Open Access Helper

OpenAlex Citation Counts

OpenAlex Citations Logo

OpenAlex is a bibliographic catalogue of scientific papers, authors and institutions accessible in open access mode, named after the Library of Alexandria. It's citation coverage is excellent and I hope you will find utility in this listing of citing articles!

If you click the article title, you'll navigate to the article, as listed in CrossRef. If you click the Open Access links, you'll navigate to the "best Open Access location". Clicking the citation count will open this listing for that article. Lastly at the bottom of the page, you'll find basic pagination options.

Requested Article:

Pursuing best practices for minimizing wild bee captures to support biological research
Ana Montero‐Castaño, Jonathan B. Koch, Thuy‐Tien Thai Lindsay, et al.
Conservation Science and Practice (2022) Vol. 4, Iss. 7
Open Access | Times Cited: 22

Showing 22 citing articles:

Utilising affordable smartphones and open-source time-lapse photography for pollinator image collection and annotation
Valentin Ştefan, Aspen Workman, Jared C. Cobain, et al.
Journal of Pollination Ecology (2025) Vol. 37, pp. 1-21
Open Access | Times Cited: 1
Effects of study design parameters on estimates of bee abundance and richness in agroecosystems: a meta-analysis
Hannah K. Levenson, Bradley N. Metz, David R. Tarpy
Annals of the Entomological Society of America (2024) Vol. 117, Iss. 2, pp. 92-106
Open Access | Times Cited: 5
Is it time for insect researchers to consider their subjects’ welfare?
Andrew Crump, Matilda Gibbons, Meghan Barrett, et al.
PLoS Biology (2023) Vol. 21, Iss. 6, pp. e3002138-e3002138
Open Access | Times Cited: 15
Informing policy and practice on insect pollinator declines: Tensions between conservation and animal welfare
Meghan Barrett, Bob Fischer, Stephen L. Buchmann
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution (2023) Vol. 10
Open Access | Times Cited: 14
The case for open research in entomology: Reducing harm, refining reproducibility and advancing insect science
Jordan P. Cuff, Meghan Barrett, Helen Gray, et al.
Agricultural and Forest Entomology (2024) Vol. 26, Iss. 3, pp. 285-295
Open Access | Times Cited: 4
Comparison of the efficacy and ethicality of pitfall and vacuum sampling in the collection of spiders (Araneae) in grassland environments
Trey Berry, Elizabeth Franklin, J.H. Blackburn
Arachnology (2025) Vol. 20, Iss. 1
Closed Access
Fewer bowl traps and more hand netting can increase effective number of bee species and reduce excessive captures
Diane L. Larson, Nora Pennarola, Julia B. Leone, et al.
Ecology and Evolution (2024) Vol. 14, Iss. 2
Open Access | Times Cited: 2
Distance models reveal biases associated with passive trapping methods for measuring wild bee abundance
Codey L. Mathis, Darin J. McNeil, Melanie Kammerer, et al.
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution (2024) Vol. 12
Open Access | Times Cited: 2
Bee monitoring by community scientists: comparing a collections-based program with iNaturalist
Nash E. Turley, Sarah E Kania, Isabella R. Petitta, et al.
Annals of the Entomological Society of America (2024) Vol. 117, Iss. 4, pp. 220-233
Open Access | Times Cited: 2
Quantifying effectiveness and best practices for bumblebee identification from photographs
Anne M. Colgan, Richard G. Hatfield, Aisling M. Dolan, et al.
Scientific Reports (2024) Vol. 14, Iss. 1
Open Access | Times Cited: 1
Squished Bugs
Kaitlin Stack Whitney, Kristoffer Whitney
Environmental Humanities (2024) Vol. 16, Iss. 1, pp. 211-229
Open Access | Times Cited: 1
Entomological Sample Sizes Should Be Lagom
Craig D. Perl, Bob Fischer
American Entomologist (2024) Vol. 70, Iss. 2, pp. 42-45
Closed Access | Times Cited: 1
Fecal sampling protocol to assess bumble bee health in conservation research
Mathilde L. Tissier, Cole Blair, Sarah MacKell, et al.
Journal of Pollination Ecology (2024) Vol. 35, pp. 122-134
Open Access | Times Cited: 1
Identifying trends in reporting on the ethical treatment of insects in research
Craig D. Perl, Cat Kissinger, R. Keating Godfrey, et al.
(2024)
Open Access | Times Cited: 1
Combining community science and taxonomist expertise for large‐scale monitoring of insect pollinators: Perspective and insights from Abeilles citoyennes
Sabrina Rondeau, Amélie Gervais, Anne Lebœuf, et al.
Conservation Science and Practice (2023) Vol. 5, Iss. 10
Open Access | Times Cited: 2
Utilising affordable smartphones and open-source time-lapse photography for monitoring pollinators
Valentin Ştefan, Aspen Workman, Jared C. Cobain, et al.
bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (2024)
Open Access
Conserving Bumble Bee (Bombus) Biodiversity in the Appalachian Region: Techniques for Non-Lethal Bumble Bee-Monitoring Surveys in the Appalachian Range of Rusty Patched Bumble Bee (B. Affinis)
Mark J. Hepner
Northeastern Naturalist (2024) Vol. 31, Iss. 1
Closed Access
Human-Invertebrate Relations and the Invertebrate Justice Model
Russil Durrant
(2024), pp. 235-297
Closed Access
Ethical issues in lethal insect monitoring
Meghan Barrett, Bob Fischer
Current Opinion in Insect Science (2024) Vol. 66, pp. 101279-101279
Closed Access
Comparing species richness and abundance of bumble bees between urban and natural areas using a photographic survey approach
John K. MacLeod, Marina Silva-Opps, Javier More Sánchez
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution (2024) Vol. 12
Open Access
A call for standardization in wild bee data collection and curation
Hannah K. Levenson, Brianne Du Clos, Tamara Smith, et al.
Journal of Melittology (2024), Iss. 123
Open Access
A case for occupancy as a state variable for wild bee monitoring
Clint R. V. Otto, S. Hollis Woodard, Larissa L. Bailey
Biological Conservation (2024) Vol. 302, pp. 110932-110932
Open Access
A non-destructive method to detect pathogens in bumble bees for conservation research
Mathilde L. Tissier, Cole Blair, Sarah MacKell, et al.
Research Square (Research Square) (2023)
Open Access | Times Cited: 1
Page 1

Scroll to top