Open Access Helper

OpenAlex Citation Counts

OpenAlex Citations Logo

OpenAlex is a bibliographic catalogue of scientific papers, authors and institutions accessible in open access mode, named after the Library of Alexandria. It's citation coverage is excellent and I hope you will find utility in this listing of citing articles!

If you click the article title, you'll navigate to the article, as listed in CrossRef. If you click the Open Access links, you'll navigate to the "best Open Access location". Clicking the citation count will open this listing for that article. Lastly at the bottom of the page, you'll find basic pagination options.

Requested Article:

Multiple ecosystem services provision and biomass logistics management in bioenergy buffers: A state-of-the-art review
Andrea Ferrarini, Paolo Serra, María Almagro, et al.
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews (2017) Vol. 73, pp. 277-290
Closed Access | Times Cited: 82

Showing 26-50 of 82 citing articles:

Positive water linkages of producing short rotation poplars and willows for bioenergy and phytotechnologies
Ronald S. Zalesny, Göran Berndes, Ioannis Dimitriou, et al.
Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Energy and Environment (2019) Vol. 8, Iss. 5
Open Access | Times Cited: 33
Belowground biomass C outweighs soil organic C of perennial energy crops: Insights from a long‐term multispecies trial
Enrico Martani, Andrea Ferrarini, Paolo Serra, et al.
GCB Bioenergy (2020) Vol. 13, Iss. 3, pp. 459-472
Open Access | Times Cited: 27
Building Material and the Climate: Constructing a New Future

