Open Access Helper

OpenAlex Citation Counts

OpenAlex Citations Logo

OpenAlex is a bibliographic catalogue of scientific papers, authors and institutions accessible in open access mode, named after the Library of Alexandria. It's citation coverage is excellent and I hope you will find utility in this listing of citing articles!

If you click the article title, you'll navigate to the article, as listed in CrossRef. If you click the Open Access links, you'll navigate to the "best Open Access location". Clicking the citation count will open this listing for that article. Lastly at the bottom of the page, you'll find basic pagination options.

Requested Article:

Reversing motor adaptation deficits in the ageing brain using non‐invasive stimulation
Muriel Panouillères, Raed A. Joundi, John‐Stuart Brittain, et al.
The Journal of Physiology (2015) Vol. 593, Iss. 16, pp. 3645-3655
Open Access | Times Cited: 60

Showing 1-25 of 60 citing articles:

Low intensity transcranial electric stimulation: Safety, ethical, legal regulatory and application guidelines
Andrea Antal, Ivan Alekseichuk, Marom Bikson, et al.
Clinical Neurophysiology (2017) Vol. 128, Iss. 9, pp. 1774-1809
Open Access | Times Cited: 1029
Does transcranial direct current stimulation enhance cognitive and motor functions in the ageing brain? A systematic review and meta- analysis
Jeffery J. Summers, Nyeonju Kang, James H. Cauraugh
Ageing Research Reviews (2015) Vol. 25, pp. 42-54
Open Access | Times Cited: 166
Targeting the Cerebellum by Noninvasive Neurostimulation: a Review
Kim van Dun, Florian Bodranghien, Mario Manto, et al.
The Cerebellum (2016) Vol. 16, Iss. 3, pp. 695-741
Closed Access | Times Cited: 115
tDCS of the Cerebellum: Where Do We Stand in 2016? Technical Issues and Critical Review of the Literature
Kim van Dun, Florian Bodranghien, Peter Mariën, et al.
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience (2016) Vol. 10
Open Access | Times Cited: 104
Can transcranial direct current stimulation counteract age-associated functional impairment?
Garon Perceval, Agnes Flöel, Marcus Meinzer
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews (2016) Vol. 65, pp. 157-172
Closed Access | Times Cited: 87
Cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation improves adaptive postural control
Peter C. Poortvliet, Billie Hsieh, Andrew G. Cresswell, et al.
Clinical Neurophysiology (2017) Vol. 129, Iss. 1, pp. 33-41
Open Access | Times Cited: 58
Targeted tDCS selectively improves motor adaptation with the proximal and distal upper limb
Matthew Weightman, John‐Stuart Brittain, T. David Punt, et al.
Brain stimulation (2020) Vol. 13, Iss. 3, pp. 707-716
Open Access | Times Cited: 42
Neurophysiology of cerebellar ataxias and gait disorders
Mario Manto, Mariano Serrao, Stefano Filippo Castiglia, et al.
Clinical Neurophysiology Practice (2023) Vol. 8, pp. 143-160
Open Access | Times Cited: 13
Cerebellar patients do not benefit from cerebellar or M1 transcranial direct current stimulation during force-field reaching adaptation
Thomas Hulst, Liane John, Michael Küper, et al.
Journal of Neurophysiology (2017) Vol. 118, Iss. 2, pp. 732-748
Open Access | Times Cited: 46
Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Neural Networks in Young and Older Adults
Andrew K. Martin, Marcus Meinzer, Robert Lindenberg, et al.
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience (2017) Vol. 29, Iss. 11, pp. 1817-1828
Open Access | Times Cited: 45
Beneficial effects of cerebellar tDCS on motor learning are associated with altered putamen-cerebellar connectivity: A simultaneous tDCS-fMRI study
Matthias Liebrand, Anke Ninija Karabanov, Daria Antonenko, et al.
NeuroImage (2020) Vol. 223, pp. 117363-117363
Open Access | Times Cited: 37
Multisession Anodal tDCS Protocol Improves Motor System Function in an Aging Population
