Open Access Helper

OpenAlex Citation Counts

OpenAlex Citations Logo

OpenAlex is a bibliographic catalogue of scientific papers, authors and institutions accessible in open access mode, named after the Library of Alexandria. It's citation coverage is excellent and I hope you will find utility in this listing of citing articles!

If you click the article title, you'll navigate to the article, as listed in CrossRef. If you click the Open Access links, you'll navigate to the "best Open Access location". Clicking the citation count will open this listing for that article. Lastly at the bottom of the page, you'll find basic pagination options.

Requested Article:

Farmers value on-farm ecosystem services as important, but what are the impediments to participation in PES schemes?
G. William Page, Bill Bellotti
The Science of The Total Environment (2015) Vol. 515-516, pp. 12-19
Closed Access | Times Cited: 94

Showing 1-25 of 94 citing articles:

Coupling human and natural systems for sustainability: experience from China's Loess Plateau
Bojie Fu, Xutong Wu, Zhuangzhuang Wang, et al.
Earth System Dynamics (2022) Vol. 13, Iss. 2, pp. 795-808
Open Access | Times Cited: 90
Analysis of the ecological conservation behavior of farmers in payment for ecosystem service programs in eco-environmentally fragile areas using social psychology models
Jian Deng, Pingsheng Sun, Fazhu Zhao, et al.
The Science of The Total Environment (2016) Vol. 550, pp. 382-390
Closed Access | Times Cited: 156
What carbon farming activities are farmers likely to adopt? A best–worst scaling survey
Nikki P. Dumbrell, Marit E. Kragt, Fiona Gibson
Land Use Policy (2016) Vol. 54, pp. 29-37
Open Access | Times Cited: 104
Drivers of farmers' adoption and continuation of climate-smart agricultural practices. A study from northeastern Italy
Francesco Pagliacci, Edi Defrancesco, Daniele Mozzato, et al.
The Science of The Total Environment (2019) Vol. 710, pp. 136345-136345
Open Access | Times Cited: 87
The maturation of ecosystem services: Social and policy research expands, but whither biophysically informed valuation?
Kai M. A. Chan, Terre Satterfield
People and Nature (2020) Vol. 2, Iss. 4, pp. 1021-1060
Open Access | Times Cited: 74
Soil carbon sequestration as a climate strategy: what do farmers think?
Holly Jean Buck, Alexis Palumbo-Compton
Biogeochemistry (2022) Vol. 161, Iss. 1, pp. 59-70
Open Access | Times Cited: 40
Quantifying the extent of ecological impact from China's poverty alleviation relocation program: A case study in Guizhou Province
Qing Feng, Zhongfa Zhou, Quan Chen, et al.
Journal of Cleaner Production (2024) Vol. 444, pp. 141274-141274
Open Access | Times Cited: 8
Motivations and barriers for Western Australian broad-acre farmers to adopt carbon farming
Marit E. Kragt, Nikki P. Dumbrell, Louise Blackmore
Environmental Science & Policy (2017) Vol. 73, pp. 115-123
Open Access | Times Cited: 84
Herder stocking rate and household income under the Grassland Ecological Protection Award Policy in northern China
Yantin Yin, Yulu Hou, Colin Langford, et al.
Land Use Policy (2018) Vol. 82, pp. 120-129
Closed Access | Times Cited: 73
A conceptual model to integrate the regional context in landscape policy, management and contribution to rural development: Literature review and European case study evidence
Ingo Zasada, Kati Häfner, Lena Schaller, et al.
Geoforum (2017) Vol. 82, pp. 1-12
Open Access | Times Cited: 72
The Role of Factors Affecting the Adoption of Environmentally Friendly Farming Practices: Can Geographical Context and Time Explain the Differences Emerging from Literature?
Daniele Mozzato, Paola Gatto, Edi Defrancesco, et al.
Sustainability (2018) Vol. 10, Iss. 9, pp. 3101-3101
Open Access | Times Cited: 71
