Open Access Helper

OpenAlex Citation Counts

OpenAlex Citations Logo

OpenAlex is a bibliographic catalogue of scientific papers, authors and institutions accessible in open access mode, named after the Library of Alexandria. It's citation coverage is excellent and I hope you will find utility in this listing of citing articles!

If you click the article title, you'll navigate to the article, as listed in CrossRef. If you click the Open Access links, you'll navigate to the "best Open Access location". Clicking the citation count will open this listing for that article. Lastly at the bottom of the page, you'll find basic pagination options.

Requested Article:

Analytic thinking reduces belief in conspiracy theories
Viren Swami, Martin Voracek, Stefan Stieger, et al.
Cognition (2014) Vol. 133, Iss. 3, pp. 572-585
Open Access | Times Cited: 639

Showing 1-25 of 639 citing articles:

Lazy, not biased: Susceptibility to partisan fake news is better explained by lack of reasoning than by motivated reasoning
Gordon Pennycook, David G. Rand
Cognition (2018) Vol. 188, pp. 39-50
Closed Access | Times Cited: 1564
Fighting COVID-19 Misinformation on Social Media: Experimental Evidence for a Scalable Accuracy-Nudge Intervention
Gordon Pennycook, Jonathon McPhetres, Yunhao Zhang, et al.
Psychological Science (2020) Vol. 31, Iss. 7, pp. 770-780
Open Access | Times Cited: 1362
Susceptibility to misinformation about COVID-19 around the world
Jon Roozenbeek, Claudia R. Schneider, Sarah Dryhurst, et al.
Royal Society Open Science (2020) Vol. 7, Iss. 10, pp. 201199-201199
Open Access | Times Cited: 1203
Understanding Conspiracy Theories
Karen M. Douglas, Joseph E. Uscinski, Robbie M. Sutton, et al.
Political Psychology (2019) Vol. 40, Iss. S1, pp. 3-35
Open Access | Times Cited: 1175
The Psychology of Conspiracy Theories
Karen M. Douglas, Robbie M. Sutton, Aleksandra Cichocka
Current Directions in Psychological Science (2017) Vol. 26, Iss. 6, pp. 538-542
Open Access | Times Cited: 1014
The Psychology of Fake News
Gordon Pennycook, David G. Rand
Trends in Cognitive Sciences (2021) Vol. 25, Iss. 5, pp. 388-402
Open Access | Times Cited: 764
Who falls for fake news? The roles of bullshit receptivity, overclaiming, familiarity, and analytic thinking
Gordon Pennycook, David G. Rand
Journal of Personality (2019) Vol. 88, Iss. 2, pp. 185-200
Open Access | Times Cited: 669
On the reception and detection of pseudo-profound bullshit
Gordon Pennycook, James Allan Cheyne, Nathaniel Barr, et al.
Judgment and Decision Making (2015) Vol. 10, Iss. 6, pp. 549-563
Open Access | Times Cited: 468
Fake news, fast and slow: Deliberation reduces belief in false (but not true) news headlines.
Bence Bagó, David G. Rand, Gordon Pennycook
Journal of Experimental Psychology General (2020) Vol. 149, Iss. 8, pp. 1608-1613
Open Access | Times Cited: 421
Coronavirus conspiracy beliefs, mistrust, and compliance with government guidelines in England
Daniel Freeman, Felicity Waite, Laina Rosebrock, et al.
Psychological Medicine (2020) Vol. 52, Iss. 2, pp. 251-263
Open Access | Times Cited: 421
Why Education Predicts Decreased Belief in Conspiracy Theories
Jan‐Willem van Prooijen
Applied Cognitive Psychology (2016) Vol. 31, Iss. 1, pp. 50-58
Open Access | Times Cited: 415
Fighting COVID-19 misinformation on social media: Experimental evidence for a scalable accuracy nudge intervention
Gordon Pennycook, Jonathon McPhetres, Yunhao Zhang, et al.
(2020)
Open Access | Times Cited: 398
Belief in conspiracy theories: Basic principles of an emerging research domain
Jan‐Willem van Prooijen, Karen M. Douglas
European Journal of Social Psychology (2018) Vol. 48, Iss. 7, pp. 897-908
Open Access | Times Cited: 387
Misinformation: susceptibility, spread, and interventions to immunize the public
Sander van der Linden
Nature Medicine (2022) Vol. 28, Iss. 3, pp. 460-467
Open Access | Times Cited: 361
Someone is pulling the strings: hypersensitive agency detection and belief in conspiracy theories
Karen M. Douglas, Robbie M. Sutton, Mitchell J. Callan, et al.
Thinking & Reasoning (2015) Vol. 22, Iss. 1, pp. 57-77
Open Access | Times Cited: 347
Conspiracy Theories: Evolved Functions and Psychological Mechanisms
Jan‐Willem van Prooijen, Mark van Vugt
Perspectives on Psychological Science (2018) Vol. 13, Iss. 6, pp. 770-788
Open Access | Times Cited: 324
Everyday Consequences of Analytic Thinking
Gordon Pennycook, Jonathan A. Fugelsang, Derek J. Koehler
Current Directions in Psychological Science (2015) Vol. 24, Iss. 6, pp. 425-432
Open Access | Times Cited: 323
Reliance on emotion promotes belief in fake news
Cameron Martel, Gordon Pennycook, David G. Rand
Cognitive Research Principles and Implications (2020) Vol. 5, Iss. 1
Open Access | Times Cited: 306
Connecting the dots: Illusory pattern perception predicts belief in conspiracies and the supernatural
Jan‐Willem van Prooijen, Karen M. Douglas, Clara De Inocencio
European Journal of Social Psychology (2017) Vol. 48, Iss. 3, pp. 320-335
Open Access | Times Cited: 291
Belief in Fake News is Associated with Delusionality, Dogmatism, Religious Fundamentalism, and Reduced Analytic Thinking
Michael V. Bronstein, Gordon Pennycook, Adam Bear, et al.
Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition (2018) Vol. 8, Iss. 1, pp. 108-117
Open Access | Times Cited: 279
COVID-19-related conspiracy beliefs and their relationship with perceived stress and pre-existing conspiracy beliefs
Neophytos Georgiou, Paul Delfabbro, Ryan Balzan
Personality and Individual Differences (2020) Vol. 166, pp. 110201-110201
Open Access | Times Cited: 273
Antecedents and consequences of COVID-19 conspiracy beliefs: A systematic review
Valerie van Mulukom, Lotte Pummerer, Sinan Alper, et al.
Social Science & Medicine (2022) Vol. 301, pp. 114912-114912
Open Access | Times Cited: 267
Addicted to answers: Need for cognitive closure and the endorsement of conspiracy beliefs
Marta Marchlewska, Aleksandra Cichocka, Małgorzata Kossowska
European Journal of Social Psychology (2017) Vol. 48, Iss. 2, pp. 109-117
Open Access | Times Cited: 266
A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Psychological Research on Conspiracy Beliefs: Field Characteristics, Measurement Instruments, and Associations With Personality Traits
Andreas Goreis, Martin Voracek
Frontiers in Psychology (2019) Vol. 10
Open Access | Times Cited: 261
The Paranoid Style in American Politics Revisited: An Ideological Asymmetry in Conspiratorial Thinking
Sander van der Linden, Costas Panagopoulos, Flávio Azevedo, et al.
Political Psychology (2020) Vol. 42, Iss. 1, pp. 23-51
Open Access | Times Cited: 253
Page 1 - Next Page

Scroll to top