Open Access Helper

OpenAlex Citation Counts

OpenAlex Citations Logo

OpenAlex is a bibliographic catalogue of scientific papers, authors and institutions accessible in open access mode, named after the Library of Alexandria. It's citation coverage is excellent and I hope you will find utility in this listing of citing articles!

If you click the article title, you'll navigate to the article, as listed in CrossRef. If you click the Open Access links, you'll navigate to the "best Open Access location". Clicking the citation count will open this listing for that article. Lastly at the bottom of the page, you'll find basic pagination options.

Requested Article:

Risk and Protective Factors for Inpatient Aggression
Michiel de Vries Robbé, Viviënne de Vogel, Edwin C. Wever, et al.
Criminal Justice and Behavior (2016) Vol. 43, Iss. 10, pp. 1364-1385
Closed Access | Times Cited: 38

Showing 1-25 of 38 citing articles:

Gender-Sensitive Violence Risk Assessment: Predictive Validity of Six Tools in Female Forensic Psychiatric Patients
Viviënne de Vogel, Mieke Bruggeman, Marike Lancel
Criminal Justice and Behavior (2019) Vol. 46, Iss. 4, pp. 528-549
Open Access | Times Cited: 45
The Structured Assessment of Protective Factors for violence risk (SAPROF): A meta-analysis of its predictive and incremental validity.
Matthias Burghart, Corine de Ruiter, Sophia Elianne Hynes, et al.
Psychological Assessment (2022) Vol. 35, Iss. 1, pp. 56-67
Open Access | Times Cited: 17
Strengths-Based Assessments for Use with Forensic Populations: A Critical Review
Kayla A. Wanamaker, Natalie J. Jones, Shelley L. Brown
International Journal of Forensic Mental Health (2018) Vol. 17, Iss. 2, pp. 202-221
Closed Access | Times Cited: 31
Understanding protective factors for violent reoffending in adults
Gabrielle Klepfisz, Michael Daffern, Andrew Day
Aggression and Violent Behavior (2016) Vol. 32, pp. 80-87
Closed Access | Times Cited: 28
Strength-based assessment for future violence risk: a retrospective validation study of the Structured Assessment of PROtective Factors for violence risk (SAPROF) Japanese version in forensic psychiatric inpatients
Hiroko Kashiwagi, Akiko Kikuchi, Mayuko Koyama, et al.
Annals of General Psychiatry (2018) Vol. 17, Iss. 1
Open Access | Times Cited: 24
Physical Violence During Mandatory Psychiatric Treatment: Prevalence and Patient Characteristics
Nienke Verstegen, Viviënne de Vogel, Anneloes Huitema, et al.
Criminal Justice and Behavior (2020) Vol. 47, Iss. 7, pp. 771-789
Closed Access | Times Cited: 23
Exploring Gender Differences in the Utility of Strength-Based Risk Assessment Measures
Simone Viljoen, Tonia L. Nicholls, Ronald Roesch, et al.
International Journal of Forensic Mental Health (2016) Vol. 15, Iss. 2, pp. 149-163
Closed Access | Times Cited: 21
Evaluating the utility of ‘strength’ items when assessing the risk of young offenders
Stephane M. Shepherd, Susanne Strand, Jodi L. Viljoen, et al.
Journal of Forensic Psychiatry and Psychology (2018) Vol. 29, Iss. 4, pp. 597-616
Closed Access | Times Cited: 21
Inpatient violence in a Dutch forensic psychiatric hospital
Nienke Verstegen, Viviënne de Vogel, Michiel de Vries Robbé, et al.
Journal of Forensic Practice (2017) Vol. 19, Iss. 2, pp. 102-114
Closed Access | Times Cited: 20
Performance of Protective Factors Assessment in Risk Prediction for Adults: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Laura E. O’Shea, Geoffrey L. Dickens
Clinical Psychology Science and Practice (2016) Vol. 23, Iss. 2, pp. 126-138
Open Access | Times Cited: 16
The Utility of SAPROF-YV Ratings for Predicting Recidivism in Male Youth Under Community Supervision in Singapore
