Open Access Helper

OpenAlex Citation Counts

OpenAlex Citations Logo

OpenAlex is a bibliographic catalogue of scientific papers, authors and institutions accessible in open access mode, named after the Library of Alexandria. It's citation coverage is excellent and I hope you will find utility in this listing of citing articles!

If you click the article title, you'll navigate to the article, as listed in CrossRef. If you click the Open Access links, you'll navigate to the "best Open Access location". Clicking the citation count will open this listing for that article. Lastly at the bottom of the page, you'll find basic pagination options.

Requested Article:

Over‐marking and Adjacent Marking are Influenced by Sibship in Male Prairie Voles, Microtus ochrogaster
Kristen L. Kohli, Michael H. Ferkin
Ethology (1999) Vol. 105, Iss. 1, pp. 1-11
Closed Access | Times Cited: 25

Showing 25 citing articles:

KIN RECOGNITION IN GROUND SQUIRRELS AND OTHER RODENTS
Jill M. Mateo
Journal of Mammalogy (2003) Vol. 84, Iss. 4, pp. 1163-1181
Open Access | Times Cited: 158
Meadow voles, Microtus pennsylvanicus, can distinguish more over-marks from fewer over-marks
Michael H. Ferkin, Andrew A. Pierce, Robert O. Sealand, et al.
Animal Cognition (2004) Vol. 8, Iss. 3, pp. 182-189
Closed Access | Times Cited: 79
Perspectives on over-marking: is it good to be on top?
Michael H. Ferkin, Andrew A. Pierce
Journal of Ethology (2006) Vol. 25, Iss. 2, pp. 107-116
Closed Access | Times Cited: 59
Meadow Voles (Microtus pennsylvanicus, Arvicolidae) Over‐mark and Adjacent‐mark the Scent Marks of Same‐sex Conspecifics
Michael H. Ferkin
Ethology (1999) Vol. 105, Iss. 10, pp. 825-837
Closed Access | Times Cited: 45
Meadow Voles (Microtus pennsylvanicus) and Prairie Voles (M. ochrogaster) Differ in Their Responses to Over‐Marks from Opposite‐ and Same‐Sex Conspecifics
Raymond L. Woodward, Kim Bartos, Michael H. Ferkin
Ethology (2000) Vol. 106, Iss. 11, pp. 979-992
Closed Access | Times Cited: 43
Meadow voles and prairie voles differ in the percentage of conspecific marks they over-mark
MichaelH. Ferkin, HongZ. Li, StuartT. Leonard
acta ethologica (2004) Vol. 7, Iss. 1
Closed Access | Times Cited: 34
Scent marks of rodents can provide information to conspecifics
Michael H. Ferkin
Animal Cognition (2019) Vol. 22, Iss. 3, pp. 445-452
Closed Access | Times Cited: 18
Scent Marking in Voles: A Reassessment of Over Marking, Counter Marking, and Self‐Advertisement
Shawn A. Thomas, Jerry O. Wolff
Ethology (2002) Vol. 108, Iss. 1, pp. 51-62
Closed Access | Times Cited: 32
Scent marking and mate choice in the prairie vole, Microtus ochrogaster
Shawn A. Thomas
Animal Behaviour (2002) Vol. 63, Iss. 6, pp. 1121-1127
Closed Access | Times Cited: 32
Top marks from top dogs: tandem marking and pair bond advertisement in African wild dogs
Neil R. Jordan, Peter Apps, Krystyna A. Golabek, et al.
Animal Behaviour (2014) Vol. 88, pp. 211-217
Closed Access | Times Cited: 18
Scent matching modulates space use and agonistic behaviour between male snow voles, Chionomys nivalis
Juán José Luque-Larena, Pílar López, Joaquím Gosálbez
Animal Behaviour (2001) Vol. 62, Iss. 6, pp. 1089-1095
Closed Access | Times Cited: 28
Effects of previous interactions and sex on over-marking in meadow voles
Michael H. Ferkin
Behaviour (2007) Vol. 144, Iss. 10, pp. 1297-1313
Closed Access | Times Cited: 18
Do olfactory behaviour and marking responses of Konik polski stallions to faeces from conspecifics of either sex differ?
Tadeusz Jezierski, Zbigniew Jaworski, Magdalena Sobczyńska, et al.
Behavioural Processes (2017) Vol. 155, pp. 38-42
Closed Access | Times Cited: 13
Scent Over-Marking and Adjacent-Marking as Competitive Tactics Used During Chemical Communication in Voles
Michael H. Ferkin
Springer eBooks (1999), pp. 239-246
Closed Access | Times Cited: 27
Excreta-mediated olfactory communication in Konik stallions: A preliminary study
Tadeusz Jezierski, Zbigniew Jaworski, Magdalena Sobczyńska, et al.
Journal of Veterinary Behavior (2015) Vol. 10, Iss. 4, pp. 353-364
Closed Access | Times Cited: 11
Chemosensory Identification of Lizard-Eating Snakes in the Desert Iguana, Dipsosaurus dorsalis (Squamata: Iguanidae)
Matthew T. Bealor, C. O'Neil Krekorian
Journal of Herpetology (2002) Vol. 36, Iss. 1, pp. 9-15
Closed Access | Times Cited: 20
The function of scent marking in beaver (Castor fiber) territorial defence
Frank Rosell
(2002)
Closed Access | Times Cited: 16
Species differences in urine scent-marking and counter-marking in Peromyscus
Elizabeth A. Becker, Frank R. Castelli, Christine N. Yohn, et al.
Behavioural Processes (2017) Vol. 146, pp. 1-9
Closed Access | Times Cited: 7
Female prairie voles do not choose males based on their frequency of scent marking
Stephen G. Mech, Aimee S. Dunlap, Jerry O. Wolff
Behavioural Processes (2003) Vol. 61, Iss. 3, pp. 101-108
Closed Access | Times Cited: 12
Overmarking behaviour of zebra males: no scent masking, but a group cohesion function across three species
Jan Pluháček, Vladimíra Tučková, Sarah R. B. King
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology (2019) Vol. 73, Iss. 10
Closed Access | Times Cited: 6
Prolactin and Testosterone Mediate Seasonal Differences in Male Preferences for the Odors of Females and the Attractiveness of Male Odors to Females
Stuart T. Leonard, Michael H. Ferkin
Springer eBooks (1999), pp. 437-443
Closed Access | Times Cited: 8
Relative Dominance Affects Use of Scent‐Marked Areas in Male Snow Voles Chionomys nivalis
Juán José Luque-Larena, Pílar López, Joaquím Gosálbez
Ethology (2002) Vol. 108, Iss. 3, pp. 273-285
Closed Access | Times Cited: 7
Male Dominance and Female Chemosensory Preferences in the Rock-dwelling Snow Vole
Juán José Luque-Larena, Joaquím Gosálbez, Pílar López
Behaviour (2003) Vol. 140, Iss. 5, pp. 665-681
Closed Access | Times Cited: 6
Urine marking in male common voles: Does behavioural activity matter?
Petra Lantová, Lenka Brixová, Vojtěch Lanta
Behavioural Processes (2012) Vol. 90, Iss. 2, pp. 174-179
Closed Access
Meadow voles differentiate between scents of different sources
Sarah S. Garris, Lyndsey M. Pierson, Michael H. Ferkin
Behaviour (2021) Vol. 159, Iss. 5, pp. 463-489
Closed Access
Page 1

Scroll to top