Open Access Helper

OpenAlex Citation Counts

OpenAlex Citations Logo

OpenAlex is a bibliographic catalogue of scientific papers, authors and institutions accessible in open access mode, named after the Library of Alexandria. It's citation coverage is excellent and I hope you will find utility in this listing of citing articles!

If you click the article title, you'll navigate to the article, as listed in CrossRef. If you click the Open Access links, you'll navigate to the "best Open Access location". Clicking the citation count will open this listing for that article. Lastly at the bottom of the page, you'll find basic pagination options.

Requested Article:

Assessment of readability, quality and popularity of online information on ureteral stents
Sarah Mozafarpour, Briony Norris, James F. Borin, et al.
World Journal of Urology (2018) Vol. 36, Iss. 6, pp. 985-992
Closed Access | Times Cited: 21

Showing 21 citing articles:

Patient education information material assessment criteria: A scoping review
Khadijeh Ahmadzadeh, Masoud Bahrami, Firoozeh Zare‐Farashbandi, et al.
Health Information & Libraries Journal (2023) Vol. 40, Iss. 1, pp. 3-28
Closed Access | Times Cited: 11
Evaluating breast cancer websites targeting Arabic speakers: empirical investigation of popularity, availability, accessibility, readability, and quality
Zahraa A. Jasem, Zainab AlMeraj, Dari Alhuwail
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making (2022) Vol. 22, Iss. 1
Open Access | Times Cited: 18
Quality of Information About Kidney Stones from Artificial Intelligence Chatbots
David Musheyev, Alexander Pan, Abdo Kabarriti, et al.
Journal of Endourology (2024) Vol. 38, Iss. 10, pp. 1056-1061
Closed Access | Times Cited: 3
Variable Quality and Readability of Patient-oriented Websites on Colorectal Cancer Screening
Eline H. Schreuders, Esmée J. Grobbee, Ernst J. Kuipers, et al.
Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology (2016) Vol. 15, Iss. 1, pp. 79-85.e3
Open Access | Times Cited: 31
Differences in Perceptions of Health Information Between the Public and Health Care Professionals: Nonprobability Sampling Questionnaire Survey
Anat Gesser‐Edelsburg, Nour Abed Elhadi Shahbari, Ricky Cohen, et al.
Journal of Medical Internet Research (2019) Vol. 21, Iss. 7, pp. e14105-e14105
Open Access | Times Cited: 23
Quantitative readability analysis of websites providing information on traumatic brain injury and epilepsy: A need for clear communication
Daniel J. Correa, Lindsey Milano, Churl‐Su Kwon, et al.
Epilepsia (2020) Vol. 61, Iss. 3, pp. 528-538
Open Access | Times Cited: 17
Quality and readability of online patient information on treatment for erectile dysfunction
Trent A. Pattenden, Rachael Raleigh, Elle Pattenden, et al.
BJUI Compass (2021) Vol. 2, Iss. 6, pp. 412-418
Open Access | Times Cited: 14
Readability and Quality of Online Information on Sickle Cell Retinopathy for Patients
Zulfiya Emefa Edugle Gbedemah, Mohammed-Sherrif Napari Fuseini, Sam Kwaku Esson Jonah Fordjuor, et al.
American Journal of Ophthalmology (2023) Vol. 259, pp. 45-52
Closed Access | Times Cited: 5
Analysis of the Patient Information Quality and Readability on Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) on the Internet
Priyanka Priyanka, Yousaf Hadi, Gorman Reynolds
Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology (2018) Vol. 2018, pp. 1-8
Open Access | Times Cited: 12
Men’s health on the web: an analysis of current resources
Jiasian Teh, Joe Wei, Glen Chiang, et al.
World Journal of Urology (2019) Vol. 37, Iss. 6, pp. 1043-1047
Closed Access | Times Cited: 10
Readability and reliability of online patient education materials about statins
Summer Ngo, Roshini Asirvatham, Grayson L. Baird, et al.
American Journal of Preventive Cardiology (2023) Vol. 16, pp. 100594-100594
Open Access | Times Cited: 3
Assessment of online patient education material for eye cancers: A cross-sectional study
Courtney van Ballegooie, Jasmine Wen
PLOS Global Public Health (2023) Vol. 3, Iss. 10, pp. e0001967-e0001967
Open Access | Times Cited: 2
Readability Metrics of Provider Postoperative Handouts in Urology
Fei Lian, Jennifer Lu, Mark White, et al.
Urology (2020) Vol. 146, pp. 49-53
Closed Access | Times Cited: 5
Appraisal of Spanish-Language Google Search Patient Education Resources for Kidney Stones: A Review (Preprint)
Juan Sebastián Arroyave, Mateo Restrepo, Daniel L. Cohen, et al.
(2024)
Closed Access
Impingement on the internet: evaluating the quality and readability of online subacromial impingement information
Christopher Erian, Michael M. A. S. Erian, Sumit Raniga
BMJ Open Sport & Exercise Medicine (2021) Vol. 7, Iss. 4, pp. e001203-e001203
Open Access | Times Cited: 3
Empowerment für unsere Patienten
Johannes Huber, Philipp Karschuck, Christer Groeben, et al.
Der Urologe (2020) Vol. 60, Iss. 1, pp. 45-51
Closed Access | Times Cited: 2
The Internet vs kidney stones: What is the state of online kidney stone prevention information?
Bassel Salka, Nadir El-Saidi, Dawan Naqshabandi, et al.
Research Square (Research Square) (2023)
Open Access
Any Questions? Understanding the Functional Health Literacy in Patients Who Underwent Ureteroscopy
Katelyn A. Spencer, Eric Wahlstedt, Kathleen E. Upton, et al.
Urology (2023) Vol. 183, pp. 39-45
Closed Access
Evaluation of the Accuracy, Credibility, and Readability of Statin-Related Websites: Cross-Sectional Study
Eunice Ling, Domenico de Pieri, Evenne Loh, et al.
Interactive Journal of Medical Research (2023) Vol. 13, pp. e42849-e42849
Open Access
Dando um Google na qualidade das informações sobre cesárea, para leigos, no Brasil em 2018
Beatriz Fioretti Foschi
(2019)
Open Access
The quality of websites regarding statins (Preprint)
Eunice Ling, Domenico de Pieri, Evenne Loh, et al.
(2022)
Open Access
Page 1

Scroll to top