Chi Meng Chu, Xuexin Xu, Dongdong Li, et al.
Criminal Justice and Behavior (2020) Vol. 47, Iss. 11, pp. 1409-1427
Closed Access | Times Cited: 14
Dynamic Relationship Between Protective Factors and Violent Outcomes Assessed Using the Structured Assessment of Protective Factors (SAPROF) in Secure Forensic Services
Alina Haines‐Delmont, Johan Hokan Bjørngaard, Andrew Brown, et al.
Journal of Forensic Psychology Research and Practice (2024), pp. 1-21
Open Access | Times Cited: 1
Evaluating and Managing Risk for Violence Using Structured Professional Judgment
Kevin S. Douglas
(2019), pp. 427-445
Closed Access | Times Cited: 9
Validating the SAPROF with Forensic Mental Health Patients
Sandra Oziel, Lisa A. Marshall, David M. Day
Journal of Forensic Psychiatry and Psychology (2020) Vol. 31, Iss. 5, pp. 667-698
Closed Access | Times Cited: 8
Predictive Validity of the HCR-20V3 With Incarcerated Males in Mexico City
Alicia Nijdam‐Jones, Éric García-López, Libertad Merchán-Rojas, et al.
Criminal Justice and Behavior (2021) Vol. 48, Iss. 10, pp. 1450-1467
Closed Access | Times Cited: 8
Shifting Trends in Admission Patterns of an Acute Inpatient Psychiatric Unit in the State of New York
Bhumika Shah, Luba Leontieva, James L Megna
Cureus (2020)
Open Access | Times Cited: 7
Promotive, Mixed, and Risk Effects of Individual Items Comprising the SAPROF Assessment Tool With Justice-Involved Youth
Calvin M. Langton, Mackenzie Betteridge, James R. Worling
Assessment (2023) Vol. 31, Iss. 2, pp. 418-430
Open Access | Times Cited: 2
The predictive validity of risk assessment tools used in Australia for female offenders: A systematic review
Menna Gower, Caroline Spiranovic, Frank Morgan, et al.
Aggression and Violent Behavior (2020) Vol. 53, pp. 101428-101428
Closed Access | Times Cited: 5
Facteurs de protection et facteurs de désistance chez les auteurs d’infraction à caractère sexuel : articulation et clarification
Caroline Benouamer, Émilie Telle, Luca Tiberi, et al.
Annales Médico-psychologiques revue psychiatrique (2024) Vol. 182, Iss. 2, pp. 201-210
Closed Access
The Risk Screener Violence (RS-V): retrospective prediction of violent and aggressive incidents within the prison setting
Marjam V. Smeekens, Michiel de Vries Robbé, Arne Popma, et al.
Frontiers in Psychology (2024) Vol. 15
Open Access
Examination of the Structured Assessment of Protective Factors for Violence Risk - Youth Version (SAPROF-YV) in Canadian Adolescents
Aisha K. Christiansen, Jodi L. Viljoen, Erin K. Fuller
International Journal of Risk and Recovery (2021) Vol. 4, Iss. 2, pp. 4-17
Open Access | Times Cited: 4
Facteurs de protection et facteurs de désistance chez les Auteurs d’Infraction à Caractère Sexuel : articulation et clarification
Caroline Benouamer, Émilie Telle, Luca Tiberi, et al.
Annales Médico-psychologiques revue psychiatrique (2024)
Closed Access
Differentiating Between Sexual Offending and Violent Non-sexual Offending in Men With Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorders Using Machine Learning
Steffen Lau, Elmar Habermeyer, Andreas Hill, et al.
Sexual Abuse (2023) Vol. 36, Iss. 7, pp. 821-847
Closed Access | Times Cited: 1
Inpatient aggression in forensic psychiatric patients with autism spectrum disorder: the role of risk and protective factors
Rianne Bosch, Farid Chakhssi, Ko Hummelen
Journal of Intellectual Disabilities and Offending Behaviour (2020) Vol. 11, Iss. 2, pp. 93-100
Closed Access | Times Cited: 3
Gender responsivity in the assessment and treatment of offenders
Menna Gower, Frank Morgan, Julie Saunders
Psychiatry Psychology and Law (2023) Vol. 31, Iss. 4, pp. 587-611
Open Access | Times Cited: 1
Page 1 - Next Page

Scroll to top