Open Access Helper

OpenAlex Citation Counts

OpenAlex Citations Logo

OpenAlex is a bibliographic catalogue of scientific papers, authors and institutions accessible in open access mode, named after the Library of Alexandria. It's citation coverage is excellent and I hope you will find utility in this listing of citing articles!

If you click the article title, you'll navigate to the article, as listed in CrossRef. If you click the Open Access links, you'll navigate to the "best Open Access location". Clicking the citation count will open this listing for that article. Lastly at the bottom of the page, you'll find basic pagination options.

Requested Article:

Differences in views of experts about their role in particulate matter policy advice: Empirical evidence from an international expert consultation
Pita Spruijt, Anne Knol, Arthur C. Petersen, et al.
Environmental Science & Policy (2016) Vol. 59, pp. 44-52
Open Access | Times Cited: 40

Showing 1-25 of 40 citing articles:

Policy documents as sources for measuring societal impact: how often is climate change research mentioned in policy-related documents?
Lutz Bornmann, Robin Haunschild, Werner Marx
Scientometrics (2016) Vol. 109, Iss. 3, pp. 1477-1495
Open Access | Times Cited: 102
Using Q-methodology in environmental sustainability research: A bibliometric analysis and systematic review
Gretchen Sneegas, Sydney Beckner, Christian Brannstrom, et al.
Ecological Economics (2020) Vol. 180, pp. 106864-106864
Open Access | Times Cited: 101
Policy-makers perspectives on credibility, relevance and legitimacy (CRELE)
G. Dunn, Matthew Laing
Environmental Science & Policy (2017) Vol. 76, pp. 146-152
Closed Access | Times Cited: 96
Do stakeholders’ perspectives on renewable energy infrastructure pose a risk to energy policy implementation? A case of a hydropower plant in Switzerland
Paula Díaz, Carolina Adler, Anthony Patt
Energy Policy (2017) Vol. 108, pp. 21-28
Open Access | Times Cited: 63
Science for change: A survey on the normative and political dimensions of global sustainability research
Sandra van der Hel
Global Environmental Change (2018) Vol. 52, pp. 248-258
Open Access | Times Cited: 56
Why Do Countries Regulate Environmental Health Risks Differently? A Theoretical Perspective
Sander Clahsen, Irene van Kamp, Betty C. Hakkert, et al.
Risk Analysis (2018) Vol. 39, Iss. 2, pp. 439-461
Open Access | Times Cited: 43
An application of Q-methodology to Mediterranean olive production – stakeholders' understanding of sustainability issues
Nathalıe Iofrıda, Anna Irene De Luca, Gıovannı Gulısano, et al.
Agricultural Systems (2018) Vol. 162, pp. 46-55
Closed Access | Times Cited: 36
The use and potential of Q method in environmental planning and management
Lucas Seghezzo, Gretchen Sneegas, Wendy Jepson, et al.
Journal of Environmental Planning and Management (2023), pp. 1-27
Closed Access | Times Cited: 9
Researchers’ approaches to stakeholders: Interaction or transfer of knowledge?
Åsa Knaggård, Daniel Slunge, Anders Ekbom, et al.
Environmental Science & Policy (2019) Vol. 97, pp. 25-35
Open Access | Times Cited: 29
Scientists’ attitudes on science and values: Case studies and survey methods in philosophy of science
Daniel Steel, Chad Gonnerman, Michael O’Rourke
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A (2017) Vol. 63, pp. 22-30
Closed Access | Times Cited: 26
Conceptualizing the Science-Practice Interface: Lessons from a Collaborative Network on the Front-Line of Climate Change
Nathan P. Kettle, Sarah F. Trainor, Philip A. Loring
Frontiers in Environmental Science (2017) Vol. 5
Open Access | Times Cited: 26
Policy advice in technology assessment: Shifting roles, principles and boundaries
Anja Bauer, Karen Kastenhofer
Technological Forecasting and Social Change (2018) Vol. 139, pp. 32-41
Closed Access | Times Cited: 24
Energy poverty in the Czech Republic: Individual responsibility or structural issue?
Hedvika Koďousková, Lukáš Lehotský
Energy Research & Social Science (2020) Vol. 72, pp. 101877-101877
Closed Access | Times Cited: 22
From Arctic Science to International Law: The Road towards the Minamata Convention and the Role of the Arctic Council
Froukje Maria Platjouw, Eirik Hovland Steindal, Trude Borch
Arctic review on law and politics (2018) Vol. 9, pp. 226-243
Open Access | Times Cited: 17
Vertane Chancen? Die aktuelle politische Debatte um Erweiterte DNA‐Analysen in Ermittlungsverfahren*
Veronika Lipphardt
Berichte zur Wissenschaftsgeschichte (2018) Vol. 41, Iss. 3, pp. 279-301
Open Access | Times Cited: 17
Organizational roles and network effects on ideational influence in science-policy interface: Climate policy networks in Germany and Japan
Keiichi Satoh, Melanie Nagel, Volker Schneider
Social Networks (2022) Vol. 75, pp. 88-106
Open Access | Times Cited: 9
From pure science to participatory knowledge production? Researchers’ perceptions on science–policy interface in bioenergy policy
Sanna‐Riikka Saarela
Science and Public Policy (2018) Vol. 46, Iss. 1, pp. 81-90
Closed Access | Times Cited: 16
“Let me tell you your problems”. Using Q methodology to elicit latent problem perceptions about invasive alien species
Jetske Vaas, Peter Driessen, Mendel Giezen, et al.
Geoforum (2018) Vol. 99, pp. 120-131
Open Access | Times Cited: 15
Using Q methodology to investigate the views of local experts on the sustainability of community-based forestry in Oddar Meanchey province, Cambodia
Sareth Nhem, Young Jin Lee
Forest Policy and Economics (2019) Vol. 106, pp. 101961-101961
Closed Access | Times Cited: 14
SSH researchers make an impact differently. Looking at public research from the perspective of users
Andrea Bonaccorsi, Filippo Chiarello, Gualtiero Fantoni
Research Evaluation (2021) Vol. 30, Iss. 3, pp. 269-289
Closed Access | Times Cited: 10
Understanding conflicting views of endocrine disruptor experts: a pilot study using argumentation analysis
Sander Clahsen, Holly S. van Klaveren, Theo Vermeire, et al.
Journal of Risk Research (2019) Vol. 23, Iss. 1, pp. 62-80
Open Access | Times Cited: 9
What a Decade (2006–15) Of Journal Abstracts Can Tell Us about Trends in Ocean and Coastal Sustainability Challenges and Solutions
Murray A. Rudd
Frontiers in Marine Science (2017) Vol. 4
Open Access | Times Cited: 8
New Science Institutions for Global Sustainability
Sandra van der Hel
(2020)
Open Access | Times Cited: 6
Aggregating local, regional and global burden of disease impact assessment: detecting potential problem shifting in air quality policy making
Yumi Kobayashi, Gregory Peters, Nicholas J. Ashbolt, et al.
The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment (2017) Vol. 22, Iss. 10, pp. 1543-1557
Closed Access | Times Cited: 5
Expert Views on Their Role as Policy Advisor: Pilot Study for the Cases of Electromagnetic Fields, Particulate Matter, and Antimicrobial Resistance
Pita Spruijt, Anne Knol, Arthur C. Petersen, et al.
Risk Analysis (2018) Vol. 39, Iss. 5, pp. 968-974
Open Access | Times Cited: 4
Page 1 - Next Page

Scroll to top