OpenAlex Citation Counts

OpenAlex Citations Logo

OpenAlex is a bibliographic catalogue of scientific papers, authors and institutions accessible in open access mode, named after the Library of Alexandria. It's citation coverage is excellent and I hope you will find utility in this listing of citing articles!

If you click the article title, you'll navigate to the article, as listed in CrossRef. If you click the Open Access links, you'll navigate to the "best Open Access location". Clicking the citation count will open this listing for that article. Lastly at the bottom of the page, you'll find basic pagination options.

Requested Article:

Countering conspiracy theory beliefs: Understanding the conjunction fallacy and considering disconfirming evidence
Lindsay M. Stall, John V. Petrocelli
Applied Cognitive Psychology (2022) Vol. 37, Iss. 2, pp. 266-276
Open Access | Times Cited: 12

Showing 12 citing articles:

Cognitive Biases in Fact-Checking and Their Countermeasures: A Review
Michael Soprano, Kevin Roitero, David La Barbera, et al.
Information Processing & Management (2024) Vol. 61, Iss. 3, pp. 103672-103672
Open Access | Times Cited: 14

Reflection predicts and leads to decreased conspiracy belief
Fatih Bayrak, Vahdet Sümer, Burak Doğruyol, et al.
Cognition (2025) Vol. 258, pp. 106085-106085
Closed Access

Once (but not twice) upon a time: Narrative inoculation against conjunction errors indirectly reduces conspiracy beliefs and improves truth discernment
Mikey Biddlestone, Jon Roozenbeek, Sander van der Linden
Applied Cognitive Psychology (2022) Vol. 37, Iss. 2, pp. 304-318
Open Access | Times Cited: 13

Editorial—The truth is out there: The psychology of conspiracy theories and how to counter them
Sander van der Linden, Briony Swire‐Thompson, Jon Roozenbeek
Applied Cognitive Psychology (2023) Vol. 37, Iss. 2, pp. 252-255
Open Access | Times Cited: 7

The role of cognitive biases in conspiracy beliefs: A literature review
Lorenzo Gagliardi
Journal of Economic Surveys (2023)
Open Access | Times Cited: 7

What is wrong with conspiracy beliefs?
Sinan Alper, Onurcan Yılmaz
Routledge Open Research (2023) Vol. 2, pp. 28-28
Open Access | Times Cited: 6

No evidence that priming analytic thinking reduces belief in conspiracy theories: A Registered Report of high-powered direct replications of Study 2 and Study 4 from
Bojana Većkalov, Vukašin Gligorić, Marija Petrović
Journal of Experimental Social Psychology (2023) Vol. 110, pp. 104549-104549
Open Access | Times Cited: 5

Conspiracy Beliefs and Consumption: The Role of Scientific Literacy
Nathan Allred, Lisa E. Bolton
Journal of Consumer Research (2024) Vol. 51, Iss. 4, pp. 656-678
Closed Access | Times Cited: 1

Believe it or not: A network analysis investigating how individuals embrace false and true statements during COVID-19
Sanguk Lee, Hyesun Choung, Tai‐Quan Peng, et al.
Communication Monographs (2024), pp. 1-26
Open Access | Times Cited: 1

Bullshitting and Bullibility – Conditions and Consequences
John V. Petrocelli, Li Yanying, Enhui Wang, et al.
Social Psychology (2024) Vol. 55, Iss. 5, pp. 262-279
Closed Access

Bullshit can be harmful to your health: Bullibility as a precursor to poor decision--making
John V. Petrocelli, Joseph M. Curran, Lindsay M. Stall
Current Opinion in Psychology (2023) Vol. 55, pp. 101769-101769
Closed Access

Page 1

Scroll to top