(2023)
Open Access | Times Cited: 9
Environmental sustainability of the biogas pathway in Italy through the methodology of the Global Bioenergy Partnership
Tiziana Pirelli, Alessandro Chiumenti, Maria Michela Morese, et al.
Journal of Cleaner Production (2021) Vol. 318, pp. 128483-128483
Closed Access | Times Cited: 22
Strategic deployment of riparian buffers and windbreaks in Europe can co-deliver biomass and environmental benefits
Oskar Englund, P BORJESSON, Blas Mola‐Yudego, et al.
Communications Earth & Environment (2021) Vol. 2, Iss. 1
Open Access | Times Cited: 21
Life cycle assessment of a short-rotation coppice willow riparian buffer strip for farm nutrient mitigation and renewable energy production
David M. Livingstone, Beatrice Smyth, G. Lyons, et al.
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews (2022) Vol. 158, pp. 112154-112154
Open Access | Times Cited: 15
Site impacts nutrient translocation efficiency in intraspecies and interspecies miscanthus hybrids on marginal lands
Elena Magenau, J. C. Brown, Danny Awty‐Carroll, et al.
GCB Bioenergy (2022) Vol. 14, Iss. 9, pp. 1035-1054
Open Access | Times Cited: 15
Taking Stock of Land Use Conflict Research: A Systematic Map with Special Focus on Conceptual Approaches
Meike Fienitz
Society & Natural Resources (2023) Vol. 36, Iss. 6, pp. 715-732
Open Access | Times Cited: 8
Combining bioenergy and nature conservation: An example in wetlands
Indrek Melts, Mari Ivask, Geetha Mohan, et al.
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews (2019) Vol. 111, pp. 293-302
Open Access | Times Cited: 25
Room at the margins for energy-crops? A qualitative analysis of stakeholder views on the use of marginal land for biomass production in Denmark
Orla Shortall, Helle Tegnér Anker, Peter Sandøe, et al.
Biomass and Bioenergy (2019) Vol. 123, pp. 51-58
Closed Access | Times Cited: 23
Perennial rhizomatous grasses: Can they really increase species richness and abundance in arable land?—A meta‐analysis
Jan Lask, Elena Magenau, Andrea Ferrarini, et al.
GCB Bioenergy (2020) Vol. 12, Iss. 11, pp. 968-978
Open Access | Times Cited: 23
High C input by perennial energy crops boosts belowground functioning and increases soil organic P content
Andrea Ferrarini, Enrico Martani, Flavio Fornasier, et al.
Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment (2020) Vol. 308, pp. 107247-107247
Closed Access | Times Cited: 23
Biomass Production and Nutrient Removal by Perennial Energy Grasses Produced on a Wet Marginal Land
Danielle Cooney, Nictor Namoi, Colleen Zumpf, et al.
BioEnergy Research (2022) Vol. 16, Iss. 2, pp. 886-897
Open Access | Times Cited: 12
Predicting Biomass Yields of Advanced Switchgrass Cultivars for Bioenergy and Ecosystem Services Using Machine Learning
Jules Cacho, Jeremy Feinstein, Colleen Zumpf, et al.
Energies (2023) Vol. 16, Iss. 10, pp. 4168-4168
Open Access | Times Cited: 7
Towards Managing Biodiversity of European Marginal Agricultural Land for Biodiversity-Friendly Biomass Production
Anna Burland, Moritz von Cossel
Agronomy (2023) Vol. 13, Iss. 6, pp. 1651-1651
Open Access | Times Cited: 7
Upscaling miscanthus production in the United Kingdom: The benefits, challenges, and trade‐offs
Edward Hodgson, Jon McCalmont, Rebecca Rowe, et al.
GCB Bioenergy (2024) Vol. 16, Iss. 8
Open Access | Times Cited: 2
Geospatial supply–demand modeling of biomass residues for co‐firing in European coal power plants
Olivia Cintas, Göran Berndes, Oskar Englund, et al.
GCB Bioenergy (2018) Vol. 10, Iss. 11, pp. 786-803
Open Access | Times Cited: 23
Willow coppice in intensive agricultural applications to reduce strain on the food-energy-water nexus
David M. Livingstone, Beatrice Smyth, Aoife Foley, et al.
Biomass and Bioenergy (2020) Vol. 144, pp. 105903-105903
Open Access | Times Cited: 20
Effect of Urban fringes green space fragmentation on ecosystem service value
Yingying Guan, Xueming Li, Songbo Li, et al.
PLoS ONE (2022) Vol. 17, Iss. 2, pp. e0263452-e0263452
Open Access | Times Cited: 11
Biomass production from neglected and underutilized tall perennial grasses on marginal lands in India: a brief review
Kripal Singh, Ashutosh Awasthi, Suresh K. Sharma, et al.
Energy Ecology and Environment (2018) Vol. 3, Iss. 4, pp. 207-215
Closed Access | Times Cited: 20
Energy analysis of poplar production for bioenergy in Sweden
Maria Nordborg, Göran Berndes, Ioannis Dimitriou, et al.
Biomass and Bioenergy (2018) Vol. 112, pp. 110-120
Closed Access | Times Cited: 19
Influence of cutting height on biomass yield and quality of miscanthus genotypes
Elena Magenau, Andreas Kiesel, J. C. Brown, et al.
GCB Bioenergy (2021) Vol. 13, Iss. 10, pp. 1675-1689
Open Access | Times Cited: 15
Large‐scale deployment of grass in crop rotations as a multifunctional climate mitigation strategy
Oskar Englund, Blas Mola‐Yudego, Pål Börjesson, et al.
GCB Bioenergy (2022) Vol. 15, Iss. 2, pp. 166-184
Open Access | Times Cited: 10
Can upstream biofuel production increase the flow of downstream ecosystem goods and services?
Henriëtte I. Jager, Rebecca A. Efroymson
Biomass and Bioenergy (2017) Vol. 114, pp. 125-131
Open Access | Times Cited: 17
Lignocellulosic‐based bioenergy and water quality parameters: a review
Bharat Sharma Acharya, Humberto Blanco‐Canqui
GCB Bioenergy (2018) Vol. 10, Iss. 8, pp. 504-533
Open Access | Times Cited: 16

Scroll to top