OpenAlex Citation Counts

OpenAlex Citations Logo

OpenAlex is a bibliographic catalogue of scientific papers, authors and institutions accessible in open access mode, named after the Library of Alexandria. It's citation coverage is excellent and I hope you will find utility in this listing of citing articles!

If you click the article title, you'll navigate to the article, as listed in CrossRef. If you click the Open Access links, you'll navigate to the "best Open Access location". Clicking the citation count will open this listing for that article. Lastly at the bottom of the page, you'll find basic pagination options.

Requested Article:

Many Labs 3: Evaluating participant pool quality across the academic semester via replication
Charles R. Ebersole, Olivia E. Atherton, Aimee L. Belanger, et al.
Journal of Experimental Social Psychology (2016) Vol. 67, pp. 68-82
Open Access | Times Cited: 425

Showing 26-50 of 425 citing articles:

Scientific Utopia III: Crowdsourcing Science
Eric Luis Uhlmann, Charles R. Ebersole, Christopher R. Chartier, et al.
Perspectives on Psychological Science (2019) Vol. 14, Iss. 5, pp. 711-733
Open Access | Times Cited: 146

Challenges for assessing replicability in preclinical cancer biology
Timothy M. Errington, Alexandria Denis, Nicole Perfito, et al.
eLife (2021) Vol. 10
Open Access | Times Cited: 112

The Benefits, Barriers, and Risks of Big-Team Science
Patrick S. Forscher, Eric‐Jan Wagenmakers, Nicholas A. Coles, et al.
Perspectives on Psychological Science (2022) Vol. 18, Iss. 3, pp. 607-623
Open Access | Times Cited: 87

Citation counts and journal impact factors do not capture some indicators of research quality in the behavioural and brain sciences
Michael R. Dougherty, Zachary Horne
Royal Society Open Science (2022) Vol. 9, Iss. 8
Open Access | Times Cited: 79

A discipline-wide investigation of the replicability of Psychology papers over the past two decades
Wu Youyou, Yang Yang, Brian Uzzi
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (2023) Vol. 120, Iss. 6
Open Access | Times Cited: 60

The replication crisis has led to positive structural, procedural, and community changes
Max Korbmacher, Flávio Azevedo, Charlotte R. Pennington, et al.
Communications Psychology (2023) Vol. 1, Iss. 1
Open Access | Times Cited: 44

High replicability of newly discovered social-behavioural findings is achievable
John Protzko, Jon A. Krosnick, Leif D. Nelson, et al.
Nature Human Behaviour (2023) Vol. 8, Iss. 2, pp. 311-319
Open Access | Times Cited: 41

Exposing omitted moderators: Explaining why effect sizes differ in the social sciences
Antonia Krefeld-Schwalb, Eli Sugerman, Eric J. Johnson
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (2024) Vol. 121, Iss. 12
Open Access | Times Cited: 21

Reproducible research in sport and exercise psychology: The role of sample sizes
Geoffrey Schweizer, Philip Furley
Psychology of sport and exercise (2015) Vol. 23, pp. 114-122
Closed Access | Times Cited: 152

Evaluating the replicability of social science experiments in Nature and Science between 2010 and 2015
Colin F. Camerer, Anna Dreber, Felix Holzmeister, et al.
(2018)
Open Access | Times Cited: 152

The role of metaphor in communication and thought
Paul H. Thibodeau, Teenie Matlock, Stephen J. Flusberg
Language and Linguistics Compass (2019) Vol. 13, Iss. 5
Closed Access | Times Cited: 128

Philosophy of science and the replicability crisis
Felipe Romero
Philosophy Compass (2019) Vol. 14, Iss. 11
Open Access | Times Cited: 119

Replication Bayes factors from evidence updating
Alexander Ly, Alexander Etz, Maarten Marsman, et al.
Behavior Research Methods (2018) Vol. 51, Iss. 6, pp. 2498-2508
Open Access | Times Cited: 118

The state of social and personality science: Rotten to the core, not so bad, getting better, or getting worse?
Matt Motyl, Alexander P. Demos, Timothy S Carsel, et al.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (2017) Vol. 113, Iss. 1, pp. 34-58
Closed Access | Times Cited: 115

The pipeline project: Pre-publication independent replications of a single laboratory's research pipeline
Martin Schweinsberg, Nikhil Madan, Michelangelo Vianello, et al.
Journal of Experimental Social Psychology (2016) Vol. 66, pp. 55-67
Open Access | Times Cited: 114

Promoting Open Science to Increase the Trustworthiness of Evidence in Special Education
Bryan G. Cook, John Wills Lloyd, David Thomas Mellor, et al.
Exceptional Children (2018) Vol. 85, Iss. 1, pp. 104-118
Open Access | Times Cited: 111

Same data, different conclusions: Radical dispersion in empirical results when independent analysts operationalize and test the same hypothesis
Martin Schweinsberg, Michael B. Feldman, Nicola Staub, et al.
Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes (2021) Vol. 165, pp. 228-249
Open Access | Times Cited: 102

Heterogeneity of Research Results: A New Perspective From Which to Assess and Promote Progress in Psychological Science
Audrey Linden, Johannes Hönekopp
Perspectives on Psychological Science (2021) Vol. 16, Iss. 2, pp. 358-376
Open Access | Times Cited: 99

Replication is important for educational psychology: Recent developments and key issues
Jonathan A. Plucker, Matthew C. Makel
Educational Psychologist (2021) Vol. 56, Iss. 2, pp. 90-100
Open Access | Times Cited: 99

#EEGManyLabs: Investigating the replicability of influential EEG experiments
Yuri G. Pavlov, Nika Adamian, Stefan Appelhoff, et al.
Cortex (2021) Vol. 144, pp. 213-229
Open Access | Times Cited: 96

Replicability, Robustness, and Reproducibility in Psychological Science
Brian A. Nosek, Tom E Hardwicke, Hannah Moshontz, et al.
(2021)
Open Access | Times Cited: 88

Replications in Comparative Cognition: What Should We Expect and How Can We Improve?
Benjamin Farrar, Markus Boeckle, Nicola S. Clayton
Animal Behavior and Cognition (2020) Vol. 7, Iss. 1, pp. 1-22
Open Access | Times Cited: 86

The Psychological Science Accelerator: Advancing Psychology through a Distributed Collaborative Network
Hannah Moshontz, Lorne Campbell, Charles R. Ebersole, et al.
(2018)
Open Access | Times Cited: 83

99% impossible: A valid, or falsifiable, internal meta-analysis.
Joachim Vosgerau, Uri Simonsohn, Leif D. Nelson, et al.
Journal of Experimental Psychology General (2019) Vol. 148, Iss. 9, pp. 1628-1639
Closed Access | Times Cited: 82

Coarticulation and learnability of transparent vowels in vowel harmony
Sara Finley
Proceedings of the Linguistic Society of America (2021) Vol. 6, Iss. 1, pp. 92-92
Open Access | Times Cited: 82

Scroll to top