OpenAlex Citation Counts

OpenAlex Citations Logo

OpenAlex is a bibliographic catalogue of scientific papers, authors and institutions accessible in open access mode, named after the Library of Alexandria. It's citation coverage is excellent and I hope you will find utility in this listing of citing articles!

If you click the article title, you'll navigate to the article, as listed in CrossRef. If you click the Open Access links, you'll navigate to the "best Open Access location". Clicking the citation count will open this listing for that article. Lastly at the bottom of the page, you'll find basic pagination options.

Requested Article:

Natural Frequencies Do Foster Public Understanding of Medical Tests: Comment on Pighin, Gonzalez, Savadori, and Girotto (2016)
Michelle McDowell, Mirta Galešić, Gerd Gigerenzer
Medical Decision Making (2018) Vol. 38, Iss. 3, pp. 390-399
Open Access | Times Cited: 14

Showing 14 citing articles:

Students’ performance and typical errors in filling empty probabilistic visualizations with probabilities or frequencies
Michael Rößner, Karin Binder, Corbinian Geier, et al.
Educational Studies in Mathematics (2025)
Open Access

The impact of electronic health records on the ordering of medical tests
Ofir Ben‐Assuli, Doron Sagi, Sofia Amador Nelke, et al.
Israel Journal of Health Policy Research (2025) Vol. 14, Iss. 1
Open Access

A New Visualization for Probabilistic Situations Containing Two Binary Events: The Frequency Net
Karin Binder, Stefan Krauß, Patrick Wiesner
Frontiers in Psychology (2020) Vol. 11
Open Access | Times Cited: 27

Why Can Only 24% Solve Bayesian Reasoning Problems in Natural Frequencies: Frequency Phobia in Spite of Probability Blindness
Patrick Weber, Karin Binder, Stefan Krauß
Frontiers in Psychology (2018) Vol. 9
Open Access | Times Cited: 30

Tversky and Kahneman’s Cognitive Illusions: Who Can Solve Them, and Why?
Georg Bruckmaier, Stefan Krauß, Karin Binder, et al.
Frontiers in Psychology (2021) Vol. 12
Open Access | Times Cited: 16

An Eye-Tracking Study of Statistical Reasoning With Tree Diagrams and 2 × 2 Tables
Georg Bruckmaier, Karin Binder, Stefan Krauß, et al.
Frontiers in Psychology (2019) Vol. 10
Open Access | Times Cited: 18

Do children have Bayesian intuitions?
Gerd Gigerenzer, Jan Multmeier, Andrea Föhring, et al.
Journal of Experimental Psychology General (2020) Vol. 150, Iss. 6, pp. 1041-1070
Open Access | Times Cited: 14

When intuitive Bayesians need to be good readers: The problem-wording effect on Bayesian reasoning
Miroslav Sirota, Gorka Navarrete, Marie Juanchich
Cognition (2024) Vol. 245, pp. 105722-105722
Open Access

The likelihood difference heuristic and binary test selection given situation-specific utilities.
Jonathan D. Nelson, Christine Rosenauer, Vincenza Crupi, et al.
Decision (2022) Vol. 9, Iss. 3, pp. 285-319
Open Access | Times Cited: 2

Von Baumdiagrammen über Doppelbäume zu Häufigkeitsnetzen – kognitive Überlastung oder didaktische Unterstützung?
Karin Binder, Nicole Steib, Stefan Krauß
Journal für Mathematik-Didaktik (2022) Vol. 44, Iss. 2, pp. 471-503
Open Access | Times Cited: 2

The jigsaw puzzle of fraudulent health claims: Missing psychological pieces
Scott O. Lilienfeld, Candice Basterfield
Social Science & Medicine (2020) Vol. 259, pp. 112818-112818
Closed Access | Times Cited: 1

The IN-DEEP project “INtegrating and Deriving Evidence, Experiences, Preferences”: a web information model on magnetic resonance imaging for people with multiple sclerosis
Cinzia Colombo, Paolo Confalonieri, Marco Rovaris, et al.
Journal of Neurology (2020) Vol. 267, Iss. 8, pp. 2421-2431
Closed Access | Times Cited: 1

Page 1

Scroll to top