Impact of illegal mining activities on forest ecosystem services: local communities’ attitudes and willingness to participate in restoration activities in Ghana
Elizabeth Asantewaa Obeng, K.A. Oduro, Beatrice Darko Obiri, et al.
Heliyon (2019) Vol. 5, Iss. 10, pp. e02617-e02617
Open Access | Times Cited: 68
Interregional carbon compensation cost forecast and priority index calculation based on the theoretical carbon deficit: China as a case
Guangchun Yang, Peipei Shang, Lichun He, et al.
The Science of The Total Environment (2018) Vol. 654, pp. 786-800
Closed Access | Times Cited: 61
The role of residents' sustainable intelligence in agricultural heritage site management: Insights from PLS-SEM and Fs/QCA
Jae Ho Lee, Dongoh Joo, Choong‐Ki Lee, et al.
Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management (2022) Vol. 52, pp. 65-74
Closed Access | Times Cited: 29
Prospects for Improving Gravity-Fed Surface Irrigation Systems in Mediterranean European Contexts
Daniele Masseroni, Sandra Ricart, Francisco De Cartagena, et al.
Water (2017) Vol. 9, Iss. 1, pp. 20-20
Open Access | Times Cited: 59
Possibilities and requirements for introducing agri-environment measures in land consolidation projects in China, evidence from ecosystem services and farmers' attitudes
Pengyao Li, Yajuan Chen, Wenhao Hu, et al.
The Science of The Total Environment (2018) Vol. 650, pp. 3145-3155
Closed Access | Times Cited: 51
Additionality is in detail: Farmers' choices regarding payment for ecosystem services programs in the Atlantic forest, Brazil
Gisele Garcia Alarcon, Alfredo Celso Fantini, Carlos Henrique Salvador, et al.
Journal of Rural Studies (2017) Vol. 54, pp. 177-186
Closed Access | Times Cited: 50
Ecosystem services in environmental policy: Barriers and opportunities for increased adoption
Rodney J. Keenan, Greg Pozza, James Fitzsimons
Ecosystem Services (2019) Vol. 38, pp. 100943-100943
Closed Access | Times Cited: 45
Contextualizing context in the analysis of payment for ecosystem services
Karla Juliana Rodríguez-Robayo, Leticia Merino‐Pérez
Ecosystem Services (2017) Vol. 23, pp. 259-267
Closed Access | Times Cited: 41
A proposal for engaging a stakeholder panel in planning post-mining land uses in Australia’s coal-rich tropical savannahs
Jo‐Anne Everingham, John Rolfe, Alex M. Lechner, et al.
Land Use Policy (2018) Vol. 79, pp. 397-406
Closed Access | Times Cited: 39
How agricultural multiple ecosystem services respond to socioeconomic factors in Mengyin County, China
Yajuan Chen, Zhenrong Yu, Xuedong Li, et al.
The Science of The Total Environment (2018) Vol. 630, pp. 1003-1015
Closed Access | Times Cited: 38
Correlating CO2 emissions of cities with the inter-city carbon compensation mechanism: a regional perspective in the middle reaches of the Yangtze River (MRYR), China
Dongliang Li, Linjian Cao, Zhanhang Zhou, et al.
Environment Development and Sustainability (2023) Vol. 26, Iss. 4, pp. 9185-9216
Closed Access | Times Cited: 12
The Environmental and Economic Impacts of Urban Development in Mountainous Areas of Africa – with Special Reference to Ghana
Richard Kwadzo Asare, Gerhardus Petrus Nortjé, Mohammed Takase
F1000Research (2025) Vol. 14, pp. 290-290
Open Access
What factors influence the willingness of protected area communities to relocate? China's ecological relocation policy for Dashanbao Protected Area
Wanting Peng, David López‐Carr, Chengzhao Wu, et al.
The Science of The Total Environment (2020) Vol. 727, pp. 138364-138364
Closed Access | Times Cited: 30
Multilevel analysis of factors affecting participants’ land reconversion willingness after the Grain for Green Program
Xutong Wu, Shuai Wang, Bojie Fu
AMBIO (2021) Vol. 50, Iss. 7, pp. 1394-1403
Open Access | Times Cited: 25
Page 1 - Next Page

Scroll to top