Open Access Helper

OpenAlex Citation Counts

OpenAlex Citations Logo

OpenAlex is a bibliographic catalogue of scientific papers, authors and institutions accessible in open access mode, named after the Library of Alexandria. It's citation coverage is excellent and I hope you will find utility in this listing of citing articles!

If you click the article title, you'll navigate to the article, as listed in CrossRef. If you click the Open Access links, you'll navigate to the "best Open Access location". Clicking the citation count will open this listing for that article. Lastly at the bottom of the page, you'll find basic pagination options.

Requested Article:

Transcranial electrical stimulation motor threshold can estimate individualized tDCS dosage from reverse-calculation electric-field modeling
Kevin A. Caulfield, Bashar W. Badran, William H. DeVries, et al.
Brain stimulation (2020) Vol. 13, Iss. 4, pp. 961-969
Open Access | Times Cited: 71

Showing 1-25 of 71 citing articles:

Neurocognitive, physiological, and biophysical effects of transcranial alternating current stimulation
Miles Wischnewski, Ivan Alekseichuk, Alexander Opitz
Trends in Cognitive Sciences (2022) Vol. 27, Iss. 2, pp. 189-205
Open Access | Times Cited: 102
Neuronavigation maximizes accuracy and precision in TMS positioning: Evidence from 11,230 distance, angle, and electric field modeling measurements
Kevin A. Caulfield, Holly H Fleischmann, Claire Cox, et al.
Brain stimulation (2022) Vol. 15, Iss. 5, pp. 1192-1205
Open Access | Times Cited: 65
Identifying regions in prefrontal cortex related to working memory improvement: A novel meta-analytic method using electric field modeling
Miles Wischnewski, Kathleen Mantell, Alexander Opitz
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews (2021) Vol. 130, pp. 147-161
Open Access | Times Cited: 62
Electric field simulation and appropriate electrode positioning for optimized transcranial direct current stimulation of stroke patients: an in Silico model
Mi‐Jeong Yoon, Hye Jung Park, Yeun Jie Yoo, et al.
Scientific Reports (2024) Vol. 14, Iss. 1
Open Access | Times Cited: 8
Mind-wandering: mechanistic insights from lesion, tDCS, and iEEG
Julia W. Y. Kam, Matthias Mittner, Robert T. Knight
Trends in Cognitive Sciences (2022) Vol. 26, Iss. 3, pp. 268-282
Open Access | Times Cited: 32
Inter-individual variability in current direction for common tDCS montages
Carys Evans, Catharina Zich, Jenny S. A. Lee, et al.
NeuroImage (2022) Vol. 260, pp. 119501-119501
Open Access | Times Cited: 31
Recent advancements in optimising transcranial electrical stimulation: reducing response variability through individualised stimulation
Kym Wansbrough, Jane Tan, Ann‐Maree Vallence, et al.
Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences (2024) Vol. 56, pp. 101360-101360
Open Access | Times Cited: 6
Exciting the social butterfly: Anodal cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation modulates neural activation during predictive social mentalizing
Naem Haihambo, Meijia Li, Qianying Ma, et al.
International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology (2024) Vol. 24, Iss. 3, pp. 100480-100480
Open Access | Times Cited: 6
Differences in electric field strength between clinical and non-clinical populations induced by prefrontal tDCS: A cross-diagnostic, individual MRI-based modeling study
Yuki Mizutani-Tiebel, Shun Takahashi, Temmuz Karali, et al.
NeuroImage Clinical (2022) Vol. 34, pp. 103011-103011
Open Access | Times Cited: 25
Optimized APPS-tDCS electrode position, size, and distance doubles the on-target stimulation magnitude in 3000 electric field models
Kevin A. Caulfield, Mark S. George
Scientific Reports (2022) Vol. 12, Iss. 1
Open Access | Times Cited: 25
Reducing scalp pain for pTES of motor cortex using background hums
Mats Forssell, Rabira Tusi, Jeehyun Kim, et al.
(2025)
Closed Access
