Open Access Helper

OpenAlex Citation Counts

OpenAlex Citations Logo

OpenAlex is a bibliographic catalogue of scientific papers, authors and institutions accessible in open access mode, named after the Library of Alexandria. It's citation coverage is excellent and I hope you will find utility in this listing of citing articles!

If you click the article title, you'll navigate to the article, as listed in CrossRef. If you click the Open Access links, you'll navigate to the "best Open Access location". Clicking the citation count will open this listing for that article. Lastly at the bottom of the page, you'll find basic pagination options.

Requested Article:

Partisan Dehumanization in American Politics
Erin Cassese
Political Behavior (2019) Vol. 43, Iss. 1, pp. 29-50
Closed Access | Times Cited: 123

Showing 1-25 of 123 citing articles:

This One’s for the Boys: How Gendered Political Socialization Limits Girls’ Political Ambition and Interest
Angela L. Bos, Jill S. Greenlee, Mirya R. Holman, et al.
American Political Science Review (2021) Vol. 116, Iss. 2, pp. 484-501
Open Access | Times Cited: 128
Dehumanization: trends, insights, and challenges
Nour Kteily, Alexander Landry
Trends in Cognitive Sciences (2022) Vol. 26, Iss. 3, pp. 222-240
Closed Access | Times Cited: 120
Interventions reducing affective polarization do not necessarily improve anti-democratic attitudes
Jan G. Voelkel, James C.H. Chu, Michael N. Stagnaro, et al.
Nature Human Behaviour (2022) Vol. 7, Iss. 1, pp. 55-64
Open Access | Times Cited: 105
Interventions to reduce partisan animosity
Rachel Hartman, Will Blakey, Jake Womick, et al.
Nature Human Behaviour (2022) Vol. 6, Iss. 9, pp. 1194-1205
Closed Access | Times Cited: 101
Why voters who value democracy participate in democratic backsliding
Alia Braley, Gabriel Lenz, Dhaval Adjodah, et al.
Nature Human Behaviour (2023) Vol. 7, Iss. 8, pp. 1282-1293
Open Access | Times Cited: 43
Couples Therapy for a Divided America: Assessing the Effects of Reciprocal Group Reflection on Partisan Polarization
Hannah Baron, Robert Blair, Donghyun Danny Choi, et al.
Political Behavior (2025)
Closed Access | Times Cited: 1
Party Animals? Extreme Partisan Polarization and Dehumanization
James Martherus, Andres G. Martinez, Paul K. Piff, et al.
Political Behavior (2019) Vol. 43, Iss. 2, pp. 517-540
Closed Access | Times Cited: 141
Ideology, Not Affect: What Americans Want from Political Representation
Mia Costa
American Journal of Political Science (2020) Vol. 65, Iss. 2, pp. 342-358
Closed Access | Times Cited: 95
The Normalization of Hatred: Identity, Affective Polarization, and Dehumanization on Facebook in the Context of Intractable Political Conflict
Tal Orian Harel, Jessica Katz Jameson, Ifat Maoz
Social Media + Society (2020) Vol. 6, Iss. 2
Open Access | Times Cited: 88
The prime psychological suspects of toxic political polarization
Samantha L. Moore‐Berg, Boaz Hameiri, Emile Bruneau
Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences (2020) Vol. 34, pp. 199-204
Closed Access | Times Cited: 71
Emotion and Politics: Noncognitive Psychological Biases in Public Opinion
Steven W. Webster, Bethany Albertson
Annual Review of Political Science (2022) Vol. 25, Iss. 1, pp. 401-418
Open Access | Times Cited: 52
Nasty Politics
Thomas Zeitzoff
Oxford University Press eBooks (2023)
Closed Access | Times Cited: 22
Reducing Explicit Blatant Dehumanization by Correcting Exaggerated Meta-Perceptions
Alexander Landry, Jonathan W. Schooler, Robb Willer, et al.
Social Psychological and Personality Science (2022) Vol. 14, Iss. 4, pp. 407-418
Open Access | Times Cited: 34
The Social Consequences of Political Anger
Steven W. Webster, Elizabeth C. Connors, Betsy Sinclair
The Journal of Politics (2022) Vol. 84, Iss. 3, pp. 1292-1305
Closed Access | Times Cited: 28
Need for Chaos and Dehumanization are Robustly Associated with Support for Partisan Violence, While Political Measures are Not
Alexander Landry, James Druckman, Robb Willer
Political Behavior (2024) Vol. 46, Iss. 4, pp. 2631-2655
Closed Access | Times Cited: 6
Affective Polarization in Political and Nonpolitical Settings
Thomas Rudolph, Marc J. Hetherington
International Journal of Public Opinion Research (2020) Vol. 33, Iss. 3, pp. 591-606
Closed Access | Times Cited: 44
Negative partisanship is not more prevalent than positive partisanship
Amber Hye‐Yon Lee, Yphtach Lelkes, Carlee Beth Hawkins, et al.
Nature Human Behaviour (2022) Vol. 6, Iss. 7, pp. 951-963
Open Access | Times Cited: 26
The Subversion Dilemma: Why Voters Who Cherish Democracy Participate in Democratic Backsliding
Alia Braley, Gabriel Lenz, Dhaval Adjodah, et al.
Research Square (Research Square) (2022)
Open Access | Times Cited: 24
A matter of right or wrong: Divisive attributes of moralized science and technology attitudes
Robin Bayes
Public Understanding of Science (2025)
Closed Access
Why can't we be friends? Untangling conjoined polarization in America
Julie Norman, Beniamino Green
Political Psychology (2025)
Open Access
The cost of dehumanization: How political rhetoric shapes public resistance to cooperation with adversaries
Faten Ghosn, A. Burcu Bayram
Cooperation and Conflict (2025)
Closed Access
The Politics of Ethics: Can Honesty Cross Over Political Polarization?
Sang Yeal Lee, Samar Ben Romdhane
Journalism and Media (2025) Vol. 6, Iss. 1, pp. 23-23
Open Access
Gendered Jobs and Local Leaders
Rachel Bernhard, Mirya R. Holman
(2025)
Open Access
Othering in politics: how affective polarization undermines democratic philia?
Emre Erdoğan, Pınar Uyan-Semerci
Frontiers in Political Science (2025) Vol. 7
Open Access
Interventions Reducing Affective Polarization Do Not Necessarily Improve Anti-Democratic Attitudes
Jan G. Voelkel, James Chu, Michael N. Stagnaro, et al.
(2021)
Closed Access | Times Cited: 24
Page 1 - Next Page

Scroll to top