Open Access Helper

OpenAlex Citation Counts

OpenAlex Citations Logo

OpenAlex is a bibliographic catalogue of scientific papers, authors and institutions accessible in open access mode, named after the Library of Alexandria. It's citation coverage is excellent and I hope you will find utility in this listing of citing articles!

If you click the article title, you'll navigate to the article, as listed in CrossRef. If you click the Open Access links, you'll navigate to the "best Open Access location". Clicking the citation count will open this listing for that article. Lastly at the bottom of the page, you'll find basic pagination options.

Requested Article:

Showing 1-25 of 82 citing articles:

Tweeting From Left to Right
Pablo Barberá, John T. Jost, Jonathan Nagler, et al.
Psychological Science (2015) Vol. 26, Iss. 10, pp. 1531-1542
Closed Access | Times Cited: 1230
Ideological Asymmetries and the Essence of Political Psychology
John T. Jost
Political Psychology (2017) Vol. 38, Iss. 2, pp. 167-208
Closed Access | Times Cited: 614
Processing political misinformation: comprehending the Trump phenomenon
Briony Swire, Adam J. Berinsky, Stephan Lewandowsky, et al.
Royal Society Open Science (2017) Vol. 4, Iss. 3, pp. 160802-160802
Open Access | Times Cited: 456
Missing in (Collective) Action
John T. Jost, Julia C. Becker, Danny Osborne, et al.
Current Directions in Psychological Science (2017) Vol. 26, Iss. 2, pp. 99-108
Open Access | Times Cited: 251
Ideological asymmetries in conformity, desire for shared reality, and the spread of misinformation
John T. Jost, Sander van der Linden, Costas Panagopoulos, et al.
Current Opinion in Psychology (2018) Vol. 23, pp. 77-83
Closed Access | Times Cited: 223
The activist’s dilemma: Extreme protest actions reduce popular support for social movements.
Matthew Feinberg, Robb Willer, Chloe Kovacheff
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (2020) Vol. 119, Iss. 5, pp. 1086-1111
Closed Access | Times Cited: 143
Understanding and combatting misinformation across 16 countries on six continents
Antonio A. Arechar, Jennifer Allen, Adam J. Berinsky, et al.
Nature Human Behaviour (2023) Vol. 7, Iss. 9, pp. 1502-1513
Closed Access | Times Cited: 100
The marketplace of ideology: “Elective affinities” in political psychology and their implications for consumer behavior
John T. Jost
Journal of Consumer Psychology (2017) Vol. 27, Iss. 4, pp. 502-520
Open Access | Times Cited: 117
Social and economic ideologies differentially predict prejudice across the political spectrum, but social issues are most divisive.
Jarret T. Crawford, Mark J. Brandt, Yoel Inbar, et al.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (2017) Vol. 112, Iss. 3, pp. 383-412
Open Access | Times Cited: 104
Perceived Social Consensus Can Reduce Ideological Biases on Climate Change
Matthew H. Goldberg, Sander van der Linden, Anthony Leiserowitz, et al.
Environment and Behavior (2019) Vol. 52, Iss. 5, pp. 495-517
Open Access | Times Cited: 100
Past-focused temporal communication overcomes conservatives’ resistance to liberal political ideas.
Joris Lammers, Matthew Baldwin
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (2018) Vol. 114, Iss. 4, pp. 599-619
Closed Access | Times Cited: 95
Beliefs about Childhood Vaccination in the United States: Political Ideology, False Consensus, and the Illusion of Uniqueness
Mitchell Rabinowitz, Lauren Latella, Chadly Stern, et al.
PLoS ONE (2016) Vol. 11, Iss. 7, pp. e0158382-e0158382
Open Access | Times Cited: 91
Are neoliberals more susceptible to bullshit?
Joanna Sterling, John T. Jost, Gordon Pennycook
Judgment and Decision Making (2016) Vol. 11, Iss. 4, pp. 352-360
Open Access | Times Cited: 90
Polarization Over Vaccination: Ideological Differences in Twitter Expression About COVID-19 Vaccine Favorability and Specific Hesitancy Concerns
Xiaoya Jiang, Min-Hsin Su, Juwon Hwang, et al.
Social Media + Society (2021) Vol. 7, Iss. 3
Open Access | Times Cited: 71
Resistance to Change: A Social Psychological Perspective
John T. Jost
Deleted Journal (2015) Vol. 82, Iss. 3, pp. 607-636
Closed Access | Times Cited: 84
System justification: Experimental evidence, its contextual nature, and implications for social change
Justin Friesen, Kristin Laurin, Steven Shepherd, et al.
British Journal of Social Psychology (2018) Vol. 58, Iss. 2, pp. 315-339
Closed Access | Times Cited: 81
Moralized Rationality: Relying on Logic and Evidence in the Formation and Evaluation of Belief Can Be Seen as a Moral Issue
Tomas Ståhl, Maarten P. Zaal, Linda J. Skitka
PLoS ONE (2016) Vol. 11, Iss. 11, pp. e0166332-e0166332
Open Access | Times Cited: 73
On the Grammar of Politics—or Why Conservatives Prefer Nouns
Aleksandra Cichocka, Michał Bilewicz, John T. Jost, et al.
Political Psychology (2016) Vol. 37, Iss. 6, pp. 799-815
Open Access | Times Cited: 70
When in Danger, Turn Right: Does Covid-19 Threat Promote Social Conservatism and Right-Wing Presidential Candidates?
Maciej Karwowski, Marta Kowal, Agata Groyecka-Bernard, et al.
Human Ethology (2020) Vol. 35, Iss. 1, pp. 37-48
Open Access | Times Cited: 63
Tell it like it is: When politically incorrect language promotes authenticity.
Michael Rosenblum, Juliana Schroeder, Francesca Gino
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (2019) Vol. 119, Iss. 1, pp. 75-103
Open Access | Times Cited: 56
Information Processing
Jennifer Jerit, Cindy D. Kam
Oxford University Press eBooks (2023), pp. 517-554
Closed Access | Times Cited: 18
The Complex Relation Between Receptivity to Pseudo-Profound Bullshit and Political Ideology
Artur Nilsson, Arvid Erlandsson, Daniel Västfjäll
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin (2019) Vol. 45, Iss. 10, pp. 1440-1454
Closed Access | Times Cited: 54
The potential role of actively open-minded thinking in preventing motivated reasoning about controversial science
Neil Stenhouse, Teresa Myers, Emily K. Vraga, et al.
Journal of Environmental Psychology (2018) Vol. 57, pp. 17-24
Closed Access | Times Cited: 48
Moral “foundations” as the product of motivated social cognition: Empathy and other psychological underpinnings of ideological divergence in “individualizing” and “binding” concerns
Michael Strupp-Levitsky, Sharareh Noorbaloochi, Andrew Shipley, et al.
PLoS ONE (2020) Vol. 15, Iss. 11, pp. e0241144-e0241144
Open Access | Times Cited: 47
Who Believes in Conspiracy Theories? Network Diversity, Political Discussion, and Conservative Conspiracy Theories on Social Media
Seong Jae Min
American Politics Research (2021) Vol. 49, Iss. 5, pp. 415-427
Closed Access | Times Cited: 40
Page 1 - Next Page

Scroll to top