OpenAlex Citation Counts

OpenAlex Citations Logo

OpenAlex is a bibliographic catalogue of scientific papers, authors and institutions accessible in open access mode, named after the Library of Alexandria. It's citation coverage is excellent and I hope you will find utility in this listing of citing articles!

If you click the article title, you'll navigate to the article, as listed in CrossRef. If you click the Open Access links, you'll navigate to the "best Open Access location". Clicking the citation count will open this listing for that article. Lastly at the bottom of the page, you'll find basic pagination options.

Requested Article:

“Science is Everywhere, but No One Knows It”: Assessing the Cultural Distance to Science of Rural South African Publics
Lars Guenther, Peter Weingart, Corlia Meyer
Environmental Communication (2018) Vol. 12, Iss. 8, pp. 1046-1061
Open Access | Times Cited: 22

Showing 22 citing articles:

Unveiling High Mountain Communities’ Perception of Climate Change Impact on Lives and Livelihoods in Gilgit-Baltistan: Evidence from People-Centric Approach
Amjad Ali, Rizwan Akhtar, Jamal Hussain
Environmental Communication (2023) Vol. 17, Iss. 6, pp. 602-617
Closed Access | Times Cited: 18

Beyond a single pole: exploring the nuanced coexistence of scientific elitism and populism in China
Shuo Wang, Tuo Wang, H. Yokoyama, et al.
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications (2025) Vol. 12, Iss. 1
Open Access

Audience Segments in Environmental and Science Communication: Recent Findings and Future Perspectives
Julia Metag, Mike S. Schäfer
Environmental Communication (2018) Vol. 12, Iss. 8, pp. 995-1004
Open Access | Times Cited: 58

Public online engagement with science information: on the road to a theoretical framework and a future research agenda
Monika Taddicken, Nicole Krämer
Journal of Science Communication (2021) Vol. 20, Iss. 03, pp. A05-A05
Open Access | Times Cited: 24

How representative surveys measure public (dis)trust in science: A systematisation and analysis of survey items and open-ended questions
Anne Reif, Lars Guenther
Journal of Trust Research (2021) Vol. 11, Iss. 2, pp. 94-118
Closed Access | Times Cited: 19

Science communication scholars use more and more segmentation analyses: Can we take them to the next level?
Tobias Füchslin
Public Understanding of Science (2019) Vol. 28, Iss. 7, pp. 854-864
Open Access | Times Cited: 22

“We are a Bit Blind About it”: A Qualitative Analysis of Climate Change-Related Perceptions and Communication Across South African Communities
Daniela Mahl, Lars Guenther, Mike S. Schäfer, et al.
Environmental Communication (2020) Vol. 14, Iss. 6, pp. 802-815
Open Access | Times Cited: 18

“Space means Science, unless it’s about Star Wars”: A qualitative assessment of science communication audience segments
Carmen Koch, Mirco Saner, Mike S. Schäfer, et al.
Public Understanding of Science (2019) Vol. 29, Iss. 2, pp. 157-175
Open Access | Times Cited: 16

How generative artificial intelligence portrays science: Interviewing ChatGPT from the perspective of different audience segments
Sophia Charlotte Volk, Mike S. Schäfer, Damiano Lombardi, et al.
Public Understanding of Science (2024)
Closed Access | Times Cited: 1

Dissonance and Polyphasia as Strategies for Resolving the Potential Conflict Between Science and Religion Among South Africans
Bankole Falade, Lars Guenther
Minerva (2020) Vol. 58, Iss. 3, pp. 459-480
Closed Access | Times Cited: 7

Listen to the audience(s)! Expectations and characteristics of expert debate attendants
Nina Wicke, Monika Taddicken
Journal of Science Communication (2020) Vol. 19, Iss. 04, pp. A02-A02
Open Access | Times Cited: 7

Challenges and facilitators of public engagement with water, sanitation, hygiene and other environmental health issues in Ghana and Uganda: perspectives of scientists, journalists and the public
Bernard Appiah, Anubhuti Poudyal, David Anidaso Anum, et al.
Journal of Water Sanitation and Hygiene for Development (2019) Vol. 10, Iss. 1, pp. 16-26
Open Access | Times Cited: 6

Imagining GMOs: The Chinese public's scientific perception in the digital age
Zijing Xu, Ye Lu
Cultures of Science (2019) Vol. 2, Iss. 4, pp. 241-253
Open Access | Times Cited: 5

GMO or GM No? Segmenting a consumer audience to examine their perceptions of genetically modified products
Shelli Rampold, Jamie Greig, Julia Gibson, et al.
Advancements in Agricultural Development (2023) Vol. 4, Iss. 1, pp. 48-61
Open Access | Times Cited: 1

South Africa: Science communication throughout turbulent times
Marina Joubert, Shadrack Mkansi
ANU Press eBooks (2020), pp. 771-800
Closed Access | Times Cited: 2

Segmentation Disparities in Scientific Experts’ Knowledge of and Attitudes Towards GMOs in China
Jianbin Jin, Xiaoxiao Cheng, Zhaohui Li
Springer eBooks (2021), pp. 209-232
Closed Access | Times Cited: 2

Positive but not uncritical: Perceptions of science and technology amongst South African online users
Lars Guenther, Anne Reif, Monika Taddicken, et al.
South African Journal of Science (2022) Vol. 118, Iss. 9/10
Open Access | Times Cited: 1

Page 1

Scroll to top