Open Access Helper

OpenAlex Citation Counts

OpenAlex Citations Logo

OpenAlex is a bibliographic catalogue of scientific papers, authors and institutions accessible in open access mode, named after the Library of Alexandria. It's citation coverage is excellent and I hope you will find utility in this listing of citing articles!

If you click the article title, you'll navigate to the article, as listed in CrossRef. If you click the Open Access links, you'll navigate to the "best Open Access location". Clicking the citation count will open this listing for that article. Lastly at the bottom of the page, you'll find basic pagination options.

Requested Article:

The ethics of scientific communication under uncertainty
Robert O. Keohane, Melissa Lane, Michael Oppenheimer
Politics Philosophy & Economics (2014) Vol. 13, Iss. 4, pp. 343-368
Open Access | Times Cited: 97

Showing 1-25 of 97 citing articles:

Epistemic trust and the ethics of science communication: against transparency, openness, sincerity and honesty
Stephen John
Social Epistemology (2017) Vol. 32, Iss. 2, pp. 75-87
Closed Access | Times Cited: 139
The Evolving Field of Risk Communication
Dominic H. P. Balog‐Way, Katherine A. McComas, John C. Besley
Risk Analysis (2020) Vol. 40, Iss. S1, pp. 2240-2262
Open Access | Times Cited: 134
Environmental data visualisation for non-scientific contexts: Literature review and design framework
Sam Grainger, Feng Mao, Wouter Buytaert
Environmental Modelling & Software (2016) Vol. 85, pp. 299-318
Open Access | Times Cited: 106
Science, Values, and Science Communication: Competencies for Pushing Beyond the Deficit Model
Sherry Seethaler, John H. Evans, Cathy Gere, et al.
Science Communication (2019) Vol. 41, Iss. 3, pp. 378-388
Open Access | Times Cited: 105
The Effects of Uncertainty Frames in Three Science Communication Topics
Abel Gustafson, Ronald E. Rice
Science Communication (2019) Vol. 41, Iss. 6, pp. 679-706
Open Access | Times Cited: 103
Communicating model uncertainty for natural hazards: A qualitative systematic thematic review
Emma E.H. Doyle, David Johnston, Richard T. Smith, et al.
International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction (2018) Vol. 33, pp. 449-476
Open Access | Times Cited: 92
Why we need to focus on developing ethical, responsible, and trustworthy artificial intelligence approaches for environmental science
Amy McGovern, Imme Ebert‐Uphoff, David John Gagne, et al.
Environmental Data Science (2022) Vol. 1
Open Access | Times Cited: 58
Citizen Knowledge
Lisa Herzog
Oxford University Press eBooks (2023)
Open Access | Times Cited: 29
Motivating COVID-19 Vaccination through Persuasive Communication: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials
Shilin Xia, Xiaoli Nan
Health Communication (2023) Vol. 39, Iss. 8, pp. 1455-1478
Closed Access | Times Cited: 22
Ensuring climate information guides long-term development
Lindsey Jones, Andrew J. Dougill, Richard Jones, et al.
Nature Climate Change (2015) Vol. 5, Iss. 9, pp. 812-814
Closed Access | Times Cited: 87
Public deliberation and the fact of expertise: making experts accountable
Cathrine Holst, Anders Molander
Social Epistemology (2017) Vol. 31, Iss. 3, pp. 235-250
Open Access | Times Cited: 77
A Taxonomy of Transparency in Science
Kevin C. Elliott
Canadian Journal of Philosophy (2020) Vol. 52, Iss. 3, pp. 342-355
Open Access | Times Cited: 55
A New Dark Age? Truth, Trust, and Environmental Science
Torbjørn Gundersen, Donya Alinejad, T. Y. Branch, et al.
Annual Review of Environment and Resources (2022) Vol. 47, Iss. 1, pp. 5-29
Open Access | Times Cited: 22
A Meta-Analysis Synthesizing the Effects of Three Uncertainty Types in Science Communication
Guo Zaifu, Ke Liu, Meng Chen
Science Communication (2025)
Closed Access
A temperature check on climate communication: where are we?
Natasha A. Strydhorst
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications (2025) Vol. 12, Iss. 1
Open Access
WHEN THE EXPERTS ARE UNCERTAIN: SCIENTIFIC KNOWLEDGE AND THE ETHICS OF DEMOCRATIC JUDGMENT
Melissa Lane
Episteme (2013) Vol. 11, Iss. 1, pp. 97-118
Closed Access | Times Cited: 47
Scientists as experts: A distinct role?
Torbjørn Gundersen
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A (2018) Vol. 69, pp. 52-59
Open Access | Times Cited: 44
Servitizing climate science—Institutional analysis of climate services discourse and its implications
Atte Harjanne
Global Environmental Change (2017) Vol. 46, pp. 1-16
Closed Access | Times Cited: 43
What do people know about climate change ― and how confident are they? On measurements and analyses of science related knowledge
Monika Taddicken, Anne Reif, Imke Hoppe
Journal of Science Communication (2018) Vol. 17, Iss. 03, pp. A01-A01
Open Access | Times Cited: 39
Scientific Testimony
Mikkel Gerken
Oxford University Press eBooks (2022)
Closed Access | Times Cited: 20
Using Democratic Values in Science: An Objection and (Partial) Response
S. Andrew Schroeder
Philosophy of Science (2017) Vol. 84, Iss. 5, pp. 1044-1054
Open Access | Times Cited: 34
A review of the literature on ethical issues related to scientific authorship
Mohammad Hosseini, Bert Gordijn
Accountability in Research (2020) Vol. 27, Iss. 5, pp. 284-324
Open Access | Times Cited: 29
Expertise, Policy-making and Democracy
Cathrine Holst, Anders Molander, Johan Christensen
(2022)
Open Access | Times Cited: 18
Evidence-based uncertainty analysis: What should we now do in Europe? A view point
Ragnar E. Löfstedt, Frédéric Bouder
Journal of Risk Research (2017) Vol. 24, Iss. 5, pp. 521-540
Open Access | Times Cited: 32
The Limits of Transparency: Expert Knowledge and Meaningful Accountability in Central Banking
Eugénia C. Heldt, Lisa Herzog
Government and Opposition (2021) Vol. 57, Iss. 2, pp. 217-232
Open Access | Times Cited: 21
Page 1 - Next Page

Scroll to top