Open Access Helper

OpenAlex Citation Counts

OpenAlex Citations Logo

OpenAlex is a bibliographic catalogue of scientific papers, authors and institutions accessible in open access mode, named after the Library of Alexandria. It's citation coverage is excellent and I hope you will find utility in this listing of citing articles!

If you click the article title, you'll navigate to the article, as listed in CrossRef. If you click the Open Access links, you'll navigate to the "best Open Access location". Clicking the citation count will open this listing for that article. Lastly at the bottom of the page, you'll find basic pagination options.

Requested Article:

A belief systems analysis of fraud beliefs following the 2020 US election
Rotem Botvinik‐Nezer, Matt Jones, Tor D. Wager
Nature Human Behaviour (2023) Vol. 7, Iss. 7, pp. 1106-1119
Open Access | Times Cited: 15

Showing 15 citing articles:

A Network Approach to Investigate the Dynamics of Individual and Collective Beliefs: Advances and Applications of the BENDING Model
Madalina Vlasceanu, A. M. Dyckovsky, Alin Coman
Perspectives on Psychological Science (2023) Vol. 19, Iss. 2, pp. 444-453
Closed Access | Times Cited: 17
Political reinforcement learners
Lion Schulz, Rahul Bhui
Trends in Cognitive Sciences (2024) Vol. 28, Iss. 3, pp. 210-222
Open Access | Times Cited: 5
A social inference model of idealization and devaluation.
Giles W. Story, Ryan Smith, Michael Moutoussis, et al.
Psychological Review (2023) Vol. 131, Iss. 3, pp. 749-780
Open Access | Times Cited: 9
Learning from and about climate scientists
Reed Orchinik, Rachit Dubey, Samuel J. Gershman, et al.
(2023)
Open Access | Times Cited: 8
Partisans are more likely to entrench their beliefs in misinformation when political outgroup members correct claims
Diego A. Reinero, Elizabeth Ann Harris, Steve Rathje, et al.
(2023)
Open Access | Times Cited: 4
Assessing and Understanding Reactance, Self-Exemption, Disbelief, Source Derogation and Information Conflict in Reaction to Overdiagnosis in Mammography Screening: Scale Development and Preliminary Validation
Laura D. Scherer, Krithika Suresh, Carmen L. Lewis, et al.
Medical Decision Making (2023) Vol. 43, Iss. 7-8, pp. 789-802
Open Access | Times Cited: 4
Who Are the Election Skeptics? Evidence from the 2022 Midterm Elections
Derek Holliday, Justin Grimmer, Yphtach Lelkes, et al.
Election Law Journal Rules Politics and Policy (2024)
Closed Access | Times Cited: 1
How rational inference about authority debunking can curtail, sustain, or spread belief polarization
Setayesh Radkani, Marika Landau-Wells, Rebecca Saxe
PNAS Nexus (2024) Vol. 3, Iss. 10
Open Access | Times Cited: 1
Rational inference strategies and the genesis of polarization and extremism
Peter D. Kvam, Abhay Alaukik, Callie E. Mims, et al.
Scientific Reports (2022) Vol. 12, Iss. 1
Open Access | Times Cited: 7
Who are the Election Skeptics? Evidence from the 2022 Midterm Elections
Justin Grimmer, Derek Holliday, Yphtach Lelkes, et al.
(2023)
Open Access | Times Cited: 2
Understanding and Combating Misinformation: An Evolutionary Perspective (Preprint)
Nicola Luigi Bragazzi, Sergio Garbarino
(2024)
Open Access
How rational inference about authority debunking can curtail, sustain or spread belief polarization
Setayesh Radkani, Marika Landau-Wells, Rebecca Saxe
(2024)
Open Access
Division on the Christian right: Republican pastors and the use of force
Stephanie N. Shady, Liesbet Hooghe, Guy B. Marks
Politics and Religion (2024) Vol. 17, Iss. 3, pp. 367-388
Closed Access
Understanding and Combating Misinformation: An Evolutionary Perspective (Preprint)
Nicola Luigi Bragazzi, Sergio Garbarino
JMIR Infodemiology (2024)
Open Access
Motivated reasoning or biased prior impressions: Updating trust towards partisan sources based on evidence
Giannis Lois, Elias Tsakas, Arno Riedl
(2023)
Open Access
Page 1

Scroll to top