access | Times Cited: 1718
Interventions to improve antibiotic prescribing practices for hospital inpatients
Peter Davey, Charis Marwick, Claire Scott, et al.
Cochrane library (2017) Vol. 2017, Iss. 2
Open Access | Times Cited: 962
Implementation, context and complexity
Carl May, Mark J. Johnson, Tracy Finch
Implementation Science (2016) Vol. 11, Iss. 1
Open Access | Times Cited: 715
Theory of Change: a theory-driven approach to enhance the Medical Research Council's framework for complex interventions
Mary J De Silva, Erica Breuer, Lucy Lee, et al.
Trials (2014) Vol. 15, Iss. 1
Open Access | Times Cited: 583
Framework for the development and evaluation of complex interventions: gap analysis, workshop and consultation-informed update
Kathryn Skivington, Lynsay Matthews, Sharon Simpson, et al.
Health Technology Assessment (2021) Vol. 25, Iss. 57, pp. 1-132
Open Access | Times Cited: 324
Process evaluation in complex public health intervention studies: the need for guidance
Simon Moore, Suzanne Audrey, Mary Barker, et al.
Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health (2013) Vol. 68, Iss. 2, pp. 101-102
Open Access | Times Cited: 313
Criteria for Reporting the Development and Evaluation of Complex Interventions in healthcare: revised guideline (CReDECI 2)
R. Albert Mohler, Sascha Köpke, Gabriele Meyer
Trials (2015) Vol. 16, Iss. 1
Open Access | Times Cited: 277
Standards for Reporting Implementation Studies (StaRI): explanation and elaboration document
Hilary Pinnock, Melanie Barwick, Christopher R. Carpenter, et al.
BMJ Open (2017) Vol. 7, Iss. 4, pp. e013318-e013318
Open Access | Times Cited: 242
Implementation and scale up of population physical activity interventions for clinical and community settings: the PRACTIS guide
Harriet Koorts, Elizabeth Eakin, Paul A. Estabrooks, et al.
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity (2018) Vol. 15, Iss. 1
Open Access | Times Cited: 226
Challenges, solutions and future directions in the evaluation of service innovations in health care and public health
Rosalind Raine, Ray Fitzpatrick, Helen Barratt, et al.
Health Services and Delivery Research (2016) Vol. 4, Iss. 16, pp. 1-136
Open Access | Times Cited: 172
Designing and undertaking randomised implementation trials: guide for researchers
Luke Wolfenden, Robbie Foy, Justin Presseau, et al.
BMJ (2021), pp. m3721-m3721
Open Access | Times Cited: 152
Context and implementation: A concept analysis towards conceptual maturity
Lisa M. Pfadenhauer, Kati Mozygemba, Ansgar Gerhardus, et al.
Zeitschrift für Evidenz Fortbildung und Qualität im Gesundheitswesen (2015) Vol. 109, Iss. 2, pp. 103-114
Open Access | Times Cited: 151
Identifying change processes in group-based health behaviour-change interventions: development of the mechanisms of action in group-based interventions (MAGI) framework
Aleksandra J. Borek, Charles Abraham, Colin Greaves, et al.
Health Psychology Review (2019) Vol. 13, Iss. 3, pp. 227-247
Open Access | Times Cited: 134
Evaluating the Impact of Physical Activity Apps and Wearables: Interdisciplinary Review
Claire McCallum, John Rooksby, Cindy M. Gray
JMIR mhealth and uhealth (2018) Vol. 6, Iss. 3, pp. e58-e58
Open Access | Times Cited: 122
Enhancing Reporting of Behavior Change Intervention Evaluations
Charles Abraham, Blair T. Johnson, Marijn de Bruin, et al.
JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes (2014) Vol. 66, Iss. Supplement 3, pp. S293-S299
Open Access | Times Cited: 116
Improving care at scale: process evaluation of a multi-component quality improvement intervention to reduce mortality after emergency abdominal surgery (EPOCH trial)
Tim Stephens, Carol J. Peden, Rupert M. Pearse, et al.
Implementation Science (2018) Vol. 13, Iss. 1
Open Access | Times Cited: 94
Taking account of context in systematic reviews and guidelines considering a complexity perspective
Andrew Booth, Graham Moore, Kate Flemming, et al.
BMJ Global Health (2019) Vol. 4, Iss. Suppl 1, pp. e000840-e000840
Open Access | Times Cited: 80
Pay for performance for hospitals
Tim Mathes, Dawid Pieper, Johannes Morche, et al.
Cochrane library (2019)
Open Access | Times Cited: 79
Designing and using incentives to support recruitment and retention in clinical trials: a scoping review and a checklist for design
Beth Parkinson, Rachel Meacock, Matt Sutton, et al.
Trials (2019) Vol. 20, Iss. 1
Open Access | Times Cited: 76
Process evaluation of school-based high-intensity interval training interventions for children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Yong Liu, Curtis A. Wadey, Alan R. Barker, et al.
BMC Public Health (2024) Vol. 24, Iss. 1
Open Access | Times Cited: 10
Getting added value from using qualitative research with randomized controlled trials: a qualitative interview study
Alicia O’Cathain, Jackie Goode, Sarah J Drabble, et al.
Trials (2014) Vol. 15, Iss. 1
Open Access | Times Cited: 94
Designing quality improvement initiatives: the action effect method, a structured approach to identifying and articulating programme theory
Julie Reed, C McNicholas, Thomas Woodcock, et al.
BMJ Quality & Safety (2014) Vol. 23, Iss. 12, pp. 1040-1048
Open Access | Times Cited: 91
Implementation of a self-management support approach (WISE) across a health system: a process evaluation explaining what did and did not work for organisations, clinicians and patients
Anne Kennedy, Anne Rogers, Carolyn Chew‐Graham, et al.
Implementation Science (2014) Vol. 9, Iss. 1
Open Access | Times Cited: 88
Implementing, embedding and integrating self-management support tools for people with long-term conditions in primary care nursing: A qualitative study
Anne Kennedy, Anne Rogers, Robert S. Bowen, et al.
International Journal of Nursing Studies (2013) Vol. 51, Iss. 8, pp. 1103-1113
Open Access | Times Cited: 87
Page 1 - Next Page

Scroll to top