Open Access Helper

OpenAlex Citation Counts

OpenAlex Citations Logo

OpenAlex is a bibliographic catalogue of scientific papers, authors and institutions accessible in open access mode, named after the Library of Alexandria. It's citation coverage is excellent and I hope you will find utility in this listing of citing articles!

If you click the article title, you'll navigate to the article, as listed in CrossRef. If you click the Open Access links, you'll navigate to the "best Open Access location". Clicking the citation count will open this listing for that article. Lastly at the bottom of the page, you'll find basic pagination options.

Requested Article:

Characteristics, quality and volume of the first 5 months of the COVID-19 evidence synthesis infodemic: a meta-research study
Rebecca Abbott, Alison Bethel, Morwenna Rogers, et al.
BMJ evidence-based medicine (2021) Vol. 27, Iss. 3, pp. 169-177
Open Access | Times Cited: 45

Showing 1-25 of 45 citing articles:

Infodemics and health misinformation: a systematic review of reviews
Israel Júnior Borges do Nascimento, Ana Beatriz Pizarro, Jussara M. Almeida, et al.
Bulletin of the World Health Organization (2022) Vol. 100, Iss. 9, pp. 544-561
Open Access | Times Cited: 253
The rapid, massive growth of COVID-19 authors in the scientific literature
John P. A. Ioannidis, Maia Salholz-Hillel, Kevin W. Boyack, et al.
Royal Society Open Science (2021) Vol. 8, Iss. 9
Open Access | Times Cited: 79
Massive covidization of research citations and the citation elite
John P. A. Ioannidis, Eran Bendavid, Maia Salholz-Hillel, et al.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (2022) Vol. 119, Iss. 28
Open Access | Times Cited: 58
Validity of data extraction in evidence synthesis practice of adverse events: reproducibility study
Chang Xu, Tianqi Yu, Luis Furuya‐Kanamori, et al.
BMJ (2022), pp. e069155-e069155
Open Access | Times Cited: 40
Changing patterns in reporting and sharing of review data in systematic reviews with meta-analysis of the effects of interventions: cross sectional meta-research study
Phi‐Yen Nguyen, Raju Kanukula, Joanne E. McKenzie, et al.
BMJ (2022), pp. e072428-e072428
Open Access | Times Cited: 38
Systematic review search strategies are poorly reported and not reproducible: a cross-sectional metaresearch study
Melissa L. Rethlefsen, Tara Brigham, Carrie Price, et al.
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology (2023) Vol. 166, pp. 111229-111229
Open Access | Times Cited: 15
The COVID-19 Infodemic: Mechanism, Impact, and Counter-Measures—A Review of Reviews
Markus Ries
Sustainability (2022) Vol. 14, Iss. 5, pp. 2605-2605
Open Access | Times Cited: 25
Digital health literacy and subjective wellbeing in the context of COVID-19: A cross-sectional study among university students in Ecuador
María F. Rivadeneira, C. Salvador Coloma, Lorena Araujo, et al.
Frontiers in Public Health (2023) Vol. 10
Open Access | Times Cited: 13
Societal and scientific impact of policy research: A large-scale empirical study of some explanatory factors using Altmetric and Overton
Pablo Dorta‐González, Alejandro Rodrı́guez, María Isabel Dorta-González
Journal of Informetrics (2024) Vol. 18, Iss. 3, pp. 101530-101530
Open Access | Times Cited: 4
Conflict of Interests in the Scientific Production on Vitamin D and COVID-19: A Scoping Review
Carolina Saggioro Meissonier Passini, Maria Birman Cavalcanti, Simone Augusta Ribas, et al.
Frontiers in Public Health (2022) Vol. 10
Open Access | Times Cited: 19
Most published systematic reviews of remdesivir for COVID-19 were redundant and lacked currency
Steve McDonald, Simon Turner, Matthew J. Page, et al.
