Open Access Helper

OpenAlex Citation Counts

OpenAlex Citations Logo

OpenAlex is a bibliographic catalogue of scientific papers, authors and institutions accessible in open access mode, named after the Library of Alexandria. It's citation coverage is excellent and I hope you will find utility in this listing of citing articles!

If you click the article title, you'll navigate to the article, as listed in CrossRef. If you click the Open Access links, you'll navigate to the "best Open Access location". Clicking the citation count will open this listing for that article. Lastly at the bottom of the page, you'll find basic pagination options.

Requested Article:

Value Predispositions, Mass Media, and Attitudes Toward Nanotechnology: The Interplay of Public and Experts
Shirley S. Ho, Dietram A. Scheufele, Elizabeth A. Corley
Science Communication (2010) Vol. 33, Iss. 2, pp. 167-200
Closed Access | Times Cited: 94

Showing 1-25 of 94 citing articles:

Fact-checking as risk communication: the multi-layered risk of misinformation in times of COVID-19
Nicole M. Krause, Isabelle Freiling, Becca Beets, et al.
Journal of Risk Research (2020) Vol. 23, Iss. 7-8, pp. 1052-1059
Closed Access | Times Cited: 370
Extended theory of planned behavior in explaining the intention to COVID-19 vaccination uptake among mainland Chinese university students: an online survey study
Chia-Wei Fan, I‐Hua Chen, Nai‐Ying Ko, et al.
Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics (2021) Vol. 17, Iss. 10, pp. 3413-3420
Open Access | Times Cited: 148
Science communication with generative AI
Amanda A. Alvarez, Aylin Caliskan, Molly J. Crockett, et al.
Nature Human Behaviour (2024) Vol. 8, Iss. 4, pp. 625-627
Closed Access | Times Cited: 14
Consumer attitudes towards nanotechnologies applied to food production
Lynn J. Frewer, Nidhi Gupta, Saji George, et al.
Trends in Food Science & Technology (2014) Vol. 40, Iss. 2, pp. 211-225
Open Access | Times Cited: 99
Whose AI? How different publics think about AI and its social impacts
Luye Bao, Nicole M. Krause, Mikhaila N. Calice, et al.
Computers in Human Behavior (2022) Vol. 130, pp. 107182-107182
Closed Access | Times Cited: 62
Do environmental attitudes affect public acceptance of key enabling technologies? Assessing the influence of environmental awareness and trust on public perceptions about nanotechnology
Niccolò Maria Todaro, Natalia Marzia Gusmerotti, Tiberio Daddi, et al.
Journal of Cleaner Production (2023) Vol. 387, pp. 135964-135964
Open Access | Times Cited: 25
Making sense of policy choices: understanding the roles of value predispositions, mass media, and cognitive processing in public attitudes toward nanotechnology
Shirley S. Ho, Dietram A. Scheufele, Elizabeth A. Corley
Journal of Nanoparticle Research (2010) Vol. 12, Iss. 8, pp. 2703-2715
Open Access | Times Cited: 96
Seeking Information About Climate Change
Shirley S. Ho, Benjamin H. Detenber, Sonny Rosenthal, et al.
Science Communication (2014) Vol. 36, Iss. 3, pp. 270-295
Open Access | Times Cited: 85
Consumer acceptance and rejection of emerging agrifood technologies and their applications
Lynn J. Frewer
European Review of Agricultural Economics (2017) Vol. 44, Iss. 4, pp. 683-704
Open Access | Times Cited: 73
Ethics, Risk and Benefits Associated with Different Applications of Nanotechnology: a Comparison of Expert and Consumer Perceptions of Drivers of Societal Acceptance
Nidhi Gupta, A.R.H. Fischer, Lynn J. Frewer
NanoEthics (2015) Vol. 9, Iss. 2, pp. 93-108
Open Access | Times Cited: 71
Emerging Debates About Breakthrough Science: Understanding the Interplay of Values and Cognition in Shaping Attitudes on Human Brain Organoids
