Open Access Helper

OpenAlex Citation Counts

OpenAlex Citations Logo

OpenAlex is a bibliographic catalogue of scientific papers, authors and institutions accessible in open access mode, named after the Library of Alexandria. It's citation coverage is excellent and I hope you will find utility in this listing of citing articles!

If you click the article title, you'll navigate to the article, as listed in CrossRef. If you click the Open Access links, you'll navigate to the "best Open Access location". Clicking the citation count will open this listing for that article. Lastly at the bottom of the page, you'll find basic pagination options.

Requested Article:

Five-year clinical performance of a HEMA-free one-step self-etch adhesive in noncarious cervical lesions
Kirsten Van Landuyt, Jan De Munck, R. Banu Ermiş, et al.
Clinical Oral Investigations (2013)
Closed Access | Times Cited: 45

Showing 1-25 of 45 citing articles:

From Buonocore's Pioneering Acid-Etch Technique to Self-Adhering Restoratives. A Status Perspective of Rapidly Advancing Dental Adhesive Technology.
Bart Van Meerbeek, Kumiko Yoshihara, Kirsten Van Landuyt, et al.
(2020) Vol. 22, Iss. 1, pp. 7-34
Closed Access | Times Cited: 305
Randomized 3-year clinical evaluation of Class I and II posterior resin restorations placed with a bulk-fill resin composite and a one-step self-etching adhesive.
Jan W.V. van Dijken, Ulla Pallesen
Journal of adhesive dentistry/˜The œjournal of adhesive dentistry (2015) Vol. 17, Iss. 1, pp. 81-8
Closed Access | Times Cited: 91
HEMA-free versus HEMA-containing adhesive systems: a systematic review
Esraa Abdelkhalek, Hamdi H. Hamama, Salah H. Mahmoud
Systematic Reviews (2025) Vol. 14, Iss. 1
Open Access
Influence of adhesive strategy on clinical parameters in cervical restorations: A systematic review and meta-analysis
M. Schroeder, Ivo Carlos Corrêa, José Bauer, et al.
Journal of Dentistry (2017) Vol. 62, pp. 36-53
Closed Access | Times Cited: 53
Do Universal Adhesives Benefit from an Extra Bonding Layer
Mohammed H. Ahmed, Jan De Munck, Kirsten Van Landuyt, et al.
(2019) Vol. 21, Iss. 2, pp. 117-132
Closed Access | Times Cited: 52
Clinical and OCT outcomes of a universal adhesive in a randomized clinical trial after 12 months
Rainer Haak, Marcus Hähnel, Hartmut Schneider, et al.
Journal of Dentistry (2019) Vol. 90, pp. 103200-103200
Open Access | Times Cited: 44
Degradation of adhesive-dentin interfaces created using different bonding strategies after five-year simulated pulpal pressure
Victor Pinheiro Feitosa, Salvatore Sauro, Walter Zenobi, et al.
Journal of adhesive dentistry/˜The œjournal of adhesive dentistry (2019) Vol. 21, Iss. 3, pp. 199-207
Closed Access | Times Cited: 41
Two‐year performance of CAD/CAM fabricated resin composite inlay restorations: A randomized controlled clinical trial
Ayşe Tuğçe Tunaç, Esra Uzer Çelik, Bilal Yaşa
Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry (2019) Vol. 31, Iss. 6, pp. 627-638
Closed Access | Times Cited: 35
Three-year clinical performance of a HEMA-free one-step self-etch adhesive in non-carious cervical lesions
Kirsten Van Landuyt, Marleen Peumans, Jan De Munck, et al.
European Journal Of Oral Sciences (2011) Vol. 119, Iss. 6, pp. 511-516
Closed Access | Times Cited: 47
Clinical evaluation of different adhesives used in the restoration of non‐carious cervical lesions: 24‐month results
D Tuncer, AR Yazici, Gül Özgünaltay, et al.
Australian Dental Journal (2013) Vol. 58, Iss. 1, pp. 94-100
Open Access | Times Cited: 39
A three-year clinical evaluation of a one-step self-etch and a two-step etch-and-rinse adhesive in non-carious cervical lesions
Matthias Häfer, Holger Jentsch, Rainer Haak, et al.
Journal of Dentistry (2014) Vol. 43, Iss. 3, pp. 350-361
Closed Access | Times Cited: 36