Electric Field Strength From Prefrontal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Determines Degree of Working Memory Response: A Potential Application of Reverse-Calculation Modeling?
Kevin A. Caulfield, Aprinda Indahlastari, Nicole R. Nissim, et al.
Neuromodulation Technology at the Neural Interface (2020) Vol. 25, Iss. 4, pp. 578-587
Open Access | Times Cited: 36
A reexamination of motor and prefrontal TMS in tobacco use disorder: Time for personalized dosing based on electric field modeling?
Kevin A. Caulfield, Xingbao Li, Mark S. George
Clinical Neurophysiology (2021) Vol. 132, Iss. 9, pp. 2199-2207
Open Access | Times Cited: 30
Electric Fields Induced in the Brain by Transcranial Electric Stimulation: A Review of In Vivo Recordings
Matteo Guidetti, Mattia Arlotti, Tommaso Bocci, et al.
Biomedicines (2022) Vol. 10, Iss. 10, pp. 2333-2333
Open Access | Times Cited: 22
Outcome measures for electric field modeling in tES and TMS: A systematic review and large-scale modeling study
Sybren Van Hoornweder, Marten Nuyts, Joana Frieske, et al.
NeuroImage (2023) Vol. 281, pp. 120379-120379
Open Access | Times Cited: 12
Can transcranial electrical stimulation motor threshold estimate individualized tDCS doses over the prefrontal cortex? Evidence from reverse-calculation electric field modeling
Kevin A. Caulfield, Bashar W. Badran, Xingbao Li, et al.
Brain stimulation (2020) Vol. 13, Iss. 4, pp. 1150-1152
Open Access | Times Cited: 28
Group and individual level variations between symmetric and asymmetric DLPFC montages for tDCS over large scale brain network nodes
Ghazaleh Soleimani, Mehrdad Saviz, Marom Bikson, et al.
Scientific Reports (2021) Vol. 11, Iss. 1
Open Access | Times Cited: 26
Four electric field modeling methods of Dosing Prefrontal Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS): Introducing APEX MT dosimetry
Kevin A. Caulfield, Xingbao Li, Mark S. George
Brain stimulation (2021) Vol. 14, Iss. 4, pp. 1032-1034
Open Access | Times Cited: 26
Estimation of individually induced e-field strength during transcranial electric stimulation using the head circumference
Daria Antonenko, Ulrike Grittner, Oula Puonti, et al.
Brain stimulation (2021) Vol. 14, Iss. 5, pp. 1055-1058
Open Access | Times Cited: 23
Review of individualized current flow modeling studies for transcranial electrical stimulation
Alexander Hunold, Jens Haueisen, Frauke Nees, et al.
Journal of Neuroscience Research (2022) Vol. 101, Iss. 4, pp. 405-423
Open Access | Times Cited: 18
tDCS induced GABA change is associated with the simulated electric field in M1, an effect mediated by grey matter volume in the MRS voxel
Tulika Nandi, Oula Puonti, William T. Clarke, et al.
Brain stimulation (2022) Vol. 15, Iss. 5, pp. 1153-1162
Open Access | Times Cited: 17
Addressing transcranial electrical stimulation variability through prospective individualized dosing of electric field strength in 300 participants across two samples: the 2-SPED approach
Sybren Van Hoornweder, Kevin A. Caulfield, Michael A. Nitsche, et al.
Journal of Neural Engineering (2022) Vol. 19, Iss. 5, pp. 056045-056045
Open Access | Times Cited: 17
A Systematic Review and Large-Scale tES and TMS Electric Field Modeling Study Reveals How Outcome Measure Selection Alters Results in a Person- and Montage-Specific Manner
Sybren Van Hoornweder, Marten Nuyts, Joana Frieske, et al.
bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (2023)
Open Access | Times Cited: 9
Multi-objective optimization via evolutionary algorithm (MOVEA) for high-definition transcranial electrical stimulation of the human brain
Mo Wang, Kexin Lou, Zeming Liu, et al.
NeuroImage (2023) Vol. 280, pp. 120331-120331
Open Access | Times Cited: 9
Transcranial Electrical Stimulation for Associative Memory Enhancement: State-of-the-Art from Basic to Clinical Research
Jovana Bjekić, Milica Manojlović, Saša R. Filipović
Life (2023) Vol. 13, Iss. 5, pp. 1125-1125
Open Access | Times Cited: 7
Page 1 - Next Page

Scroll to top