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology (2022) Vol. 146, pp. 22-31
Open Access | Times Cited: 18
The age of abundant scholarly information and its synthesis– A time when ‘just google it’ is no longer enough
Michael Gusenbauer
Research Synthesis Methods (2021) Vol. 12, Iss. 6, pp. 684-691
Open Access | Times Cited: 21
Is a one-size-fits-all ‘12-month rule’ appropriate when it comes to the last search date in systematic reviews?
Gillian Stokes, Katy Sutcliffe, James Thomas
BMJ evidence-based medicine (2022) Vol. 28, Iss. 6, pp. 359-363
Open Access | Times Cited: 13
Searching for evidence in public health emergencies: a white paper of best practices
Stacy Brody, Sara Loree, Margaret Sampson, et al.
Journal of the Medical Library Association JMLA (2023) Vol. 111, Iss. 1/2, pp. 566-578
Open Access | Times Cited: 7
Systematic literature reviews over the years
B. Smela, Mondher Toumi, K. Świerk, et al.
Journal of Market Access & Health Policy (2023) Vol. 11, Iss. 1
Open Access | Times Cited: 7
Evidence in decision-making in the context of COVID-19 in Latin America
Victoria Stanford, Lionel Gresh, João Toledo, et al.
The Lancet Regional Health - Americas (2022) Vol. 14, pp. 100322-100322
Open Access | Times Cited: 11
A suggested data structure for transparent and repeatable reporting of bibliographic searching
Neal Haddaway, Melissa L. Rethlefsen, Melinda Davies, et al.
Campbell Systematic Reviews (2022) Vol. 18, Iss. 4
Open Access | Times Cited: 11
Transparency in Infectious Disease Research: Meta-research Survey of Specialty Journals
Emmanuel A. Zavalis, Despina G. Contopoulos‐Ioannidis, John P. A. Ioannidis
The Journal of Infectious Diseases (2023) Vol. 228, Iss. 3, pp. 227-234
Open Access | Times Cited: 6
Are COVID-19 systematic reviews up to date and can we tell? A cross-sectional study
Steve McDonald, Simon Turner, Phi‐Yen Nguyen, et al.
Systematic Reviews (2023) Vol. 12, Iss. 1
Open Access | Times Cited: 6
How can policy document mentions to scholarly papers be interpreted? An analysis of the underlying mentioning process
Houqiang Yu, Biegzat Murat, Jiatong Li, et al.
Scientometrics (2023) Vol. 128, Iss. 11, pp. 6247-6266
Open Access | Times Cited: 6
The rapid, massive growth of COVID-19 authors in the scientific literature
John P. A. Ioannidis, Maia Salholz-Hillel, Kevin W. Boyack, et al.
bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (2020)
Open Access | Times Cited: 17
Three out of four published systematic reviews on COVID-19 treatments were not registered and one-third of those registered were published: a meta-research study
Waldemar Siemens, Julia Nothacker, Julia Stadelmaier, et al.
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology (2022) Vol. 152, pp. 36-46
Open Access | Times Cited: 10
The quality of COVID-19 systematic reviews during the coronavirus 2019 pandemic: an exploratory comparison
Kevin McDermott, Mark Perry, W.E. van der Linden, et al.
Systematic Reviews (2024) Vol. 13, Iss. 1
Open Access | Times Cited: 1
Exploring decision-makers’ challenges and strategies when selecting multiple systematic reviews: insights for AI decision support tools in healthcare
Carole Lunny, Sera Whitelaw, Emma K. Reid, et al.
BMJ Open (2024) Vol. 14, Iss. 7, pp. e084124-e084124
Open Access | Times Cited: 1
Changing patterns in reporting and sharing of review data in systematic reviews with meta-analysis of the effects of interventions: a meta-research study
Phi‐Yen Nguyen, Raju Kanukula, Joanne E. McKenzie, et al.
medRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (2022)
Open Access | Times Cited: 8
Page 1 - Next Page

Scroll to top