Open Access Helper

OpenAlex Citation Counts

OpenAlex Citations Logo

OpenAlex is a bibliographic catalogue of scientific papers, authors and institutions accessible in open access mode, named after the Library of Alexandria. It's citation coverage is excellent and I hope you will find utility in this listing of citing articles!

If you click the article title, you'll navigate to the article, as listed in CrossRef. If you click the Open Access links, you'll navigate to the "best Open Access location". Clicking the citation count will open this listing for that article. Lastly at the bottom of the page, you'll find basic pagination options.

Requested Article:

NASA Faked the Moon Landing—Therefore, (Climate) Science Is a Hoax
Stephan Lewandowsky, Klaus Oberauer, Gilles E. Gignac
Psychological Science (2013) Vol. 24, Iss. 5, pp. 622-633
Closed Access | Times Cited: 561

Showing 26-50 of 561 citing articles:

The conspiracy-effect: Exposure to conspiracy theories (about global warming) decreases pro-social behavior and science acceptance
Sander van der Linden
Personality and Individual Differences (2015) Vol. 87, pp. 171-173
Closed Access | Times Cited: 315
Not All Skepticism Is Equal: Exploring the Ideological Antecedents of Science Acceptance and Rejection
Bastiaan T. Rutjens, Robbie M. Sutton, Romy van der Lee
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin (2017) Vol. 44, Iss. 3, pp. 384-405
Open Access | Times Cited: 312
Collective efficacy increases pro-environmental intentions through increasing self-efficacy
Philipp Jugert, Katharine H. Greenaway, Markus Barth, et al.
Journal of Environmental Psychology (2016) Vol. 48, pp. 12-23
Closed Access | Times Cited: 310
Climate of silence: Pluralistic ignorance as a barrier to climate change discussion
Nathaniel Geiger, Janet K. Swim
Journal of Environmental Psychology (2016) Vol. 47, pp. 79-90
Open Access | Times Cited: 300
Implicit Leadership and Followership Theories “in the wild”: Taking stock of information-processing approaches to leadership and followership in organizational settings
Olga Epitropaki, Thomas Sy, Robin Martin, et al.
The Leadership Quarterly (2013) Vol. 24, Iss. 6, pp. 858-881
Closed Access | Times Cited: 297
Connecting the dots: Illusory pattern perception predicts belief in conspiracies and the supernatural
Jan‐Willem van Prooijen, Karen M. Douglas, Clara De Inocencio
European Journal of Social Psychology (2017) Vol. 48, Iss. 3, pp. 320-335
Open Access | Times Cited: 291
A social trap for the climate? Collective action, trust and climate change risk perception in 35 countries
E. Keith Smith, Adam Mayer
Global Environmental Change (2018) Vol. 49, pp. 140-153
Closed Access | Times Cited: 288
Belief in Fake News is Associated with Delusionality, Dogmatism, Religious Fundamentalism, and Reduced Analytic Thinking
Michael V. Bronstein, Gordon Pennycook, Adam Bear, et al.
Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition (2018) Vol. 8, Iss. 1, pp. 108-117
Open Access | Times Cited: 279
Attitude roots and Jiu Jitsu persuasion: Understanding and overcoming the motivated rejection of science.
Matthew J. Hornsey, Kelly S. Fielding
American Psychologist (2017) Vol. 72, Iss. 5, pp. 459-473
Closed Access | Times Cited: 276
Examining the Relationship Between Conspiracy Theories, Paranormal Beliefs, and Pseudoscience Acceptance Among a University Population
Emilio J. C. Lobato, Jorge L. Mendoza, Valerie K. Sims, et al.
Applied Cognitive Psychology (2014) Vol. 28, Iss. 5, pp. 617-625
Closed Access | Times Cited: 268
A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Psychological Research on Conspiracy Beliefs: Field Characteristics, Measurement Instruments, and Associations With Personality Traits
Andreas Goreis, Martin Voracek
Frontiers in Psychology (2019) Vol. 10
Open Access | Times Cited: 261
The Paranoid Style in American Politics Revisited: An Ideological Asymmetry in Conspiratorial Thinking
Sander van der Linden, Costas Panagopoulos, Flávio Azevedo, et al.
Political Psychology (2020) Vol. 42, Iss. 1, pp. 23-51
Open Access | Times Cited: 253
Text-mining the signals of climate change doubt
Constantine Boussalis, Travis Coan
Global Environmental Change (2015) Vol. 36, pp. 89-100
Open Access | Times Cited: 229
Do I Think BLS Data are BS? The Consequences of Conspiracy Theories
Katherine Levine Einstein, David Glick
Political Behavior (2014) Vol. 37, Iss. 3, pp. 679-701
Closed Access | Times Cited: 217
Understanding (and Reducing) Inaction on Climate Change
Matthew J. Hornsey, Kelly S. Fielding
Social Issues and Policy Review (2019) Vol. 14, Iss. 1, pp. 3-35
Closed Access | Times Cited: 207
Climate Change Disinformation and How to Combat It
Stephan Lewandowsky
Annual Review of Public Health (2020) Vol. 42, Iss. 1, pp. 1-21
Open Access | Times Cited: 204
Populist knowledge: ‘Post-truth’ repertoires of contesting epistemic authorities
Tuukka Ylä-Anttila
European Journal of Cultural and Political Sociology (2018) Vol. 5, Iss. 4, pp. 356-388
Open Access | Times Cited: 200
Epistemic rationality: Skepticism toward unfounded beliefs requires sufficient cognitive ability and motivation to be rational
Tomas Ståhl, Jan‐Willem van Prooijen
Personality and Individual Differences (2017) Vol. 122, pp. 155-163
Open Access | Times Cited: 199
Science Denial Across the Political Divide: Liberals and Conservatives Are Similarly Motivated to Deny Attitude-Inconsistent Science
Anthony N. Washburn, Linda J. Skitka
Social Psychological and Personality Science (2017) Vol. 9, Iss. 8, pp. 972-980
Closed Access | Times Cited: 197
The concomitants of conspiracy concerns
Daniel Freeman, Richard P. Bentall
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology (2017) Vol. 52, Iss. 5, pp. 595-604
Open Access | Times Cited: 195
Reconceptualizing nature‐of‐science education in the age of social media
Dietmar Höttecke, Douglas Allchin
Science Education (2020) Vol. 104, Iss. 4, pp. 641-666
Open Access | Times Cited: 194
From populism to the “plandemic”: why populists believe in COVID-19 conspiracies
Jakob‐Moritz Eberl, Robert Huber, Esther Greussing
Journal of Elections Public Opinion and Parties (2021) Vol. 31, Iss. sup1, pp. 272-284
Open Access | Times Cited: 189
When we are worried, what are we thinking? Anxiety, lack of control, and conspiracy beliefs amidst the COVID‐19 pandemic
Jakub Šrol, Eva Ballová Mikušková, Vladimíra Čavojová
Applied Cognitive Psychology (2021) Vol. 35, Iss. 3, pp. 720-729
Open Access | Times Cited: 186
The Relationship Between Social Media Use and Beliefs in Conspiracy Theories and Misinformation
Adam Enders, Joseph E. Uscinski, Michelle I. Seelig, et al.
Political Behavior (2021) Vol. 45, Iss. 2, pp. 781-804
Open Access | Times Cited: 179
How behavioural sciences can promote truth, autonomy and democratic discourse online
Philipp Lorenz-Spreen, Stephan Lewandowsky, Cass R. Sunstein, et al.
Nature Human Behaviour (2020) Vol. 4, Iss. 11, pp. 1102-1109
Open Access | Times Cited: 178

Scroll to top