Open Access Helper

OpenAlex Citation Counts

OpenAlex Citations Logo

OpenAlex is a bibliographic catalogue of scientific papers, authors and institutions accessible in open access mode, named after the Library of Alexandria. It's citation coverage is excellent and I hope you will find utility in this listing of citing articles!

If you click the article title, you'll navigate to the article, as listed in CrossRef. If you click the Open Access links, you'll navigate to the "best Open Access location". Clicking the citation count will open this listing for that article. Lastly at the bottom of the page, you'll find basic pagination options.

Requested Article:

Post-publication critique at top-ranked journals across scientific disciplines: a cross-sectional assessment of policies and practice
Tom E Hardwicke, Robert T. Thibault, Jessica E. Kosie, et al.
Royal Society Open Science (2022) Vol. 9, Iss. 8
Open Access | Times Cited: 27

Showing 1-25 of 27 citing articles:

Linking citation and retraction data reveals the demographics of scientific retractions among highly cited authors
John P. A. Ioannidis, Angelo Maria Pezzullo, Antonio Cristiano, et al.
PLoS Biology (2025) Vol. 23, Iss. 1, pp. e3002999-e3002999
Open Access | Times Cited: 1
A guide for social science journal editors on easing into open science
Priya Silverstein, Colin Elman, Amanda Kay Montoya, et al.
Research Integrity and Peer Review (2024) Vol. 9, Iss. 1
Open Access | Times Cited: 10
Updated science-wide author databases of standardized citation indicators including retraction data
John P. A. Ioannidis, Angelo Maria Pezzullo, Antonio Cristiano, et al.
bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (2024)
Open Access | Times Cited: 10
Los desafíos de la revisión por pares: cómo garantizar la calidad y transparencia del proceso editorial de las revistas científicas
Cristina Candal‐Pedreira, Julia Rey-Brandariz, Leonor Varela‐Lema, et al.
Anales de Pediatría (2023) Vol. 99, Iss. 1, pp. 54-59
Open Access | Times Cited: 16
Post-publication Peer Review with an Intention to Uncover Data/Result Irregularities and Potential Research Misconduct in Scientific Research: Vigilantism or Volunteerism?
Nicole Shu Ling Yeo-Teh, Bor Luen Tang
Science and Engineering Ethics (2023) Vol. 29, Iss. 4
Closed Access | Times Cited: 15
Post-publication peer review and the identification of methodological and reporting issues in COVID-19 trials: a qualitative study
Mauricia Davidson, Christoffer Bruun Korfitsen, Carolina Riveros, et al.
BMJ evidence-based medicine (2025), pp. bmjebm-113068
Closed Access
Why Trust Adversarial Justice?
Jason Chin
(2025)
Closed Access
Constructive and obsessive criticism in science
Vinay Prasad, John P. A. Ioannidis
European Journal of Clinical Investigation (2022) Vol. 52, Iss. 11
Open Access | Times Cited: 19
Application of AI in Sepsis: Citation Network Analysis and Evidence Synthesis
M. Wu, Md. Mohaimenul Islam, Tahmina Nasrin Poly, et al.
Interactive Journal of Medical Research (2024) Vol. 13, pp. e54490-e54490
Open Access | Times Cited: 3
Challenges in peer review: how to guarantee the quality and transparency of the editorial process in scientific journals
Cristina Candal‐Pedreira, Julia Rey-Brandariz, Leonor Varela‐Lema, et al.
Anales de Pediatría (English Edition) (2023) Vol. 99, Iss. 1, pp. 54-59
Open Access | Times Cited: 8
How do we increase the trustworthiness of medical publications?
Ben W. Mol, John P. A. Ioannidis
Fertility and Sterility (2023) Vol. 120, Iss. 3, pp. 412-414
Open Access | Times Cited: 7
Scientific commentaries are dealing with uncertainty and complexity in science
Shuang Wang, Xin He, Jian Du
Information Processing & Management (2024) Vol. 61, Iss. 4, pp. 103707-103707
Open Access | Times Cited: 2
PubMed captures more fine-grained bibliographic data on scientific commentary than Web of Science: a comparative analysis
Shuang Wang, Kai Zhang, Jian Du
BMJ Health & Care Informatics (2024) Vol. 31, Iss. 1, pp. e101017-e101017
Closed Access | Times Cited: 1
(FULL GUIDE) A Guide for Social Science Journal Editors on Easing into Open Science
Priya Silverstein, Colin Elman, Amanda Kay Montoya, et al.
(2023)
Open Access | Times Cited: 3
Should editors with multiple retractions or a record of academic misconduct serve on journal editorial boards?
J. A. Teixeira da Silva
Science Editor and Publisher (2024) Vol. 8, Iss. 1, pp. 46-49
Open Access
Better nanoscience through open, collaborative, and critical discussions
Nathanne Cristina Vilela Rost, Maha Said, Mustafa Gharib, et al.
Materials Horizons (2024) Vol. 11, Iss. 13, pp. 3005-3010
Open Access
Exploring Social Critique in the Literary Work of Film: Ali & Ratu Queens through Bourdieu's Sociological Theory
Adhisa Nur Aini, Fitri Amilia, Dzarna Dzarna, et al.
Journal of Language and Literature Studies (2024) Vol. 4, Iss. 4, pp. 847-858
Closed Access
Methodological rigor and quality of reporting of clinical trials published with physical activity interventions: A report from the Strengthening the Evidence in Exercise Sciences Initiative (SEES Initiative)
Andresa Conrado Ignacio, Nórton Luís Oliveira, Larissa Xavier Neves da Silva, et al.
PLoS ONE (2024) Vol. 19, Iss. 8, pp. e0309087-e0309087
Open Access
The research literature is an unsafe workplace
Jennifer A. Byrne, Adrian Barnett
Accountability in Research (2024), pp. 1-8
Open Access
Inaccuracy in the Scientific Record and Open Postpublication Critique
Chris R. Brewin
Perspectives on Psychological Science (2023) Vol. 18, Iss. 5, pp. 1244-1253
Open Access | Times Cited: 1
Research misconduct as a challenge for academic institutions and scientific journals
Cristina Candal‐Pedreira, Joseph S. Ross, Ana Marušić, et al.
Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health (2023) Vol. 78, Iss. 1, pp. 61-64
Closed Access | Times Cited: 1
Special issue on reliability of infant research
Moin Syed
Infant and Child Development (2022) Vol. 31, Iss. 5
Closed Access | Times Cited: 2
Scientific Journals Should Encourage, Not Hinder, Debates About Their Published Papers.
Eleftherios P. Diamandis
PubMed (2023) Vol. 34, Iss. 1, pp. 81-84
Closed Access
Methodological Rigor and Quality of Reporting of Clinical Trials Published with Physical Activity Interventions: A Report from the Strengthening the Evidence in Exercise Sciences Initiative (SEES Initiative)
Andresa Conrado Ignacio, Nórton Luís Oliveira, Larissa Xavier Neves da Silva, et al.
Research Square (Research Square) (2023)
Open Access
Page 1 - Next Page

Scroll to top