Isabel I. Villanueva, Dayeon Eom, Ashley Cate, et al.
Science Communication (2025)
Closed Access
Factors influencing public risk–benefit considerations of nanotechnology: Assessing the effects of mass media, interpersonal communication, and elaborative processing
Shirley S. Ho, Dietram A. Scheufele, Elizabeth A. Corley
Public Understanding of Science (2011) Vol. 22, Iss. 5, pp. 606-623
Closed Access | Times Cited: 70
Factors influencing societal response of nanotechnology: an expert stakeholder analysis
Nidhi Gupta, A.R.H. Fischer, I.A. van der Lans, et al.
Journal of Nanoparticle Research (2012) Vol. 14, Iss. 5
Open Access | Times Cited: 61
The State of Public Opinion Research on Attitudes and Understanding of Science and Technology
John C. Besley
Bulletin of Science Technology & Society (2013) Vol. 33, Iss. 1-2, pp. 12-20
Closed Access | Times Cited: 56
Perceptions of risk from nanotechnologies and trust in stakeholders: a cross sectional study of public, academic, government and business attitudes
Adam Capon, James Gillespie, Margaret Rolfe, et al.
BMC Public Health (2015) Vol. 15, Iss. 1
Open Access | Times Cited: 56
Inequalities in Scientific Understanding
Leona Yi-Fan Su, Michael A. Cacciatore, Dietram A. Scheufele, et al.
Science Communication (2014) Vol. 36, Iss. 3, pp. 352-378
Closed Access | Times Cited: 55
What drives support for self-driving car technology in the United States?
Graham Dixon, P. Sol Hart, Christopher E. Clarke, et al.
Journal of Risk Research (2018) Vol. 23, Iss. 3, pp. 275-287
Closed Access | Times Cited: 52
Expert stakeholders’ perception of nanotechnology: risk, benefit, knowledge, and regulation
Simon Larsson, Magnus Jansson, Åsa Boholm
Journal of Nanoparticle Research (2019) Vol. 21, Iss. 3
Open Access | Times Cited: 52
Deference and decision-making in science and society: How deference to scientific authority goes beyond confidence in science and scientists to become authoritarianism
Emily L. Howell, Christopher D. Wirz, Dietram A. Scheufele, et al.
Public Understanding of Science (2020) Vol. 29, Iss. 8, pp. 800-818
Closed Access | Times Cited: 39
Public understanding of science and the perception of nanotechnology: the roles of interest in science, methodological knowledge, epistemological beliefs, and beliefs about science
Andrea Retzbach, Joachim Marschall, Marion Rahnke, et al.
Journal of Nanoparticle Research (2011) Vol. 13, Iss. 12, pp. 6231-6244
Closed Access | Times Cited: 56
Disentangling the Influence of Value Predispositions and Risk/Benefit Perceptions on Support for Nanotechnology Among the American Public
Jiyoun Kim, Sara K. Yeo, Dominique Brossard, et al.
Risk Analysis (2013) Vol. 34, Iss. 5, pp. 965-980
Closed Access | Times Cited: 49
The National Science Foundation’s science and technology survey and support for science funding, 2006–2014
John C. Besley
Public Understanding of Science (2016) Vol. 27, Iss. 1, pp. 94-109
Closed Access | Times Cited: 44
Determinants of stakeholders’ attitudes towards a new technology: nanotechnology applications for food, water, energy and medicine
Heleen van Dijk, A.R.H. Fischer, H.J.P. Marvin, et al.
Journal of Risk Research (2015) Vol. 20, Iss. 2, pp. 277-298
Closed Access | Times Cited: 40
Let’s nab fake science news: Predicting scientists’ support for interventions using the influence of presumed media influence model
Shirley S. Ho, Tong Jee Goh, Yan Wah Leung
Journalism (2020) Vol. 23, Iss. 4, pp. 910-928
Open Access | Times Cited: 34
Public perception of nanotechnology: A contrast between developed and developing countries
Ankita Rathore, G. Mahesh
Technology in Society (2021) Vol. 67, pp. 101751-101751
Closed Access | Times Cited: 28
Page 1 - Next Page

Scroll to top