OpenAlex Citation Counts

OpenAlex Citations Logo

OpenAlex is a bibliographic catalogue of scientific papers, authors and institutions accessible in open access mode, named after the Library of Alexandria. It's citation coverage is excellent and I hope you will find utility in this listing of citing articles!

If you click the article title, you'll navigate to the article, as listed in CrossRef. If you click the Open Access links, you'll navigate to the "best Open Access location". Clicking the citation count will open this listing for that article. Lastly at the bottom of the page, you'll find basic pagination options.

Requested Article:

Political Extremism Predicts Belief in Conspiracy Theories
Jan‐Willem van Prooijen, André Krouwel, Thomas V. Pollet
Social Psychological and Personality Science (2015) Vol. 6, Iss. 5, pp. 570-578
Closed Access | Times Cited: 518

Showing 1-25 of 518 citing articles:

Using social and behavioural science to support COVID-19 pandemic response
Jay Joseph Van Bavel, Katherine Baicker, Paulo S. Boggio, et al.
Nature Human Behaviour (2020) Vol. 4, Iss. 5, pp. 460-471
Open Access | Times Cited: 4399

Susceptibility to misinformation about COVID-19 around the world
Jon Roozenbeek, Claudia R. Schneider, Sarah Dryhurst, et al.
Royal Society Open Science (2020) Vol. 7, Iss. 10, pp. 201199-201199
Open Access | Times Cited: 1203

Understanding Conspiracy Theories
Karen M. Douglas, Joseph E. Uscinski, Robbie M. Sutton, et al.
Political Psychology (2019) Vol. 40, Iss. S1, pp. 3-35
Open Access | Times Cited: 1175

Coronavirus conspiracy beliefs, mistrust, and compliance with government guidelines in England
Daniel Freeman, Felicity Waite, Laina Rosebrock, et al.
Psychological Medicine (2020) Vol. 52, Iss. 2, pp. 251-263
Open Access | Times Cited: 421

Why Education Predicts Decreased Belief in Conspiracy Theories
Jan‐Willem van Prooijen
Applied Cognitive Psychology (2016) Vol. 31, Iss. 1, pp. 50-58
Open Access | Times Cited: 415

Belief in conspiracy theories: Basic principles of an emerging research domain
Jan‐Willem van Prooijen, Karen M. Douglas
European Journal of Social Psychology (2018) Vol. 48, Iss. 7, pp. 897-908
Open Access | Times Cited: 387

Motivated Rejection of Science
Stephan Lewandowsky, Klaus Oberauer
Current Directions in Psychological Science (2016) Vol. 25, Iss. 4, pp. 217-222
Open Access | Times Cited: 346

The Influence of Control on Belief in Conspiracy Theories: Conceptual and Applied Extensions
Jan‐Willem van Prooijen, Michele Acker
Applied Cognitive Psychology (2015) Vol. 29, Iss. 5, pp. 753-761
Closed Access | Times Cited: 327

Conspiracy Theories: Evolved Functions and Psychological Mechanisms
Jan‐Willem van Prooijen, Mark van Vugt
Perspectives on Psychological Science (2018) Vol. 13, Iss. 6, pp. 770-788
Open Access | Times Cited: 324

Connecting the dots: Illusory pattern perception predicts belief in conspiracies and the supernatural
Jan‐Willem van Prooijen, Karen M. Douglas, Clara De Inocencio
European Journal of Social Psychology (2017) Vol. 48, Iss. 3, pp. 320-335
Open Access | Times Cited: 291

COVID-19-related conspiracy beliefs and their relationship with perceived stress and pre-existing conspiracy beliefs
Neophytos Georgiou, Paul Delfabbro, Ryan Balzan
Personality and Individual Differences (2020) Vol. 166, pp. 110201-110201
Open Access | Times Cited: 273

The anti-vaccination infodemic on social media: A behavioral analysis
Federico Germani, Nikola Biller‐Andorno
PLoS ONE (2021) Vol. 16, Iss. 3, pp. e0247642-e0247642
Open Access | Times Cited: 269

‘They will not control us’: Ingroup positivity and belief in intergroup conspiracies
Aleksandra Cichocka, Marta Marchlewska, Agnieszka Golec de Zavala, et al.
British Journal of Psychology (2015) Vol. 107, Iss. 3, pp. 556-576
Closed Access | Times Cited: 261

Conspiracy mentality and political orientation across 26 countries
Roland Imhoff, Felix Zimmer, Olivier Klein, et al.
Nature Human Behaviour (2022) Vol. 6, Iss. 3, pp. 392-403
Open Access | Times Cited: 261

The Paranoid Style in American Politics Revisited: An Ideological Asymmetry in Conspiratorial Thinking
Sander van der Linden, Costas Panagopoulos, Flávio Azevedo, et al.
Political Psychology (2020) Vol. 42, Iss. 1, pp. 23-51
Open Access | Times Cited: 253

Sociodemographic and Psychological Correlates of Compliance with the COVID-19 Public Health Measures in France
Sylvain Brouard, Pavlos Vasilopoulos, Michael Becher
Canadian Journal of Political Science (2020) Vol. 53, Iss. 2, pp. 253-258
Open Access | Times Cited: 236

How paranoid are conspiracy believers? Toward a more fine‐grained understanding of the connect and disconnect between paranoia and belief in conspiracy theories
Roland Imhoff, Pia Lamberty
European Journal of Social Psychology (2018) Vol. 48, Iss. 7, pp. 909-926
Closed Access | Times Cited: 214

Conspiracy theories and the conspiracy mindset: implications for political ideology
Robbie M. Sutton, Karen M. Douglas
Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences (2020) Vol. 34, pp. 118-122
Open Access | Times Cited: 202

Epistemic rationality: Skepticism toward unfounded beliefs requires sufficient cognitive ability and motivation to be rational
Tomas Ståhl, Jan‐Willem van Prooijen
Personality and Individual Differences (2017) Vol. 122, pp. 155-163
Open Access | Times Cited: 199

An Existential Threat Model of Conspiracy Theories
Jan‐Willem van Prooijen
European Psychologist (2019) Vol. 25, Iss. 1, pp. 16-25
Open Access | Times Cited: 191

From populism to the “plandemic”: why populists believe in COVID-19 conspiracies
Jakob‐Moritz Eberl, Robert Huber, Esther Greussing
Journal of Elections Public Opinion and Parties (2021) Vol. 31, Iss. sup1, pp. 272-284
Open Access | Times Cited: 189

Psychological Features of Extreme Political Ideologies
Jan‐Willem van Prooijen, André Krouwel
Current Directions in Psychological Science (2019) Vol. 28, Iss. 2, pp. 159-163
Open Access | Times Cited: 176

The partisan mind: Is extreme political partisanship related to cognitive inflexibility?
Leor Zmigrod, Peter J. Rentfrow, Trevor W. Robbins
Journal of Experimental Psychology General (2019) Vol. 149, Iss. 3, pp. 407-418
Closed Access | Times Cited: 159

Understanding Fake News Consumption: A Review
João Pedro Baptista, Anabela Gradim
Social Sciences (2020) Vol. 9, Iss. 10, pp. 185-185
Open Access | Times Cited: 143

Page 1 - Next Page

Scroll to top