Open Access Helper

OpenAlex Citation Counts

OpenAlex Citations Logo

OpenAlex is a bibliographic catalogue of scientific papers, authors and institutions accessible in open access mode, named after the Library of Alexandria. It's citation coverage is excellent and I hope you will find utility in this listing of citing articles!

If you click the article title, you'll navigate to the article, as listed in CrossRef. If you click the Open Access links, you'll navigate to the "best Open Access location". Clicking the citation count will open this listing for that article. Lastly at the bottom of the page, you'll find basic pagination options.

Requested Article:

Impact factor: outdated artefact or stepping-stone to journal certification?
Jerome K. Vanclay
Scientometrics (2011) Vol. 92, Iss. 2, pp. 211-238
Open Access | Times Cited: 367

Showing 1-25 of 367 citing articles:

A review of the literature on citation impact indicators
Ludo Waltman
Journal of Informetrics (2016) Vol. 10, Iss. 2, pp. 365-391
Open Access | Times Cited: 1056
A review of theory and practice in scientometrics
John Mingers, Loet Leydesdorff
European Journal of Operational Research (2015) Vol. 246, Iss. 1, pp. 1-19
Open Access | Times Cited: 828
Bibliometrics: tracking research impact by selecting the appropriate metrics
Ashok Agarwal, Damayanthi Durairajanayagam, Sindhuja Tatagari, et al.
Asian Journal of Andrology (2015) Vol. 18, Iss. 2, pp. 296-296
Open Access | Times Cited: 499
Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank
Björn Brembs, Katherine S. Button, Marcus R. Munafò
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience (2013) Vol. 7
Open Access | Times Cited: 424
The N-Pact Factor: Evaluating the Quality of Empirical Journals with Respect to Sample Size and Statistical Power
R. Chris Fraley, Simine Vazire
PLoS ONE (2014) Vol. 9, Iss. 10, pp. e109019-e109019
Open Access | Times Cited: 407
Early coauthorship with top scientists predicts success in academic careers
Weihua Li, Tomaso Aste, Fabio Caccioli, et al.
Nature Communications (2019) Vol. 10, Iss. 1
Open Access | Times Cited: 213
Descriptions of Sampling Practices Within Five Approaches to Qualitative Research in Education and the Health Sciences
Timothy C. Guetterman
Forum qualitative Sozialforschung (2015) Vol. 16, Iss. 2, pp. 23
Closed Access | Times Cited: 203
Prestigious Science Journals Struggle to Reach Even Average Reliability
Björn Brembs
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience (2018) Vol. 12
Open Access | Times Cited: 181
How significant are the public dimensions of faculty work in review, promotion and tenure documents?
Juan Pablo Alperín, Carol Muñoz Nieves, Lesley A. Schimanski, et al.
eLife (2019) Vol. 8
Open Access | Times Cited: 148
The replication crisis has led to positive structural, procedural, and community changes
Max Korbmacher, Flávio Azevedo, Charlotte R. Pennington, et al.
Communications Psychology (2023) Vol. 1, Iss. 1
Open Access | Times Cited: 47
The Academic Manifesto: From an Occupied to a Public University
Willem Halffman, Hans Radder
Minerva (2015) Vol. 53, Iss. 2, pp. 165-187
Open Access | Times Cited: 140
Factors affecting citation rates in environmental science
Jerome K. Vanclay
Journal of Informetrics (2013) Vol. 7, Iss. 2, pp. 265-271
Closed Access | Times Cited: 127
Editors’ JIF-boosting stratagems – Which are appropriate and which not?
Ben R. Martin
Research Policy (2015) Vol. 45, Iss. 1, pp. 1-7
Open Access | Times Cited: 118
What do the scientists think about the impact factor?
Gualberto Buela‐Casal, Izabela Zych
Scientometrics (2012) Vol. 92, Iss. 2, pp. 281-292
Closed Access | Times Cited: 112
San Francisco declaration on research assessment

Science Editor and Publisher (2020) Vol. 5, Iss. 1, pp. 51-53
Open Access | Times Cited: 88
Bibliometrics and systematic reviews: A comparison between the Proknow-C and the Methodi Ordinatio
Gustavo Dambiski Gomes de Carvalho, Carla Cristiane Sokulski, Wesley Vieira da Silva, et al.
Journal of Informetrics (2020) Vol. 14, Iss. 3, pp. 101043-101043
Closed Access | Times Cited: 77
Replication in field ecology: Identifying challenges and proposing solutions
Alessandro Filazzola, James F. Cahill
Methods in Ecology and Evolution (2021) Vol. 12, Iss. 10, pp. 1780-1792
Open Access | Times Cited: 64
Inequities of race, place, and gender among the communication citation elite, 2000–2019
Deen Freelon, Meredith L. Pruden, Kirsten A. Eddy, et al.
Journal of Communication (2023) Vol. 73, Iss. 4, pp. 356-367
Closed Access | Times Cited: 24
A new Normalized Index for Ranking Papers in Systematic Literature Reviews
Vilmar Steffen, Maiquiel Schmidt de Oliveira, Claiton Zanini Brusamarello, et al.
Decision Analytics Journal (2024) Vol. 10, pp. 100439-100439
Open Access | Times Cited: 9
Reported methodological quality of medical systematic reviews: Development of an assessment tool (ReMarQ) and meta-research study
Manuel Marques‐Cruz, Rafael José Vieira, Daniel Martinho-Dias, et al.
Research Synthesis Methods (2025), pp. 1-19
Closed Access | Times Cited: 1
A Large-Scale Analysis of Impact Factor Biased Journal Self-Citations
Caspar Chorus, Ludo Waltman
PLoS ONE (2016) Vol. 11, Iss. 8, pp. e0161021-e0161021
Open Access | Times Cited: 84
Alternatives to the journal impact factor: I3 and the top-10% (or top-25%?) of the most-highly cited papers
Loet Leydesdorff
Scientometrics (2012) Vol. 92, Iss. 2, pp. 355-365
Open Access | Times Cited: 81
Impact factors, scientometrics and the history of citation-based research
Derek Smith
Scientometrics (2012) Vol. 92, Iss. 2, pp. 419-427
Closed Access | Times Cited: 78
Science deserves to be judged by its contents, not by its wrapping: Revisiting Seglen's work on journal impact and research evaluation
Lin Zhang, Ronald Rousseau, Gunnar Sivertsen
PLoS ONE (2017) Vol. 12, Iss. 3, pp. e0174205-e0174205
Open Access | Times Cited: 71
Evaluating scientific research in Italy: The 2004–10 research evaluation exercise
Alessio Ancaiani, Alberto Anfossi, Barbara Anna, et al.
Research Evaluation (2015) Vol. 24, Iss. 3, pp. 242-255
Closed Access | Times Cited: 68
Page 1 - Next Page

Scroll to top