Open Access Helper

OpenAlex Citation Counts

OpenAlex Citations Logo

OpenAlex is a bibliographic catalogue of scientific papers, authors and institutions accessible in open access mode, named after the Library of Alexandria. It's citation coverage is excellent and I hope you will find utility in this listing of citing articles!

If you click the article title, you'll navigate to the article, as listed in CrossRef. If you click the Open Access links, you'll navigate to the "best Open Access location". Clicking the citation count will open this listing for that article. Lastly at the bottom of the page, you'll find basic pagination options.

Requested Article:

The Mass Production of Redundant, Misleading, and Conflicted Systematic Reviews and Meta‐analyses
John P. A. Ioannidis
Milbank Quarterly (2016) Vol. 94, Iss. 3, pp. 485-514
Open Access | Times Cited: 1177

Showing 1-25 of 1177 citing articles:

A communal catalogue reveals Earth’s multiscale microbial diversity
Luke Thompson, Jon G. Sanders, Daniel McDonald, et al.
Nature (2017) Vol. 551, Iss. 7681, pp. 457-463
Open Access | Times Cited: 2298
Meta-analysis and the science of research synthesis
Jessica Gurevitch, Julia Koricheva, Shinichi Nakagawa, et al.
Nature (2018) Vol. 555, Iss. 7695, pp. 175-182
Closed Access | Times Cited: 1325
SANRA—a scale for the quality assessment of narrative review articles
Christopher Baethge, Sandra Goldbeck-Wood, Stephan Mertens
Research Integrity and Peer Review (2019) Vol. 4, Iss. 1
Open Access | Times Cited: 1146
Mendelian randomization
Eleanor Sanderson, M. Maria Glymour, Michael V. Holmes, et al.
Nature Reviews Methods Primers (2022) Vol. 2, Iss. 1
Open Access | Times Cited: 1133
What kind of systematic review should I conduct? A proposed typology and guidance for systematic reviewers in the medical and health sciences
Zachary Munn, Cindy Stern, Edoardo Aromataris, et al.
BMC Medical Research Methodology (2018) Vol. 18, Iss. 1
Open Access | Times Cited: 795
Time to challenge the spurious hierarchy of systematic over narrative reviews?
Trisha Greenhalgh, Sally Thorne, Kirsti Malterud
European Journal of Clinical Investigation (2018) Vol. 48, Iss. 6
Open Access | Times Cited: 677
Two-sample Mendelian randomization: avoiding the downsides of a powerful, widely applicable but potentially fallible technique
Fernando Pires Hartwig, Neil M Davies, Gibran Hemani, et al.
International Journal of Epidemiology (2016) Vol. 45, Iss. 6, pp. 1717-1726
Open Access | Times Cited: 657
Evaluations of the uptake and impact of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement and extensions: a scoping review
Matthew J. Page, David Moher
Systematic Reviews (2017) Vol. 6, Iss. 1
Open Access | Times Cited: 588
The gut microbiota: A key factor in the therapeutic effects of (poly)phenols
Juan Carlos Espı́n, Antonio González‐Sarrías, Francisco A. Tómas‐Barberán
Biochemical Pharmacology (2017) Vol. 139, pp. 82-93
Closed Access | Times Cited: 505
How to properly use the PRISMA Statement
Rafael Sarkis‐Onofre, Ferrán Catalá-López, Edoardo Aromataris, et al.
Systematic Reviews (2021) Vol. 10, Iss. 1
Open Access | Times Cited: 497
Ten simple rules for conducting umbrella reviews
Paolo Fusar‐Poli, Joaquim Raduà
Evidence-Based Mental Health (2018) Vol. 21, Iss. 3, pp. 95-100
Open Access | Times Cited: 485
What causes psychosis? An umbrella review of risk and protective factors
Joaquim Raduà, Valentina Ramella‐Cravaro, John P. A. Ioannidis, et al.
World Psychiatry (2018) Vol. 17, Iss. 1, pp. 49-66
Open Access | Times Cited: 469
Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies (PRISMA-DTA): explanation, elaboration, and checklist
Jean‐Paul Salameh, Patrick M. Bossuyt, Trevor A. McGrath, et al.
BMJ (2020), pp. m2632-m2632
Open Access | Times Cited: 448
Meta-evaluation of meta-analysis: ten appraisal questions for biologists
Shinichi Nakagawa, Daniel W. A. Noble, Alistair M. Senior, et al.
BMC Biology (2017) Vol. 15, Iss. 1
Open Access | Times Cited: 439
Dietary fiber and health outcomes: an umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses
Nicola Veronese, Marco Solmi, Maria Gabriella Caruso, et al.
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition (2018) Vol. 107, Iss. 3, pp. 436-444
Open Access | Times Cited: 417
On doing better science: From thrill of discovery to policy implications
John Antonakis
The Leadership Quarterly (2017) Vol. 28, Iss. 1, pp. 5-21
Open Access | Times Cited: 410
Reporting guideline for overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions: development of the PRIOR statement
Michelle Gates, Allison Gates, Dawid Pieper, et al.
BMJ (2022), pp. e070849-e070849
Open Access | Times Cited: 373
Prevention of Psychosis
Paolo Fusar‐Poli, Gonzalo Salazar de Pablo, Christoph U. Correll, et al.
JAMA Psychiatry (2020) Vol. 77, Iss. 7, pp. 755-755
Closed Access | Times Cited: 369
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta‐analyses in ecology and evolutionary biology: a PRISMA extension
Rose E. O’Dea, Malgorzata Lagisz, Michael D. Jennions, et al.
Biological reviews/Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society (2021) Vol. 96, Iss. 5, pp. 1695-1722
Open Access | Times Cited: 369
Registration of systematic reviews in PROSPERO: 30,000 records and counting
Matthew J. Page, Larissa Shamseer, Andrea C. Tricco
Systematic Reviews (2018) Vol. 7, Iss. 1
Open Access | Times Cited: 364
Preventive psychiatry: a blueprint for improving the mental health of young people
Paolo Fusar‐Poli, Christoph U. Correll, Celso Arango, et al.
World Psychiatry (2021) Vol. 20, Iss. 2, pp. 200-221
Open Access | Times Cited: 316
Statistical Inference as Severe Testing
Deborah G. Mayo
(2018)
Open Access | Times Cited: 308
The Neurocognitive Profile of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: A Review of Meta-Analyses
Michelle A. Pievsky, Robert E. McGrath
Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology (2017) Vol. 33, Iss. 2, pp. 143-157
Open Access | Times Cited: 304
Serum uric acid levels and multiple health outcomes: umbrella review of evidence from observational studies, randomised controlled trials, and Mendelian randomisation studies
Xue Li, Xiangrui Meng, Maria Timofeeva, et al.
BMJ (2017), pp. j2376-j2376
Open Access | Times Cited: 294
Registration in the international prospective register of systematic reviews (PROSPERO) of systematic review protocols was associated with increased review quality
Sofia Sideri, Spyridon N. Papageorgiou, Theodore Eliades
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology (2018) Vol. 100, pp. 103-110
Open Access | Times Cited: 283
Page 1 - Next Page

Scroll to top