OpenAlex Citation Counts

OpenAlex Citations Logo

OpenAlex is a bibliographic catalogue of scientific papers, authors and institutions accessible in open access mode, named after the Library of Alexandria. It's citation coverage is excellent and I hope you will find utility in this listing of citing articles!

If you click the article title, you'll navigate to the article, as listed in CrossRef. If you click the Open Access links, you'll navigate to the "best Open Access location". Clicking the citation count will open this listing for that article. Lastly at the bottom of the page, you'll find basic pagination options.

Requested Article:

Types of collective action problems and farmers’ willingness to accept agri-environmental schemes in Switzerland
Sergio Villamayor‐Tomás, Julian Sagebiel, Jens Rommel, et al.
Ecosystem Services (2021) Vol. 50, pp. 101304-101304
Open Access | Times Cited: 35

Showing 1-25 of 35 citing articles:

Participation in individual and collective agri-environmental schemes: A synthesis using the Theory of Planned Behaviour
Adelaide Sander, Jaboury Ghazoul, Robert Finger, et al.
Journal of Rural Studies (2024) Vol. 107, pp. 103255-103255
Open Access | Times Cited: 8

Factors influencing the use of treated wastewater for irrigation in the agricultural sector: evidence from Iran
Moslem Savari, Mohammad Shokati Amghani, Arash Malekian
Cleaner Engineering and Technology (2025), pp. 100901-100901
Open Access | Times Cited: 1

Factors influencing farmers' intention to participate in the voluntary carbon market: An extended theory of planned behavior
Mariarita Cammarata, Alessandro Scuderi, Giuseppe Timpanaro, et al.
Journal of Environmental Management (2024) Vol. 369, pp. 122367-122367
Open Access | Times Cited: 6

Insights into innovative contract design to improve the integration of biodiversity and ecosystem services in agricultural management
Birte Bredemeier, Sylvia Herrmann, Claudia Sattler, et al.
Ecosystem Services (2022) Vol. 55, pp. 101430-101430
Open Access | Times Cited: 25

Farmers’ Willingness to Participate in a Carbon Sequestration Program – A Discrete Choice Experiment
Julia B. Block, Michael Danne, Oliver Mußhoff
Environmental Management (2024) Vol. 74, Iss. 2, pp. 332-349
Open Access | Times Cited: 5

How to reduce the carbon footprint of the agricultural sector? Factors influencing farmers’ decision to participate in carbon sequestration programs
Julia B. Block, Marius Michels, Oliver Mußhoff, et al.
Journal of Environmental Management (2024) Vol. 359, pp. 121019-121019
Open Access | Times Cited: 5

Action- or results-based payments for ecosystem services in the era of smart weeding robots?
Anna Massfeller, Marie L. Zingsheim, Alireza Ahmadi, et al.
Biological Conservation (2025) Vol. 302, pp. 110998-110998
Open Access

Fighting the pollinators decline in practice – Farmers’ willingness to accept an eco-scheme for their conservation in Aragon, Spain
Enrique Muñoz-Ulecia, Pilar Uldemolins, A. Bernués, et al.
Resources Environment and Sustainability (2025) Vol. 20, pp. 100208-100208
Open Access

Agricultural soils in climate change mitigation: comparing action-based and results-based programmes for carbon sequestration
Julia B. Block, Daniel Hermann, Oliver Mußhoff
Climatic Change (2024) Vol. 177, Iss. 8
Open Access | Times Cited: 4

Social capital and behavioral response to water scarcity: Sustainable agriculture policies pathways for adopting dry direct-seeded rice
Moslem Savari, Mohammadamin Ghezi, Homa Molavi
Agricultural Water Management (2025) Vol. 313, pp. 109478-109478
Open Access

Understanding farmers’ decision-making on agri-environmental schemes: A case study from Saxony, Germany
Felix Wittstock, Anne Paulus, Michael Beckmann, et al.
Land Use Policy (2022) Vol. 122, pp. 106371-106371
Open Access | Times Cited: 16

A window into land managers’ preferences for new forms of agri-environmental schemes: Evidence from a post-Brexit analysis
Emmanouil Tyllianakis, Julia Martin‐Ortega, Guy Ziv, et al.
Land Use Policy (2023) Vol. 129, pp. 106627-106627
Open Access | Times Cited: 10

Exploring farmers’ perspectives on collective action: a case study on co-operation in Dutch agri-environment schemes
Margarethe Reichenspurner, Rena Barghusen, Bettina Matzdorf
Journal of Environmental Planning and Management (2023) Vol. 67, Iss. 8, pp. 1830-1851
Open Access | Times Cited: 10

Considering Farmers’ Heterogeneity to Payment Ecosystem Services Participation: A Choice Experiment and Agent-Based Model Analysis in Xin’an River Basin, China
Shengnan Li, Baohang Hui, Cai Jin, et al.
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (2022) Vol. 19, Iss. 12, pp. 7190-7190
Open Access | Times Cited: 9

Learning about German farmers’ willingness to cooperate from public goods games and expert predictions
Jens Rommel, Christoph Schulze, Bettina Matzdorf, et al.
Q Open (2022) Vol. 3, Iss. 3
Open Access | Times Cited: 9

Heterogeneity Impacts of Farmers’ Participation in Payment for Ecosystem Services Based on the Collective Action Framework
Yunyun Qi, Tianye Zhang, Jing Cao, et al.
Land (2022) Vol. 11, Iss. 11, pp. 2007-2007
Open Access | Times Cited: 9

Evaluating incentives to encourage native afforestation on private lands in Aotearoa–New Zealand
Maksym Polyakov, Peter Edwards, Geoff Kaine, et al.
Landscape and Urban Planning (2023) Vol. 244, pp. 104979-104979
Closed Access | Times Cited: 5

A theory-driven framework for the design and implementation of successful agri-environmental programmes: results of a realist review
Bibi Witvliet, Huub Ploegmakers, Sander Meijerink
International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability (2024) Vol. 22, Iss. 1
Open Access | Times Cited: 1

Field observation and verbal exchange as different peer effects in farmers’ technology adoption decisions
Anna Massfeller, Hugo Storm
Agricultural Economics (2024) Vol. 55, Iss. 5, pp. 739-757
Open Access | Times Cited: 1

The effects of dynamic incentives on the recycling of livestock and poultry manure in a multiscenario evolutionary game
Liangcheng Xiong, Xiaoyan Li, Jiajun Ning, et al.
Environment Development and Sustainability (2022) Vol. 25, Iss. 5, pp. 4301-4333
Closed Access | Times Cited: 5

Factors Influencing the Perceived Economic Benefits of Innovative Agri-Environmental Contracts
Tracy Bradfield, Kina S. Harmanny, Thia Hennessy, et al.
Environmental Management (2024) Vol. 74, Iss. 4, pp. 790-807
Open Access

Ecosystem services and collective action: New commons, new governance challenges
Cécile Barnaud, Roldán Muradian
Ecosystem Services (2024) Vol. 70, pp. 101662-101662
Closed Access

Farmers’ limited perceptions of the role of ecological processes in crop production, a potential obstacle to agroecological transition
Yves Cartailler, Elsa Berthet, Simon Durand, et al.
Journal of Rural Studies (2024) Vol. 111, pp. 103438-103438
Closed Access

Page 1 - Next Page

Scroll to top