Abfraction: Etiopathogenesis, clinical aspect, and diagnostic-treatment modalities: A review
Shahnawaz Khijmatgar, Anand Badavannavar, Sneha Ajari, et al.
Indian Journal of Dental Research (2020) Vol. 31, Iss. 2, pp. 305-305
Open Access | Times Cited: 30
Randomized clinical trial of four adhesion strategies in cervical lesions: 12-month results.
Eloisa A.ndrade de Paula, Lidia Yileng Tay, Carlos Kose, et al.
PubMed (2015) Vol. 10, Iss. 1, pp. 122-145
Closed Access | Times Cited: 28
Compliance of Randomized Clinical Trials in Noncarious Cervical Lesions With the CONSORT Statement: A Systematic Review of Methodology
Alessandra Reis, JL de Geus, Letícia Maíra Wambier, et al.
Operative Dentistry (2018) Vol. 43, Iss. 3, pp. E129-E151
Closed Access | Times Cited: 27
Adhesive strategies in cervical lesions: systematic review and a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Fabiana Dias Simas Dreweck, Adrieli Burey, Marcelo de Oliveira Dreweck, et al.
Clinical Oral Investigations (2021) Vol. 25, Iss. 5, pp. 2495-2510
Closed Access | Times Cited: 20
Three-year clinical evaluation of a two-step self-etch adhesive with or without selective enamel etching in non-carious cervical sclerotic lesions
Esra Can Say, Emre Özel, Haktan Yurdagüven, et al.
Clinical Oral Investigations (2013) Vol. 18, Iss. 5, pp. 1427-1433
Closed Access | Times Cited: 30
Six-year clinical performance of etch-and-rinse and self-etch adhesives
Lee W. Boushell, Harald O. Heymann, André V. Ritter, et al.
Dental Materials (2016) Vol. 32, Iss. 9, pp. 1065-1072
Closed Access | Times Cited: 25
A randomized five-year clinical study of a two-step self-etch adhesive with or without selective enamel etching
Esra Can Say, Haktan Yurdagüven, Emre Özel, et al.
Dental Materials Journal (2014) Vol. 33, Iss. 6, pp. 757-763
Open Access | Times Cited: 22
Dentin Sealing and Bond Strength Evaluation of Hema-Free and Multi-Mode Adhesives to Biomodified Dentin
Renata Cantanhede Bacelar-Sá, Marcelo Giannini, Gláucia María Bovi Ambrosano, et al.
Brazilian Dental Journal (2017) Vol. 28, Iss. 6, pp. 731-737
Open Access | Times Cited: 20
Do HEMA-free adhesive systems have better clinical performance than HEMA-containing systems in noncarious cervical lesions? A systematic review and meta-analysis
Taíse Sousa Pamplona da Silva, Roberta Fonseca de Castro, Marcela Baraúna Magno, et al.
Journal of Dentistry (2018) Vol. 74, pp. 1-14
Closed Access | Times Cited: 18
Chronological history and current advancements of dental adhesive systems development: a narrative review
Maicon Sebold, Carolina Bosso André, Beatriz Ometto Sahadi, et al.
Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology (2020) Vol. 35, Iss. 18, pp. 1941-1967
Closed Access | Times Cited: 17
Effect of the demineralisation efficacy of MDP utilized on the bonding performance of MDP-based all-in-one adhesives
Kou Fujita, Toru Nikaido, Michael F. Burrow, et al.
Journal of Dentistry (2018) Vol. 77, pp. 59-65
Closed Access | Times Cited: 17
Challenging the Concept that OptiBond FL and Clearfil SE Bond in NCCLs Are Gold Standard Adhesives: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
FDS Dreweck, Adrieli Burey, Marcelo de Oliveira Dreweck, et al.
Operative Dentistry (2021) Vol. 46, Iss. 6, pp. E276-E295
Closed Access | Times Cited: 11
Clinical evaluation of a universal adhesive in non‐carious cervical lesions
Matthew A Rouse, Jaren T. May, Jeffrey A. Platt, et al.
Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry (2020) Vol. 32, Iss. 7, pp. 691-698
Open Access | Times Cited: 12
Effect of the concentration of water in an MDP-based all-in-one adhesive on the efficacy of smear layer removal and on dentin bonding performance
Teshima Masahiro
Dental Materials Journal (2018) Vol. 37, Iss. 4, pp. 685-692
Open Access | Times Cited: 11
Page 1 - Next Page

Scroll to top