Open Access Helper

OpenAlex Citation Counts

OpenAlex Citations Logo

OpenAlex is a bibliographic catalogue of scientific papers, authors and institutions accessible in open access mode, named after the Library of Alexandria. It's citation coverage is excellent and I hope you will find utility in this listing of citing articles!

If you click the article title, you'll navigate to the article, as listed in CrossRef. If you click the Open Access links, you'll navigate to the "best Open Access location". Clicking the citation count will open this listing for that article. Lastly at the bottom of the page, you'll find basic pagination options.

Requested Article:

Data availability, reusability, and analytic reproducibility: evaluating the impact of a mandatory open data policy at the journal Cognition
Tom E Hardwicke, Maya B Mathur, Kyle MacDonald, et al.
Royal Society Open Science (2018) Vol. 5, Iss. 8, pp. 180448-180448
Open Access | Times Cited: 282

Showing 1-25 of 282 citing articles:

Replicability, Robustness, and Reproducibility in Psychological Science
Brian A. Nosek, Tom E Hardwicke, Hannah Moshontz, et al.
Annual Review of Psychology (2021) Vol. 73, Iss. 1, pp. 719-748
Open Access | Times Cited: 447
The past, present and future of Registered Reports
Chris Chambers, Loukia Tzavella
Nature Human Behaviour (2021) Vol. 6, Iss. 1, pp. 29-42
Open Access | Times Cited: 336
The citation advantage of linking publications to research data
Giovanni Colavizza, Iain Hrynaszkiewicz, Isla Staden, et al.
PLoS ONE (2020) Vol. 15, Iss. 4, pp. e0230416-e0230416
Open Access | Times Cited: 276
Data sharing practices and data availability upon request differ across scientific disciplines
Leho Tedersoo, Rainer Küngas, Ester Oras, et al.
Scientific Data (2021) Vol. 8, Iss. 1
Open Access | Times Cited: 254
Directions in abusive language training data, a systematic review: Garbage in, garbage out
Bertie Vidgen, Leon Derczynski
PLoS ONE (2020) Vol. 15, Iss. 12, pp. e0243300-e0243300
Open Access | Times Cited: 240
A Practical Guide for Transparency in Psychological Science
Olivier Klein, Tom E Hardwicke, Frederik Aust, et al.
Collabra Psychology (2018) Vol. 4, Iss. 1
Open Access | Times Cited: 222
An empirical assessment of transparency and reproducibility-related research practices in the social sciences (2014–2017)
Tom E Hardwicke, Joshua D. Wallach, Mallory C. Kidwell, et al.
Royal Society Open Science (2020) Vol. 7, Iss. 2, pp. 190806-190806
Open Access | Times Cited: 142
Estimating the Prevalence of Transparency and Reproducibility-Related Research Practices in Psychology (2014–2017)
Tom E Hardwicke, Robert T. Thibault, Jessica E. Kosie, et al.
Perspectives on Psychological Science (2021) Vol. 17, Iss. 1, pp. 239-251
Open Access | Times Cited: 135
Same data, different conclusions: Radical dispersion in empirical results when independent analysts operationalize and test the same hypothesis
Martin Schweinsberg, Michael B. Feldman, Nicola Staub, et al.
Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes (2021) Vol. 165, pp. 228-249
Open Access | Times Cited: 102
The Benefits, Barriers, and Risks of Big-Team Science
Patrick S. Forscher, Eric‐Jan Wagenmakers, Nicholas A. Coles, et al.
Perspectives on Psychological Science (2022) Vol. 18, Iss. 3, pp. 607-623
Open Access | Times Cited: 84
Common methodological mistakes
Jesper Wulff, Gwendolin B. Sajons, Ganna Pogrebna, et al.
The Leadership Quarterly (2023) Vol. 34, Iss. 1, pp. 101677-101677
Closed Access | Times Cited: 53
Empirical evidence of widespread exaggeration bias and selective reporting in ecology
Kaitlin Kimmel, Meghan L. Avolio, Paul J. Ferraro
Nature Ecology & Evolution (2023) Vol. 7, Iss. 9, pp. 1525-1536
Closed Access | Times Cited: 47
The dire disregard of measurement invariance testing in psychological science.
Esther Maassen, E. Damiano D’Urso, Marcel A. L. M. van Assen, et al.
Psychological Methods (2023)
Open Access | Times Cited: 44
Data, measurement and empirical methods in the science of science
Lu Liu, Benjamin F. Jones, Brian Uzzi, et al.
Nature Human Behaviour (2023) Vol. 7, Iss. 7, pp. 1046-1058
Open Access | Times Cited: 42
From social media to artificial intelligence: improving research on digital harms in youth
Karen Mansfield, Sakshi Ghai, Thomas Hakman, et al.
The Lancet Child & Adolescent Health (2025)
Closed Access | Times Cited: 2
The present and future of peer review: Ideas, interventions, and evidence
Balázs Aczél, Ann‐Sophie Barwich, Amanda B. Diekman, et al.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (2025) Vol. 122, Iss. 5
Open Access | Times Cited: 1
Analysis of Open Data and Computational Reproducibility in Registered Reports in Psychology
Pepijn Obels, Daniël Lakens, Nicholas A. Coles, et al.
Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science (2020) Vol. 3, Iss. 2, pp. 229-237
Open Access | Times Cited: 105
Replicability, Robustness, and Reproducibility in Psychological Science
Brian A. Nosek, Tom E Hardwicke, Hannah Moshontz, et al.
(2021)
Open Access | Times Cited: 87
Analytic reproducibility in articles receiving open data badges at the journal Psychological Science : an observational study
Tom E Hardwicke, Manuel Bohn, Kyle MacDonald, et al.
Royal Society Open Science (2021) Vol. 8, Iss. 1
Open Access | Times Cited: 85
Reveal, Don’t Conceal
Tracey L. Weissgerber, Stacey J. Winham, Ethan P. Heinzen, et al.
Circulation (2019) Vol. 140, Iss. 18, pp. 1506-1518
Open Access | Times Cited: 84
An empirical assessment of transparency and reproducibility-related research practices in the social sciences (2014-2017)
Tom E Hardwicke, Joshua D. Wallach, Mallory C. Kidwell, et al.
(2019)
Open Access | Times Cited: 80
Calibrating the Scientific Ecosystem Through Meta-Research
Tom E Hardwicke, Stylianos Serghiou, Perrine Janiaud, et al.
Annual Review of Statistics and Its Application (2019) Vol. 7, Iss. 1, pp. 11-37
Open Access | Times Cited: 77
Unravelling the health status of brachycephalic dogs in the UK using multivariable analysis
Dan G. O’Neill, Camilla Pegram, Penelope A. Crocker, et al.
Scientific Reports (2020) Vol. 10, Iss. 1
Open Access | Times Cited: 75
Why most psychological research findings are not even wrong
Anne M. Scheel
Infant and Child Development (2022) Vol. 31, Iss. 1
Open Access | Times Cited: 64
Smart bibliometrics: an integrated method of science mapping and bibliometric analysis
Vilker Zucolotto Pessin, Luciana Harue Yamane, Renato Ribeiro Siman
Scientometrics (2022) Vol. 127, Iss. 6, pp. 3695-3718
Closed Access | Times Cited: 57
Page 1 - Next Page

Scroll to top