OpenAlex Citation Counts

OpenAlex Citations Logo

OpenAlex is a bibliographic catalogue of scientific papers, authors and institutions accessible in open access mode, named after the Library of Alexandria. It's citation coverage is excellent and I hope you will find utility in this listing of citing articles!

If you click the article title, you'll navigate to the article, as listed in CrossRef. If you click the Open Access links, you'll navigate to the "best Open Access location". Clicking the citation count will open this listing for that article. Lastly at the bottom of the page, you'll find basic pagination options.

Requested Article:

Covid-19: How the UK is using lateral flow tests in the pandemic
Ingrid Torjesen
BMJ (2021), pp. n287-n287
Closed Access | Times Cited: 53

Showing 1-25 of 53 citing articles:

Performance of the Innova SARS-CoV-2 antigen rapid lateral flow test in the Liverpool asymptomatic testing pilot: population based cohort study
Marta García‐Fiñana, David M. Hughes, Christopher P. Cheyne, et al.
BMJ (2021), pp. n1637-n1637
Open Access | Times Cited: 79

Ultrarapid detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA using a reverse transcription–free exponential amplification reaction, RTF-EXPAR
Jake G. Carter, Lorea Orueta Iturbe, Jean‐Louis H. A. Duprey, et al.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (2021) Vol. 118, Iss. 35
Open Access | Times Cited: 65

Molecularly Imprinted Polymer Nanoparticles Enable Rapid, Reliable, and Robust Point-of-Care Thermal Detection of SARS-CoV-2
Jake McClements, Laure Bar, Pankaj Singla, et al.
ACS Sensors (2022) Vol. 7, Iss. 4, pp. 1122-1131
Open Access | Times Cited: 65

Contact tracing is an imperfect tool for controlling COVID-19 transmission and relies on population adherence
Emma L. Davis, Tim Lucas, Anna Borlase, et al.
Nature Communications (2021) Vol. 12, Iss. 1
Open Access | Times Cited: 55

Perceptions on undertaking regular asymptomatic self-testing for COVID-19 using lateral flow tests: a qualitative study of university students and staff
Marta Wanat, Mary Logan, Jennifer Hirst, et al.
BMJ Open (2021) Vol. 11, Iss. 9, pp. e053850-e053850
Open Access | Times Cited: 40

Rapid antigen testing as a reactive response to surges in nosocomial SARS-CoV-2 outbreak risk
David R. Smith, Audrey Duval, Jean Ralph Zahar, et al.
Nature Communications (2022) Vol. 13, Iss. 1
Open Access | Times Cited: 24

Comparison of Nasal Swabs, Nasopharyngeal Swabs, and Saliva Samples for the Detection of SARS-CoV-2 and other Respiratory Virus Infections
Eun Ju Jung, Su Kyung Lee, Seon Hee Shin, et al.
Annals of Laboratory Medicine (2023) Vol. 43, Iss. 5, pp. 434-442
Open Access | Times Cited: 13

Engagement with daily testing instead of self-isolating in contacts of confirmed cases of SARS-CoV-2
Alex F. Martin, Sarah Denford, Nicola Love, et al.
BMC Public Health (2021) Vol. 21, Iss. 1
Open Access | Times Cited: 28

A precise review on NAATs‐based diagnostic assays for COVID‐19: A motion in fast POC molecular tests
Bahareh Maleki, Zohreh Hojati
European Journal of Clinical Investigation (2022) Vol. 52, Iss. 11
Open Access | Times Cited: 16

Engagement With Daily Testing Instead of Self-Isolating in Contacts of Confirmed Cases of SARS-CoV-2: A Qualitative Analysis
Sarah Denford, Alex F. Martin, Nicola Love, et al.
Frontiers in Public Health (2021) Vol. 9
Open Access | Times Cited: 21

Facile and rapid detection of SARS-CoV-2 antibody based on a noncompetitive fluorescence polarization immunoassay in human serum samples
Keine Nishiyama, Kazuki Takahashi, Mao Fukuyama, et al.
Biosensors and Bioelectronics (2021) Vol. 190, pp. 113414-113414
Open Access | Times Cited: 20

A prospective diagnostic evaluation of accuracy of self-taken and healthcare worker-taken swabs for rapid COVID-19 testing
Helen R. Savage, Lorna Finch, Richard Body, et al.
PLoS ONE (2022) Vol. 17, Iss. 6, pp. e0270715-e0270715
Open Access | Times Cited: 15

Validation of a rapid, saliva-based, and ultra-sensitive SARS-CoV-2 screening system for pandemic-scale infection surveillance
Robert E. Dewhurst, Tatjana Heinrich, Paul M. Watt, et al.
Scientific Reports (2022) Vol. 12, Iss. 1
Open Access | Times Cited: 14

An imperfect tool: contact tracing could provide valuable reductions in COVID-19 transmission if good adherence can be achieved and maintained
Emma L. Davis, Tim Lucas, Anna Borlase, et al.
medRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (2020)
Open Access | Times Cited: 21

Implementing lateral flow devices in long-term care facilities: experiences from the Liverpool COVID-19 community testing pilot in care homes— a qualitative study
Patrick Kierkegaard, Massimo Micocci, Anna McLister, et al.
BMC Health Services Research (2021) Vol. 21, Iss. 1
Open Access | Times Cited: 18

Rapid antigen testing in COVID-19 management for school-aged children: an observational study in Cheshire and Merseyside, UK
David M. Hughes, Sheila M. Bird, Christopher P. Cheyne, et al.
Journal of Public Health (2022) Vol. 45, Iss. 1, pp. e38-e47
Open Access | Times Cited: 13

Saliva for COVID-19 Testing: Simple but Useless or an Undervalued Resource?
Sara Pijuan‐Galito, Francesco Saverio Tarantini, Hannah Tomlin, et al.
Frontiers in Virology (2021) Vol. 1
Open Access | Times Cited: 16

Recovery Study of Gold Nanoparticle Markers from Lateral Flow Immunoassays
Tilen Švarc, Peter Majerič, Darja Feizpour, et al.
Materials (2023) Vol. 16, Iss. 17, pp. 5770-5770
Open Access | Times Cited: 6

What do we know about lateral flow tests and mass testing in schools?
Ingrid Torjesen
BMJ (2021), pp. n706-n706
Open Access | Times Cited: 15

Use of emerging testing technologies and approaches for SARS-CoV-2: review of literature and global experience in an Australian context
Maryza Graham, Susan A. Ballard, Shivani Pasricha, et al.
Pathology (2021) Vol. 53, Iss. 6, pp. 689-699
Open Access | Times Cited: 15

An Overview of SARS-CoV-2 Molecular Diagnostics in Europe
Emma Davies, Hamzah Z. Farooq, Benjamin Brown, et al.
Clinics in Laboratory Medicine (2022) Vol. 42, Iss. 2, pp. 161-191
Open Access | Times Cited: 9

Low uptake of COVID-19 lateral flow testing among university students: a mixed methods evaluation
Clare French, Sarah Denford, Ellen Brooks‐Pollock, et al.
Public Health (2022) Vol. 204, pp. 54-62
Open Access | Times Cited: 9

Page 1 - Next Page

Scroll to top