Open Access Helper

OpenAlex Citation Counts

OpenAlex Citations Logo

OpenAlex is a bibliographic catalogue of scientific papers, authors and institutions accessible in open access mode, named after the Library of Alexandria. It's citation coverage is excellent and I hope you will find utility in this listing of citing articles!

If you click the article title, you'll navigate to the article, as listed in CrossRef. If you click the Open Access links, you'll navigate to the "best Open Access location". Clicking the citation count will open this listing for that article. Lastly at the bottom of the page, you'll find basic pagination options.

Requested Article:

Expert credibility in climate change
William R. L. Anderegg, James W. Prall, Jacob Harold, et al.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (2010) Vol. 107, Iss. 27, pp. 12107-12109
Open Access | Times Cited: 798

Showing 26-50 of 798 citing articles:

Climate Change Sentiment on Twitter: An Unsolicited Public Opinion Poll
Emily M. Cody, Andrew J. Reagan, Lewis Mitchell, et al.
PLoS ONE (2015) Vol. 10, Iss. 8, pp. e0136092-e0136092
Open Access | Times Cited: 257
What is climate change scepticism? Examination of the concept using a mixed methods study of the UK public
Stuart Capstick, Nicholas Frank Pidgeon
Global Environmental Change (2013) Vol. 24, pp. 389-401
Open Access | Times Cited: 233
Beyond false balance: How interpretive journalism shapes media coverage of climate change
Michael Brüggemann, Sven Engesser
Global Environmental Change (2016) Vol. 42, pp. 58-67
Closed Access | Times Cited: 230
Text-mining the signals of climate change doubt
Constantine Boussalis, Travis Coan
Global Environmental Change (2015) Vol. 36, pp. 89-100
Open Access | Times Cited: 229
Poleward bound: biological impacts of Southern Hemisphere glaciation
Ceridwen I. Fraser, Raisa Nikula, Daniel E. Ruzzante, et al.
Trends in Ecology & Evolution (2012) Vol. 27, Iss. 8, pp. 462-471
Open Access | Times Cited: 225
Cross-national comparison of the presence of climate scepticism in the print media in six countries, 2007–10
James Painter, Teresa Ashe
Environmental Research Letters (2012) Vol. 7, Iss. 4, pp. 044005-044005
Open Access | Times Cited: 225
Role of oxygen, nitrogen and sulfur functionalities on the surface of nanoporous carbons in CO2 adsorption: A critical review
Dipendu Saha, Madeleine J. Kienbaum
Microporous and Mesoporous Materials (2019) Vol. 287, pp. 29-55
Closed Access | Times Cited: 214
Tracking Public Beliefs About Anthropogenic Climate Change
Lawrence C. Hamilton, Joel Hartter, Mary Lemcke‐Stampone, et al.
PLoS ONE (2015) Vol. 10, Iss. 9, pp. e0138208-e0138208
Open Access | Times Cited: 212
How to communicate the scientific consensus on climate change: plain facts, pie charts or metaphors?
Sander van der Linden, Anthony Leiserowitz, Geoffrey Feinberg, et al.
Climatic Change (2014) Vol. 126, Iss. 1-2, pp. 255-262
Closed Access | Times Cited: 199
The Scientific Consensus on Climate Change: How Do We Know We’re Not Wrong?
Наоми Орескес
Springer eBooks (2018), pp. 31-64
Closed Access | Times Cited: 185
Science denial as a form of pseudoscience
Sven Ove Hansson
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A (2017) Vol. 63, pp. 39-47
Closed Access | Times Cited: 184
Seepage: Climate change denial and its effect on the scientific community
Stephan Lewandowsky, Наоми Орескес, James S. Risbey, et al.
Global Environmental Change (2015) Vol. 33, pp. 1-13
Open Access | Times Cited: 182
Cool dudes in Norway: climate change denial among conservative Norwegian men
Olve Krange, Bjørn P. Kaltenborn, Martin Hultman
Environmental Sociology (2018) Vol. 5, Iss. 1, pp. 1-11
Open Access | Times Cited: 161
Resources and Capabilities of Triple Bottom Line Firms: Going Over Old or Breaking New Ground?
Ante Glavas, Jenny Mish
Journal of Business Ethics (2014) Vol. 127, Iss. 3, pp. 623-642
Closed Access | Times Cited: 185
Communicating the science of climate change
Richard C. J. Somerville, Susan Joy Hassol
Physics Today (2011) Vol. 64, Iss. 10, pp. 48-53
Closed Access | Times Cited: 184
Three maps and three misunderstandings: A digital mapping of climate diplomacy
Tommaso Venturini, Nicolas Baya-Laffite, Jean‐Philippe Cointet, et al.
Big Data & Society (2014) Vol. 1, Iss. 2
Open Access | Times Cited: 175
Climate and environmental science denial: A review of the scientific literature published in 1990–2015
Karin Edvardsson Björnberg, Mikael Karlsson, Michael Gilek, et al.
Journal of Cleaner Production (2017) Vol. 167, pp. 229-241
Open Access | Times Cited: 163
Communicating climate change: conduits, content, and consensus
Warren Pearce, Brian Brown, Brigitte Nerlich, et al.
Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Climate Change (2015) Vol. 6, Iss. 6, pp. 613-626
Open Access | Times Cited: 160
Climate change: what it means for us, our children, and our grandchildren
Joseph F.C. DiMento, Pamela Doughman
Choice Reviews Online (2008) Vol. 45, Iss. 07, pp. 45-3846
Closed Access | Times Cited: 158
Echo Chambers of Denial: Explaining User Comments on Climate Change
Stefanie Walter, Michael Brüggemann, Sven Engesser
Environmental Communication (2017) Vol. 12, Iss. 2, pp. 204-217
Closed Access | Times Cited: 147
Considering local adaptation increases willingness to mitigate
Laurel Evans, Taciano L. Milfont, Judy Lawrence
Global Environmental Change (2014) Vol. 25, pp. 69-75
Closed Access | Times Cited: 145
Determinants and Measurement of Climate Change Risk Perception, Worry, and Concern
Sander van der Linden
Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Climate Science (2016)
Closed Access | Times Cited: 144
CO2 capture in lignin-derived and nitrogen-doped hierarchical porous carbons
Dipendu Saha, Scott E. Van Bramer, Gerassimos Orkoulas, et al.
Carbon (2017) Vol. 121, pp. 257-266
Open Access | Times Cited: 143
Do Americans Understand That Global Warming Is Harmful to Human Health? Evidence From a National Survey
Edward Maibach, Jennifer M. Kreslake, Connie Roser‐Renouf, et al.
Annals of Global Health (2015) Vol. 81, Iss. 3, pp. 396-396
Open Access | Times Cited: 140
Optimal operation of an energy hub considering the uncertainty associated with the power consumption of plug-in hybrid electric vehicles using information gap decision theory
Seyed Masoud Moghaddas‐Tafreshi, Morteza Jafari, Soheil Mohseni, et al.
International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems (2019) Vol. 112, pp. 92-108
Open Access | Times Cited: 140

Scroll to top