Open Access Helper

OpenAlex Citation Counts

OpenAlex Citations Logo

OpenAlex is a bibliographic catalogue of scientific papers, authors and institutions accessible in open access mode, named after the Library of Alexandria. It's citation coverage is excellent and I hope you will find utility in this listing of citing articles!

If you click the article title, you'll navigate to the article, as listed in CrossRef. If you click the Open Access links, you'll navigate to the "best Open Access location". Clicking the citation count will open this listing for that article. Lastly at the bottom of the page, you'll find basic pagination options.

Requested Article:

Birds of a feather are persuaded together: Perceived source credibility mediates the effect of political bias on misinformation susceptibility
Cecilie S. Traberg, Sander van der Linden
Personality and Individual Differences (2021) Vol. 185, pp. 111269-111269
Closed Access | Times Cited: 83

Showing 1-25 of 83 citing articles:

Misinformation: susceptibility, spread, and interventions to immunize the public
Sander van der Linden
Nature Medicine (2022) Vol. 28, Iss. 3, pp. 460-467
Open Access | Times Cited: 357
Psychological Inoculation against Misinformation: Current Evidence and Future Directions
Cecilie S. Traberg, Jon Roozenbeek, Sander van der Linden
The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science (2022) Vol. 700, Iss. 1, pp. 136-151
Closed Access | Times Cited: 133
Accuracy and social motivations shape judgements of (mis)information
Steve Rathje, Jon Roozenbeek, Jay J. Van Bavel, et al.
Nature Human Behaviour (2023) Vol. 7, Iss. 6, pp. 892-903
Open Access | Times Cited: 70
A meta-analysis of correction effects in science-relevant misinformation
Man‐pui Sally Chan, Dolores Albarracín
Nature Human Behaviour (2023) Vol. 7, Iss. 9, pp. 1514-1525
Closed Access | Times Cited: 43
Technique-based inoculation against real-world misinformation
Jon Roozenbeek, Cecilie S. Traberg, Sander van der Linden
Royal Society Open Science (2022) Vol. 9, Iss. 5
Open Access | Times Cited: 46
Why are people antiscience, and what can we do about it?
Aviva Philipp‐Muller, Spike W. S. Lee, Richard E. Petty
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (2022) Vol. 119, Iss. 30
Open Access | Times Cited: 46
How to Combat Health Misinformation: A Psychological Approach
Jon Roozenbeek, Sander van der Linden
American Journal of Health Promotion (2022) Vol. 36, Iss. 3, pp. 569-575
Open Access | Times Cited: 43
A systematic literature review of the motivations to share fake news on social media platforms and how to fight them
Cristiane Melchior, Mírian Oliveira
New Media & Society (2023) Vol. 26, Iss. 2, pp. 1127-1150
Closed Access | Times Cited: 23
Cognitive Biases in Fact-Checking and Their Countermeasures: A Review
Michael Soprano, Kevin Roitero, David La Barbera, et al.
Information Processing & Management (2024) Vol. 61, Iss. 3, pp. 103672-103672
Open Access | Times Cited: 12
The persuasive effects of social cues and source effects on misinformation susceptibility
Cecilie S. Traberg, Trisha Harjani, Jon Roozenbeek, et al.
Scientific Reports (2024) Vol. 14, Iss. 1
Open Access | Times Cited: 11
Managing Infodemics in the 21st Century
Tina D. Purnat, Tim Nguyen, Sylvie Briand
Springer eBooks (2023)
Closed Access | Times Cited: 21
Face/Off: Changing the face of movies with deepfakes
Gillian Murphy, Didier Ching, John G. Twomey, et al.
PLoS ONE (2023) Vol. 18, Iss. 7, pp. e0287503-e0287503
Open Access | Times Cited: 21
Health misinformation: what it is, why people believe it, how to counter it
Xiaoli Nan, Kathryn Thier, Yuan Wang
Annals of the International Communication Association (2023) Vol. 47, Iss. 4, pp. 381-410
Closed Access | Times Cited: 16
“It's Not Literally True, But You Get the Gist:” How nuanced understandings of truth encourage people to condone and spread misinformation
Julia A. Langdon, Beth Anne Helgason, Judy Qiu, et al.
Current Opinion in Psychology (2024) Vol. 57, pp. 101788-101788
Open Access | Times Cited: 4
Community notes increase trust in fact-checking on social media
Chiara Patricia Drolsbach, Kirill Solovev, Nicolas Pröllochs
PNAS Nexus (2024) Vol. 3, Iss. 7
Open Access | Times Cited: 4
Susceptibility to online misinformation: A systematic meta-analysis of demographic and psychological factors
Mubashir Sultan, Alan Novaes Tump, Nina Ehmann, et al.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (2024) Vol. 121, Iss. 47
Open Access | Times Cited: 4
The “digital personalization effect” (DPE): A quantification of the possible extent to which personalizing content can increase the impact of online manipulations
Robert Epstein, Amanda Newland, Li Tang
Computers in Human Behavior (2025), pp. 108578-108578
Open Access
Deepfake Label Recall: Combating Disinformation with Labels is Especially Effective for Those Who Dislike the Speaker
William I. MacKenzie, Ryan Weber, Hannah M. Barr, et al.
International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction (2025), pp. 1-15
Closed Access
How do people evaluate the accuracy of video posts when a warning indicates they were generated by AI?
Yuya Shibuya, Tomoka Nakazato, Soichiro Takagi
International Journal of Human-Computer Studies (2025), pp. 103485-103485
Open Access
‘Presidential’ is in the ear of the beholder
Aimee Pavia Meader, Matthew Wood Hayes
Journal of Language and Politics (2025)
Closed Access
Belief polarization can be caused by disagreements over source independence: Computational modelling, experimental evidence, and applicability to real-world politics
David J. Young, Jens Koed Madsen, Lee de‐Wit
Cognition (2025) Vol. 259, pp. 106126-106126
Open Access
Mechanisms in continued influence: The impact of misinformation corrections on source perceptions
Victoria Westbrook, Duane T. Wegener, Mark W. Susmann
Memory & Cognition (2023) Vol. 51, Iss. 6, pp. 1317-1330
Closed Access | Times Cited: 12
The effect of traffic light veracity labels on perceptions of political advertising source and message credibility on social media
Tom Dobber, Sanne Kruikemeier, Fabio Votta, et al.
Journal of Information Technology & Politics (2023), pp. 1-16
Open Access | Times Cited: 10
Using Psychological Science To Understand And Fight Health Misinformation: An APA Consensus Statement
Sander van der Linden, Dolores Albarracín, Lisa K. Fazio, et al.
PsycEXTRA Dataset (2023)
Open Access | Times Cited: 10
Countering misinformation through psychological inoculation
Sander van der Linden
Advances in experimental social psychology (2023), pp. 1-58
Closed Access | Times Cited: 9
Page 1 - Next Page

Scroll to top