Open Access Helper

OpenAlex Citation Counts

OpenAlex Citations Logo

OpenAlex is a bibliographic catalogue of scientific papers, authors and institutions accessible in open access mode, named after the Library of Alexandria. It's citation coverage is excellent and I hope you will find utility in this listing of citing articles!

If you click the article title, you'll navigate to the article, as listed in CrossRef. If you click the Open Access links, you'll navigate to the "best Open Access location". Clicking the citation count will open this listing for that article. Lastly at the bottom of the page, you'll find basic pagination options.

Requested Article:

Data and code availability statements in systematic reviews of interventions were often missing or inaccurate: a content analysis
Matthew J. Page, Phi‐Yen Nguyen, Daniel G. Hamilton, et al.
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology (2022) Vol. 147, pp. 1-10
Open Access | Times Cited: 37

Showing 1-25 of 37 citing articles:

Prevalence and predictors of data and code sharing in the medical and health sciences: systematic review with meta-analysis of individual participant data
Daniel G. Hamilton, Kyungwan Hong, Hannah Fraser, et al.
BMJ (2023), pp. e075767-e075767
Open Access | Times Cited: 46
Bioactive Compounds and Their Derivatives: An Insight into Prospective Phytotherapeutic Approach against Alzheimer’s Disease
Fahadul Islam, Jannatul Fardous Khadija, Md. Harun-Or-Rashid, et al.
Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity (2022) Vol. 2022, pp. 1-22
Open Access | Times Cited: 58
Changing patterns in reporting and sharing of review data in systematic reviews with meta-analysis of the effects of interventions: cross sectional meta-research study
Phi‐Yen Nguyen, Raju Kanukula, Joanne E. McKenzie, et al.
BMJ (2022), pp. e072428-e072428
Open Access | Times Cited: 38
An analysis of reporting practices in the top 100 cited health and medicine-related bibliometric studies from 2019 to 2021 based on a proposed guidelines
Malcolm Koo, Shih-Chun Lin
Heliyon (2023) Vol. 9, Iss. 6, pp. e16780-e16780
Open Access | Times Cited: 25
Systematic review search strategies are poorly reported and not reproducible: a cross-sectional metaresearch study
Melissa L. Rethlefsen, Tara Brigham, Carrie Price, et al.
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology (2023) Vol. 166, pp. 111229-111229
Open Access | Times Cited: 19
Critical appraisal of methodological quality and completeness of reporting in Chinese social science systematic reviews with meta‐analysis: A systematic review
Liping Guo, Sarah Miller, Wenjie Zhou, et al.
Campbell Systematic Reviews (2025) Vol. 21, Iss. 1
Open Access
Formalistic data and code availability policy in high-profile medical journals and pervasive policy-practice gaps in published articles: A meta-research study
Wei Li, Xuerong Liu, Qianyu Zhang, et al.
Accountability in Research (2025), pp. 1-25
Closed Access
Dental Research Data Availability and Quality According to the FAIR Principles
Sergio Uribe, Ahmad Sofi‐Mahmudi, Eero Raittio, et al.
Journal of Dental Research (2022) Vol. 101, Iss. 11, pp. 1307-1313
Open Access | Times Cited: 19
How often do cancer researchers make their data and code available and what factors are associated with sharing?
Daniel G. Hamilton, Matthew J. Page, Sue Finch, et al.
BMC Medicine (2022) Vol. 20, Iss. 1
Open Access | Times Cited: 18
Open science practices need substantial improvement in prognostic model studies in oncology using machine learning
Gary S. Collins, Rebecca Whittle, Garrett S. Bullock, et al.
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology (2023) Vol. 165, pp. 111199-111199
Open Access | Times Cited: 10
Cancer researchers’ experiences with and perceptions of research data sharing: Results of a cross-sectional survey
Daniel G. Hamilton, Matthew J. Page, Sarah Everitt, et al.
Accountability in Research (2024), pp. 1-28
Open Access | Times Cited: 3
Data sharing practices across knowledge domains: A dynamic examination of data availability statements in PLOS ONE publications
Chenyue Jiao, Kai Li, Zhichao Fang
Journal of Information Science (2022) Vol. 50, Iss. 3, pp. 673-689
Open Access | Times Cited: 12
Systematic reviewers' perspectives on sharing review data, analytic code, and other materials: A survey
Phi‐Yen Nguyen, Joanne E. McKenzie, Daniel G. Hamilton, et al.
Cochrane Evidence Synthesis and Methods (2023) Vol. 1, Iss. 2
Open Access | Times Cited: 5
The transparency and reproducibility of systematic reviews in forensic science
Jason Chin, Bethany Growns, Joel Sebastian, et al.
Forensic Science International (2022) Vol. 340, pp. 111472-111472
Open Access | Times Cited: 9
Rates and predictors of data and code sharing in the medical and health sciences: A systematic review with meta-analysis of individual participant data
Daniel G. Hamilton, Kyungwan Hong, Hannah Fraser, et al.
medRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (2023)
Open Access | Times Cited: 5
The reporting completeness and transparency of systematic reviews of prognostic prediction models for COVID-19 was poor: a methodological overview of systematic reviews
Persefoni Talimtzi, Antonios Ntolkeras, Georgios Kostopoulos, et al.
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology (2024) Vol. 167, pp. 111264-111264
Closed Access | Times Cited: 1
Research Transparency in 59 Fields of Medical and Health Sciences: A Meta-Research Study
Ahmad Sofi‐Mahmudi, Eero Raittio, Sergio Uribe, et al.
medRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (2024)
Open Access | Times Cited: 1
Defining mental health literacy: a systematic literature review and educational inspiration
Shengnan Zeng, Richard Bailey, Shuo Peng, et al.
Journal of Public Mental Health (2024) Vol. 23, Iss. 3, pp. 189-204
Closed Access | Times Cited: 1
Systematic review search strategies are poorly described and not reproducible: a cross-sectional meta-research study
Melissa L. Rethlefsen, Tara Brigham, Carrie Price, et al.
medRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (2023)
Open Access | Times Cited: 3
Reporting quality and risk of bias of systematic reviews of ultra-processed foods: a methodological study
Ziyi Wang, Yan Wang, Wenru Shang, et al.
European Journal of Clinical Nutrition (2023) Vol. 78, Iss. 3, pp. 171-179
Closed Access | Times Cited: 3
Can a replication revolution resolve the duplication crisis in systematic reviews?
Sathya Karunananthan, Jeremy Grimshaw, Lara Maxwell, et al.
BMJ evidence-based medicine (2023) Vol. 29, Iss. 5, pp. 285-288
Closed Access | Times Cited: 2
Reproducibility of Published Meta-Analyses on Clinical-Psychological Interventions
Rubén López‐Nicolás, Daniël Lakens, José A López-López, et al.
Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science (2024) Vol. 7, Iss. 1
Open Access
Raw data were not disclosed in 95% of PubMed-indexed heart failure meta-analyses in 2021: A systematic analysis of transparency
Panagiotis Karakitsos, Konstantinos S. Mylonas
International Journal of Cardiology (2024) Vol. 405, pp. 131987-131987
Closed Access
Research Transparency in 59 Disciplines of Clinical Medicine: A Meta-Research Study
Ahmad Sofi‐Mahmudi, Eero Raittio, Sergio Uribe, et al.
(2024)
Open Access
Understanding the challenges associated with finding and accessing restricted data in Canada: a mixed methods study
Kevin Read, Grant Gibson, Amber Leahey, et al.
FACETS (2024) Vol. 9, pp. 1-9
Open Access
Page 1 - Next Page

Scroll to top