OpenAlex Citation Counts

OpenAlex Citations Logo

OpenAlex is a bibliographic catalogue of scientific papers, authors and institutions accessible in open access mode, named after the Library of Alexandria. It's citation coverage is excellent and I hope you will find utility in this listing of citing articles!

If you click the article title, you'll navigate to the article, as listed in CrossRef. If you click the Open Access links, you'll navigate to the "best Open Access location". Clicking the citation count will open this listing for that article. Lastly at the bottom of the page, you'll find basic pagination options.

Requested Article:

Showing 1-25 of 65 citing articles:

Reasoning supports utilitarian resolutions to moral dilemmas across diverse measures.
Indrajeet Patil, Micaela Maria Zucchelli, Wouter Kool, et al.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (2020) Vol. 120, Iss. 2, pp. 443-460
Closed Access | Times Cited: 103

Using the CNI Model to Investigate Individual Differences in Moral Dilemma Judgments
Anita Körner, Roland Deutsch, Bertram Gawronski
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin (2020) Vol. 46, Iss. 9, pp. 1392-1407
Open Access | Times Cited: 81

Cognitive reflection, cognitive intelligence, and cognitive abilities: A meta-analysis
Inmaculada Otero, Jesús F. Salgado, Silvia Moscoso
Intelligence (2021) Vol. 90, pp. 101614-101614
Open Access | Times Cited: 66

A framework for understanding reasoning errors: From fake news to climate change and beyond
Gordon Pennycook
Advances in experimental social psychology (2022), pp. 131-208
Open Access | Times Cited: 40

Moral Judgment as Categorization (MJAC)
Cillian McHugh, Marek McGann, Eric R. Igou, et al.
Perspectives on Psychological Science (2021) Vol. 17, Iss. 1, pp. 131-152
Open Access | Times Cited: 45

Compassionate Conservation Clashes With Conservation Biology: Should Empathy, Compassion, and Deontological Moral Principles Drive Conservation Practice?
Andrea S. Griffin, Alex Callen, Kaya Klop‐Toker, et al.
Frontiers in Psychology (2020) Vol. 11
Open Access | Times Cited: 42

Analytic atheism and analytic apostasy across cultures
Nick Byrd, Stephen Stich, Justin Sytsma
Religious Studies (2025), pp. 1-25
Closed Access

Sex Differences in Cognitive Reflection: A Meta-Analysis
Inmaculada Otero, Alexandra Martínez, Dámaris Cuadrado, et al.
Journal of Intelligence (2024) Vol. 12, Iss. 4, pp. 39-39
Open Access | Times Cited: 4

The psychology of philosophy: Associating philosophical views with psychological traits in professional philosophers
David B. Yaden, Derek Egan Anderson
Philosophical Psychology (2021) Vol. 34, Iss. 5, pp. 721-755
Open Access | Times Cited: 23

How cognitive and emotional empathy relate to rational thinking: empirical evidence and meta-analysis
Alison Jane Martingano, Sara Konrath
The Journal of Social Psychology (2022) Vol. 162, Iss. 1, pp. 143-160
Closed Access | Times Cited: 18

Framing self-sacrifice in the investigation of moral judgment and moral emotions in human and autonomous driving dilemmas
Giovanni Bruno, Andrea Spoto, Lorella Lotto, et al.
Motivation and Emotion (2023) Vol. 47, Iss. 5, pp. 781-794
Open Access | Times Cited: 9

Many heads are more utilitarian than one
Anita Keshmirian, Ophélia Deroy, Bahador Bahrami
Cognition (2021) Vol. 220, pp. 104965-104965
Open Access | Times Cited: 18

Deontological and Utilitarian Responses to Sacrificial Dilemmas Predict Disapproval of Sin Stocks
Paweł Niszczota, Michał Białek, Paul Conway
Social Psychology (2022) Vol. 53, Iss. 2, pp. 51-62
Open Access | Times Cited: 13

Analytic Atheism & Analytic Apostasy Across Cultures
Nick Byrd, Stephen Stich, Justin Sytsma
(2024)
Open Access | Times Cited: 2

(How) Do You Regret Killing One to Save Five? Affective and Cognitive Regret Differ After Utilitarian and Deontological Decisions
Jacob Goldstein-Greenwood, Paul Conway, Amy Summerville, et al.
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin (2020) Vol. 46, Iss. 9, pp. 1303-1317
Closed Access | Times Cited: 18

Reasoning supports utilitarian resolutions to moral dilemmas across diverse measures
Indrajeet Patil, Micaela Maria Zucchelli, Wouter Kool, et al.
(2018)
Open Access | Times Cited: 19

Hunger Bias or Gut Instinct? Responses to Judgments of Harm Depending on Visceral State Versus Intuitive Decision-Making
Helen Brown, Michael J. Proulx, Danaë Stanton Fraser
Frontiers in Psychology (2020) Vol. 11
Open Access | Times Cited: 12

Moral decision making is robust to physical fatigue: a Process Dissociation analysis
Michał Stefańczyk, Grzegorz Żurek, Artur Macyszyn, et al.
(2024)
Open Access | Times Cited: 1

Social class and moral judgment: a process dissociation perspective
Andreas Tutić, Friederike Haiser, Ivar Krumpal
Frontiers in Sociology (2024) Vol. 9
Open Access | Times Cited: 1

Why People With High Alexithymia Make More Utilitarian Judgments
Xiangyi Zhang, Zhihui Wu, Shenglan Li, et al.
Experimental Psychology (formerly Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie) (2020) Vol. 67, Iss. 1, pp. 23-30
Closed Access | Times Cited: 11

Effects of Instrumentality and Personal Force on Deontological and Utilitarian Inclinations in Harm-Related Moral Dilemmas
Jonas Ludwig, Rainer Reisenzein, Anette Hiemisch
Frontiers in Psychology (2020) Vol. 11
Open Access | Times Cited: 9

Insecure and insensitive: Avoidant and anxious attachment predict less concern for others in sacrificial moral dilemmas
Heather M. Maranges, Susan K. Chen, Paul Conway
Personality and Individual Differences (2021) Vol. 185, pp. 111274-111274
Closed Access | Times Cited: 9

Page 1 - Next Page

Scroll to top