Gaëlle Dumel, Marie‐Ève Bourassa, Martine Desjardins, et al.
Neural Plasticity (2016) Vol. 2016, pp. 1-8
Open Access | Times Cited: 33
The Impact of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Upper-Limb Motor Performance in Healthy Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Ronak Patel, James Ashcroft, Ashish Patel, et al.
Frontiers in Neuroscience (2019) Vol. 13
Open Access | Times Cited: 31
Cortico-cerebellar Networks Drive Sensorimotor Learning in Speech
Daniel R. Lametti, Harriet J. Smith, Phoebe F. Freidin, et al.
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience (2017) Vol. 30, Iss. 4, pp. 540-551
Open Access | Times Cited: 31
The Effect of Cerebellar Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Motor Learning: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials
Nitika Kumari, Denise Taylor, Nada Signal
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience (2019) Vol. 13
Open Access | Times Cited: 27
Multisession anodal transcranial direct current stimulation induces motor cortex plasticity enhancement and motor learning generalization in an aging population
Gaëlle Dumel, Marie‐Ève Bourassa, Camille Charlebois‐Plante, et al.
Clinical Neurophysiology (2017) Vol. 129, Iss. 2, pp. 494-502
Closed Access | Times Cited: 25
Lateralized effects of post-learning transcranial direct current stimulation on motor memory consolidation in older adults: An fMRI investigation
Bradley R. King, Jost‐Julian Rumpf, Kirstin-Friederike Heise, et al.
NeuroImage (2020) Vol. 223, pp. 117323-117323
Open Access | Times Cited: 21
Cerebellar anodal tDCS increases implicit learning when strategic re-aiming is suppressed in sensorimotor adaptation
Li‐Ann Leow, Welber Marinovic, Stephan Riek, et al.
PLoS ONE (2017) Vol. 12, Iss. 7, pp. e0179977-e0179977
Open Access | Times Cited: 24
The perils of learning to move while speaking: One-sided interference between speech and visuomotor adaptation
Daniel R. Lametti, Marcus Y. M. Quek, Calum B. Prescott, et al.
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review (2020) Vol. 27, Iss. 3, pp. 544-552
Open Access | Times Cited: 19
Age-related changes in motor cortex plasticity assessed with non-invasive brain stimulation: an update and new perspectives
John G. Semmler, Brodie J. Hand, Ryoki Sasaki, et al.
Experimental Brain Research (2021) Vol. 239, Iss. 9, pp. 2661-2678
Closed Access | Times Cited: 16
Remote Effects of Non-Invasive Cerebellar Stimulation on Error Processing in Motor Re-Learning
Marco Taubert, Thorsten Stein, Tommy Kreutzberg, et al.
Brain stimulation (2016) Vol. 9, Iss. 5, pp. 692-699
Closed Access | Times Cited: 18
Changes in Corticospinal Excitability and Motor Control During Cerebellar Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Healthy Individuals
Keita Takano, Natsuki Katagiri, Takatsugu Sato, et al.
The Cerebellum (2022) Vol. 22, Iss. 5, pp. 905-914
Closed Access | Times Cited: 10
Motor Learning Improvement Remains 3 Months After a Multisession Anodal tDCS Intervention in an Aging Population
Gaëlle Dumel, Marie‐Ève Bourassa, Camille Charlebois‐Plante, et al.
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience (2018) Vol. 10
Open Access | Times Cited: 17
No Impact of Cerebellar Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation at Three Different Timings on Motor Learning in a Sequential Finger-Tapping Task
Carine Nguemeni, Annika Stiehl, Shawn Hiew, et al.
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience (2021) Vol. 15
Open Access | Times Cited: 13
Cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation for learning a novel split-belt treadmill task: a randomised controlled trial
Nitika Kumari, Denise Taylor, Usman Rashid, et al.
Scientific Reports (2020) Vol. 10, Iss. 1
Open Access | Times Cited: 13
Page 1 - Next Page

Scroll to top