Open Access Helper

OpenAlex Citation Counts

OpenAlex Citations Logo

OpenAlex is a bibliographic catalogue of scientific papers, authors and institutions accessible in open access mode, named after the Library of Alexandria. It's citation coverage is excellent and I hope you will find utility in this listing of citing articles!

If you click the article title, you'll navigate to the article, as listed in CrossRef. If you click the Open Access links, you'll navigate to the "best Open Access location". Clicking the citation count will open this listing for that article. Lastly at the bottom of the page, you'll find basic pagination options.

Requested Article:

Birds of a feather are persuaded together: Perceived source credibility mediates the effect of political bias on misinformation susceptibility
Cecilie S. Traberg, Sander van der Linden
Personality and Individual Differences (2021) Vol. 185, pp. 111269-111269
Closed Access | Times Cited: 83

Showing 26-50 of 83 citing articles:

Why are social media users susceptible to health misinformation? A perspective from complexity theory
Zuying Mo, Yiming Guo, Daqing Pan
Aslib Journal of Information Management (2024)
Closed Access | Times Cited: 3
Which Linguistic Cues Make People Fall for Fake News? A Comparison of Cognitive and Affective Processing
Bernhard Lutz, Marc T. P. Adam, Stefan Feuerriegel, et al.
Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction (2024) Vol. 8, Iss. CSCW1, pp. 1-22
Open Access | Times Cited: 3
“I feel it in my gut:” Epistemic motivations, political beliefs, and misperceptions of COVID-19 and the 2020 U.S. presidential election
Dannagal G. Young, Erin K. Maloney, Amy Bleakley, et al.
Journal of Social and Political Psychology (2022) Vol. 10, Iss. 2, pp. 643-656
Open Access | Times Cited: 15
Accuracy and Social Motivations Shape Judgements of (Mis)Information
Steve Rathje, Jon Roozenbeek, Jay Joseph Van Bavel, et al.
(2022)
Open Access | Times Cited: 12
Combining refutations and social norms increases belief change
Ullrich K. H. Ecker, Jasmyne A. Sanderson, Paul McIlhiney, et al.
Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology (2022) Vol. 76, Iss. 6, pp. 1275-1297
Open Access | Times Cited: 12
How to “inoculate” against multimodal misinformation: A conceptual replication of Roozenbeek and van der Linden (2020)
Julian H Neylan, Mikey Biddlestone, Jon Roozenbeek, et al.
Scientific Reports (2023) Vol. 13, Iss. 1
Open Access | Times Cited: 7
Susceptibility to Online Misinformation: A Systematic Meta-Analysis of Demographic and Psychological Factors
Mubashir Sultan, Alan Novaes Tump, Nina Ehmann, et al.
(2024)
Open Access | Times Cited: 2
Susceptibility to Unreliable Information Sources: Swift Adoption with Minimal Exposure
Jinyi Ye, Luca Luceri, Julie Jiang, et al.
Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2022 (2024), pp. 4674-4685
Open Access | Times Cited: 2
Diverse misinformation: impacts of human biases on detection of deepfakes on networks
Juniper Lovato, Jonathan St-Onge, Randall Harp, et al.
Deleted Journal (2024) Vol. 1, Iss. 1
Open Access | Times Cited: 2
Don’t believe them! Reducing misinformation influence through source discreditation
Ullrich K. H. Ecker, Toby Prike, Antonia B. Paver, et al.
Cognitive Research Principles and Implications (2024) Vol. 9, Iss. 1
Open Access | Times Cited: 2
People who have more science education rely less on misinformation—Even if they do not necessarily follow the health recommendations
Yael Rozenblum, Keren Dalyot, Ayelet Baram‐Tsabari
Journal of Research in Science Teaching (2024)
Open Access | Times Cited: 2
Twitter’s Disputed Tags May Be Ineffective at Reducing Belief in Fake News and Only Reduce Intentions to Share Fake News Among Democrats and Independents
Jeffrey Martin Lees, Abigail McCarter, Dawn M. Sarno
Journal of Online Trust and Safety (2022) Vol. 1, Iss. 3
Open Access | Times Cited: 12
Partisan conflict over content moderation is more than disagreement about facts
Ruth E. Appel, Jennifer Pan, Margaret E. Roberts
Science Advances (2023) Vol. 9, Iss. 44
Open Access | Times Cited: 5
Don’t Believe Them! Reducing Misinformation Influence Through Source Discreditation
Ullrich K. H. Ecker, Toby Prike, Antonia B. Paver, et al.
(2024)
Open Access | Times Cited: 1
To whom do people reply in comment sections? Effects of attitude (un)congeniality, age, confidence, and knowledge
Jürgen Buder, Nadia Said
New Media & Society (2024)
Open Access | Times Cited: 1
Community notes increase trust in fact-checking on social media
Chiara Patricia Drolsbach, Kirill Solovev, Nicolas Pröllochs
(2024)
Open Access | Times Cited: 1
Gamified inoculation reduces susceptibility to misinformation from political ingroups
Cecilie S. Traberg, Jon Roozenbeek, Sander van der Linden
(2024)
Open Access | Times Cited: 1
Virtual lab coats: The effects of verified source information on social media post credibility
Jorrit Geels, Paul Graßl, Hanna Schraffenberger, et al.
PLoS ONE (2024) Vol. 19, Iss. 5, pp. e0302323-e0302323
Open Access | Times Cited: 1
Partisans are more likely to entrench their beliefs in misinformation when political outgroup members correct claims
Diego A. Reinero, Elizabeth Ann Harris, Steve Rathje, et al.
(2023)
Open Access | Times Cited: 4
Distractions, analytical thinking and falling for fake news: A survey of psychological factors
Adrian Kwek, Luke Peh, Josef Tan, et al.
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications (2023) Vol. 10, Iss. 1
Open Access | Times Cited: 4
Prebunking Against Misinformation in the Modern Digital Age
Cecilie S. Traberg, Trisha Harjani, Melisa Basol, et al.
Springer eBooks (2023), pp. 99-111
Closed Access | Times Cited: 4
Do people believe in misleading information disseminated via memes? The role of identity and anger
María D. Molina
New Media & Society (2023)
Closed Access | Times Cited: 4
Meta-perception and misinformation
Sean Bogart, Jeffrey Martin Lees
Current Opinion in Psychology (2023) Vol. 54, pp. 101717-101717
Open Access | Times Cited: 4
Partisan Conflict Over Content Moderation Is More Than Disagreement about Facts
Ruth E. Appel, Jennifer Pan, Margaret E. Roberts
SSRN Electronic Journal (2023)
Closed Access | Times Cited: 3
The intentions of information sources can affect what information people think qualifies as true
Isaac J. Handley-Miner, Michael T. Pope, Richard Kenneth Atkins, et al.
Scientific Reports (2023) Vol. 13, Iss. 1
Open Access | Times Cited: 3

Scroll to top