Open Access Helper

OpenAlex Citation Counts

OpenAlex Citations Logo

OpenAlex is a bibliographic catalogue of scientific papers, authors and institutions accessible in open access mode, named after the Library of Alexandria. It's citation coverage is excellent and I hope you will find utility in this listing of citing articles!

If you click the article title, you'll navigate to the article, as listed in CrossRef. If you click the Open Access links, you'll navigate to the "best Open Access location". Clicking the citation count will open this listing for that article. Lastly at the bottom of the page, you'll find basic pagination options.

Requested Article:

A mammoth undertaking: harnessing insight from functional ecology to shape de‐extinction priority setting
Douglas J. McCauley, Molly Hardesty‐Moore, Benjamin S. Halpern, et al.
Functional Ecology (2016) Vol. 31, Iss. 5, pp. 1003-1011
Open Access | Times Cited: 49

Showing 1-25 of 49 citing articles:

How genomics can help biodiversity conservation
Kathrin Theißinger, Carlos Fernandes, Giulio Formenti, et al.
Trends in Genetics (2023) Vol. 39, Iss. 7, pp. 545-559
Open Access | Times Cited: 182
A global ecological signal of extinction risk in terrestrial vertebrates
Maya Munstermann, Noel A. Heim, Douglas J. McCauley, et al.
Conservation Biology (2021) Vol. 36, Iss. 3
Open Access | Times Cited: 69
Harnessing the omics revolution to address the global biodiversity crisis
Luis F. De León, Bruna Silva, Kevin J. Avilés‐Rodríguez, et al.
Current Opinion in Biotechnology (2023) Vol. 80, pp. 102901-102901
Closed Access | Times Cited: 18
Cloning for the Twenty-First Century and Its Place in Endangered Species Conservation
Veronica B. Cowl, Pierre Comizzoli, Ruth Appeltant, et al.
Annual Review of Animal Biosciences (2023) Vol. 12, Iss. 1, pp. 91-112
Open Access | Times Cited: 16
De-Extinction
Ben J. Novak
Genes (2018) Vol. 9, Iss. 11, pp. 548-548
Open Access | Times Cited: 53
Philosophy and ethics of de-extinction
Jay Odenbaugh
Cambridge Prisms Extinction (2023) Vol. 1
Open Access | Times Cited: 15
Spending limited resources on de-extinction could lead to net biodiversity loss
Joseph Bennett, Richard F. Maloney, Tammy E. Steeves, et al.
Nature Ecology & Evolution (2017) Vol. 1, Iss. 4
Closed Access | Times Cited: 45
If I Could Talk to the Animals: Measuring Subjective Animal Welfare
Heather Browning
(2019)
Closed Access | Times Cited: 39
Building genomes to understand biology
Alessandro Luis Venega Coradini, Cara Hull, Ian M. Ehrenreich
Nature Communications (2020) Vol. 11, Iss. 1
Open Access | Times Cited: 38
Who to revive? Explaining charismatic species bias in the selection of de-extinction candidate species
Tessa Molhuizen, Koen Beumer, Ine Dorresteijn
Environment and Planning E Nature and Space (2025)
Closed Access
Current and future challenges to conservation translocations
Philip J. Seddon, Kent H. Redford
(2025)
Closed Access
The overkill model and its impact on environmental research
Lisa Nagaoka, Torben C. Rick, Steve Wolverton
Ecology and Evolution (2018) Vol. 8, Iss. 19, pp. 9683-9696
Open Access | Times Cited: 37
Won’t Somebody Please Think of the Mammoths? De-extinction and Animal Welfare
Heather Browning
Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics (2018) Vol. 31, Iss. 6, pp. 785-803
Open Access | Times Cited: 36
An Analysis of Potential Ethical Justifications for Mammoth De-extinction And a Call for Empirical Research
Yasha Rohwer, Emma Marris
Ethics Policy & Environment (2018) Vol. 21, Iss. 1, pp. 127-142
Closed Access | Times Cited: 32
Reintroduction of at-risk forest tree species using biotechnology depends on regulatory policy, informed by science and with public support
Douglass F. Jacobs, R. Kasten Dumroese, Andrea N. Brennan, et al.
New Forests (2023) Vol. 54, Iss. 4, pp. 587-604
Open Access | Times Cited: 8
Maximising evolutionary potential in functional proxies for extinct species: a conservation genetic perspective on de‐extinction
Tammy E. Steeves, Jeff Johnson, Marie L. Hale
Functional Ecology (2017) Vol. 31, Iss. 5, pp. 1032-1040
Open Access | Times Cited: 28
De-extinction and Deep Questions About Species Conservation
Christian Diehm
Ethics Policy & Environment (2017) Vol. 20, Iss. 1, pp. 25-28
Closed Access | Times Cited: 27
Diverse effects of the common hippopotamus on plant communities and soil chemistry
Douglas J. McCauley, Stuart Graham, Todd E. Dawson, et al.
Oecologia (2018) Vol. 188, Iss. 3, pp. 821-835
Closed Access | Times Cited: 24
Nature 4.0: Assisted Evolution, De-extinction, and Ecological Restoration Technologies
Leslie Paul Thiele
Global Environmental Politics (2020) Vol. 20, Iss. 3, pp. 9-27
Open Access | Times Cited: 17
The ecology of de‐extinction
Philip J. Seddon
Functional Ecology (2017) Vol. 31, Iss. 5, pp. 992-995
Open Access | Times Cited: 14
Anticipating risks, governance needs, and public perceptions of de-extinction
Rene X. Valdez, Jennifer Kuzma, Christopher Cummings, et al.
Journal of Responsible Innovation (2019) Vol. 6, Iss. 2, pp. 211-231
Open Access | Times Cited: 12
Anabiosis and the Liminal Geographies of De/extinction
Adam Searle
Environmental Humanities (2020) Vol. 12, Iss. 1, pp. 321-345
Open Access | Times Cited: 12
The ghost of a giant – Six hypotheses for how an extinct megaherbivore structured kelp forests across the North Pacific Rim
Cameron D. Bullen, Alberto Alves Campos, Edward J. Gregr, et al.
Global Ecology and Biogeography (2021) Vol. 30, Iss. 10, pp. 2101-2118
Closed Access | Times Cited: 11
Using De-extinction to Create Extinct Species Proxies; Natural History not Included
Patrice Kohl
Ethics Policy & Environment (2017) Vol. 20, Iss. 1, pp. 15-17
Closed Access | Times Cited: 12
Spaceship Earth Revisited: The Co-Benefits of Overcoming Biological Extinction of Experience at the Level of Person, Place and Planet
Susan L. Prescott, Jeffrey S Bland
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (2020) Vol. 17, Iss. 4, pp. 1407-1407
Open Access | Times Cited: 11
Page 1 - Next Page

Scroll to top