Open Access Helper

OpenAlex Citation Counts

OpenAlex Citations Logo

OpenAlex is a bibliographic catalogue of scientific papers, authors and institutions accessible in open access mode, named after the Library of Alexandria. It's citation coverage is excellent and I hope you will find utility in this listing of citing articles!

If you click the article title, you'll navigate to the article, as listed in CrossRef. If you click the Open Access links, you'll navigate to the "best Open Access location". Clicking the citation count will open this listing for that article. Lastly at the bottom of the page, you'll find basic pagination options.

Requested Article:

Can Democratic Principles Protect High Courts from Partisan Backlash? Public Reactions to the Kenyan Supreme Court's Role in the 2017 Election Crisis
Brandon L. Bartels, Jeremy Horowitz, Eric Kramon
American Journal of Political Science (2021) Vol. 67, Iss. 3, pp. 790-807
Closed Access | Times Cited: 21

Showing 21 citing articles:

Losing legitimacy: The challenges of the Dobbs ruling to conventional legitimacy theory
James L. Gibson
American Journal of Political Science (2024) Vol. 68, Iss. 3, pp. 1041-1056
Open Access | Times Cited: 16
Where Are the Sore Losers? Competitive Authoritarianism, Incumbent Defeat, and Electoral Trust in Zambia’s 2021 Election
Nicholas Kerr, Matthias Krönke, Michael Wahman
Public Opinion Quarterly (2024) Vol. 88, Iss. SI, pp. 608-631
Open Access | Times Cited: 13
Partisanship, pragmatism, or idealism? Evaluating public support for backlashes against international courts in backsliding democracies
Sivaram Cheruvu, Jay Krehbiel, Samantha Mussell
Journal of European Public Policy (2024), pp. 1-31
Closed Access | Times Cited: 8
Public (In)Tolerance of Government Non‐Compliance with High Court Decisions
Amanda Driscoll, Aylin Aydın-Çakır, Susanne Schorpp
Comparative Politics (2024) Vol. 57, Iss. 1, pp. 71-90
Closed Access | Times Cited: 5
Framing the Judiciary: Effects of Partisan, Procedural, and Populist Frames on Apex Court Perceptions in Czechia
Alisher Juzgenbayev
Journal of Law and Courts (2025), pp. 1-25
Open Access
Awareness of Executive Interference and the Demand for Judicial Independence: Evidence from Four Constitutional Courts
Martín Gandur, Taylor Kinsley Chewning, Amanda Driscoll
Journal of Law and Courts (2025), pp. 1-26
Closed Access
Do Citizens in Backsliding Democracies Support International Courts’ Judicial Power? Evidence from Hungary
Sivaram Cheruvu, Jay Krehbiel
Journal of Law and Courts (2025), pp. 1-18
Closed Access
Can the Supreme Court Generate Public Acceptance of Election Rulings? Politicized Appointments, Elite Norm Violations, and the 2020 Election
Brandon L. Bartels, Eric Kramon
Journal of Law and Courts (2025), pp. 1-22
Closed Access
Accountability for Court Packing
Michael J. Nelson, Amanda Driscoll
Journal of Law and Courts (2023) Vol. 11, Iss. 2, pp. 290-311
Open Access | Times Cited: 9
Do Preliminary References Increase Public Support for European Law? Experimental Evidence from Germany
Sivaram Cheruvu, Jay Krehbiel
International Organization (2024) Vol. 78, Iss. 1, pp. 170-187
Open Access | Times Cited: 3
On motives and means: how approach and justification for court-curbing impact public trust
Aylin Aydın-Çakır, Amanda Driscoll
Democratization (2024), pp. 1-25
Open Access | Times Cited: 2
Education, public support for institutions, and the separation of powers
Sivaram Cheruvu
Political Science Research and Methods (2022) Vol. 11, Iss. 3, pp. 570-587
Open Access | Times Cited: 11
Transition 2.0

Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG eBooks (2023)
Open Access | Times Cited: 6
Do Preliminary References Increase Public Support for European Law? Experimental Evidence from Germany
Sivaram Cheruvu, Jay Krehbiel
SSRN Electronic Journal (2023)
Closed Access | Times Cited: 3
Threats to Judicial Independence
Alex Schwartz
Oxford University Press eBooks (2024), pp. 729-746
Closed Access
How Clientelism Works: Evidence from the Barinas Special Election
Francisco Rodríguez
SSRN Electronic Journal (2024)
Closed Access
How clientelism works: Evidence from the Barinas special election
Francisco Rodríguez
World Development (2024) Vol. 184, pp. 106734-106734
Open Access
Framing the Judiciary: Effects of Partisan, Procedural, and Populist Frames on Apex Court Perceptions in Czechia
Alisher Juzgenbayev
(2024)
Closed Access
Do Politicized Domestic Courts Undermine Public Support for International Law?
Sivaram Cheruvu, Jay Krehbiel
SSRN Electronic Journal (2023)
Closed Access | Times Cited: 1
Reducing Attrition in Phone-based Panel Surveys: A Web Application to Facilitate Best Practices and Semi-Automate Survey Workflow
Ala’ Alrababa’h, Marine Casalis, Daniel Masterson, et al.
(2023)
Open Access
Losing Legitimacy: Has Dobbs Undermined Popular Support for the U.S Supreme Court?
James L. Gibson
SSRN Electronic Journal (2022)
Closed Access
Page 1

Scroll to top