Open Access Helper

OpenAlex Citation Counts

OpenAlex Citations Logo

OpenAlex is a bibliographic catalogue of scientific papers, authors and institutions accessible in open access mode, named after the Library of Alexandria. It's citation coverage is excellent and I hope you will find utility in this listing of citing articles!

If you click the article title, you'll navigate to the article, as listed in CrossRef. If you click the Open Access links, you'll navigate to the "best Open Access location". Clicking the citation count will open this listing for that article. Lastly at the bottom of the page, you'll find basic pagination options.

Requested Article:

Prior exposure increases perceived accuracy of fake news.
Gordon Pennycook, Tyrone D. Cannon, David G. Rand
Journal of Experimental Psychology General (2018) Vol. 147, Iss. 12, pp. 1865-1880
Open Access | Times Cited: 971

Showing 1-25 of 971 citing articles:

Lazy, not biased: Susceptibility to partisan fake news is better explained by lack of reasoning than by motivated reasoning
Gordon Pennycook, David G. Rand
Cognition (2018) Vol. 188, pp. 39-50
Closed Access | Times Cited: 1562
Fake news on Twitter during the 2016 U.S. presidential election
Nir Grinberg, Kenneth Joseph, Lisa Friedland, et al.
Science (2019) Vol. 363, Iss. 6425, pp. 374-378
Closed Access | Times Cited: 1545
The future of social media in marketing
Gil Appel, Lauren Grewal, Rhonda Hadi, et al.
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science (2019) Vol. 48, Iss. 1, pp. 79-95
Open Access | Times Cited: 1399
Less than you think: Prevalence and predictors of fake news dissemination on Facebook
Andrew M. Guess, Jonathan Nagler, Joshua A. Tucker
Science Advances (2019) Vol. 5, Iss. 1
Open Access | Times Cited: 1317
Susceptibility to misinformation about COVID-19 around the world
Jon Roozenbeek, Claudia R. Schneider, Sarah Dryhurst, et al.
Royal Society Open Science (2020) Vol. 7, Iss. 10, pp. 201199-201199
Open Access | Times Cited: 1191
The psychological drivers of misinformation belief and its resistance to correction
Ullrich K. H. Ecker, Stephan Lewandowsky, John Cook, et al.
Nature Reviews Psychology (2022) Vol. 1, Iss. 1, pp. 13-29
Open Access | Times Cited: 779
The Psychology of Fake News
Gordon Pennycook, David G. Rand
Trends in Cognitive Sciences (2021) Vol. 25, Iss. 5, pp. 388-402
Open Access | Times Cited: 755
Fighting misinformation on social media using crowdsourced judgments of news source quality
Gordon Pennycook, David G. Rand
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (2019) Vol. 116, Iss. 7, pp. 2521-2526
Open Access | Times Cited: 737
Shifting attention to accuracy can reduce misinformation online
Gordon Pennycook, Ziv Epstein, Mohsen Mosleh, et al.
Nature (2021) Vol. 592, Iss. 7855, pp. 590-595
Open Access | Times Cited: 720
Who falls for fake news? The roles of bullshit receptivity, overclaiming, familiarity, and analytic thinking
Gordon Pennycook, David G. Rand
Journal of Personality (2019) Vol. 88, Iss. 2, pp. 185-200
Open Access | Times Cited: 664
A digital media literacy intervention increases discernment between mainstream and false news in the United States and India
Andrew M. Guess, Michael Lerner, Benjamin Lyons, et al.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (2020) Vol. 117, Iss. 27, pp. 15536-15545
Open Access | Times Cited: 544
Real Solutions for Fake News? Measuring the Effectiveness of General Warnings and Fact-Check Tags in Reducing Belief in False Stories on Social Media
Katherine Clayton, Spencer Blair, Jonathan A. Busam, et al.
Political Behavior (2019) Vol. 42, Iss. 4, pp. 1073-1095
Closed Access | Times Cited: 537
Inoculating Against Fake News About COVID-19
Sander van der Linden, Jon Roozenbeek, Josh Compton
Frontiers in Psychology (2020) Vol. 11
Open Access | Times Cited: 498
Misinformation: susceptibility, spread, and interventions to immunize the public
Sander van der Linden
Nature Medicine (2022) Vol. 28, Iss. 3, pp. 460-467
Open Access | Times Cited: 357
An exploratory study of COVID-19 misinformation on Twitter
Gautam Kishore Shahi, Anne Dirkson, Tim A. Majchrzak
Online Social Networks and Media (2021) Vol. 22, pp. 100104-100104
Open Access | Times Cited: 320
Fake news, social media and marketing: A systematic review
Giandomenico Di Domenico, Jason Sit, Alessio Ishizaka, et al.
Journal of Business Research (2020) Vol. 124, pp. 329-341
Open Access | Times Cited: 308
Reliance on emotion promotes belief in fake news
Cameron Martel, Gordon Pennycook, David G. Rand
Cognitive Research Principles and Implications (2020) Vol. 5, Iss. 1
Open Access | Times Cited: 306
Belief in Fake News is Associated with Delusionality, Dogmatism, Religious Fundamentalism, and Reduced Analytic Thinking
Michael V. Bronstein, Gordon Pennycook, Adam Bear, et al.
Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition (2018) Vol. 8, Iss. 1, pp. 108-117
Open Access | Times Cited: 279
Disinformation as a Threat to Deliberative Democracy
Spencer McKay, Chris Tenove
Political Research Quarterly (2020) Vol. 74, Iss. 3, pp. 703-717
Closed Access | Times Cited: 274
Good News about Bad News: Gamified Inoculation Boosts Confidence and Cognitive Immunity Against Fake News
Melisa Basol, Jon Roozenbeek, Sander van der Linden
Journal of Cognition (2020) Vol. 3, Iss. 1, pp. 2-2
Open Access | Times Cited: 268
The facts of fake news: A research review
Edson C. Tandoc
Sociology Compass (2019) Vol. 13, Iss. 9
Closed Access | Times Cited: 264
Searching for the backfire effect: Measurement and design considerations.
Briony Swire‐Thompson, Joseph DeGutis, David Lazer
Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition (2020) Vol. 9, Iss. 3, pp. 286-299
Open Access | Times Cited: 260
Aging in an Era of Fake News
Nadia M. Brashier, Daniel L. Schacter
Current Directions in Psychological Science (2020) Vol. 29, Iss. 3, pp. 316-323
Open Access | Times Cited: 245
Long-term effectiveness of inoculation against misinformation: Three longitudinal experiments.
Rakoen Maertens, Jon Roozenbeek, Melisa Basol, et al.
Journal of Experimental Psychology Applied (2020) Vol. 27, Iss. 1, pp. 1-16
Open Access | Times Cited: 237
Social Media, Echo Chambers, and Political Polarization
Pablo Barberá
Cambridge University Press eBooks (2020), pp. 34-55
Closed Access | Times Cited: 235
Page 1 - Next Page

Scroll to top