Open Access Helper

OpenAlex Citation Counts

OpenAlex Citations Logo

OpenAlex is a bibliographic catalogue of scientific papers, authors and institutions accessible in open access mode, named after the Library of Alexandria. It's citation coverage is excellent and I hope you will find utility in this listing of citing articles!

If you click the article title, you'll navigate to the article, as listed in CrossRef. If you click the Open Access links, you'll navigate to the "best Open Access location". Clicking the citation count will open this listing for that article. Lastly at the bottom of the page, you'll find basic pagination options.

Requested Article:

Metacognitive Failure as a Feature of Those Holding Radical Beliefs
Max Rollwage, Raymond J. Dolan, Stephen M. Fleming
Current Biology (2018) Vol. 28, Iss. 24, pp. 4014-4021.e8
Open Access | Times Cited: 178

Showing 26-50 of 178 citing articles:

The Influence of Political Ideology on Fake News Belief: The Portuguese Case
João Pedro Baptista, Elisete Correia, Anabela Gradim, et al.
Publications (2021) Vol. 9, Iss. 2, pp. 23-23
Open Access | Times Cited: 34
Humans actively sample evidence to support prior beliefs
Paula Kaanders, Pradyumna Sepúlveda, Tomas Folke, et al.
eLife (2022) Vol. 11
Open Access | Times Cited: 23
Learning with certainty in childhood
Carolyn Baer, Celeste Kidd
Trends in Cognitive Sciences (2022) Vol. 26, Iss. 10, pp. 887-896
Open Access | Times Cited: 23
Political reinforcement learners
Lion Schulz, Rahul Bhui
Trends in Cognitive Sciences (2024) Vol. 28, Iss. 3, pp. 210-222
Open Access | Times Cited: 5
Clarifying the Structure and Nature of Left-Wing Authoritarianism
Thomas H. Costello, Shauna M. Bowes, Sean T. Stevens, et al.
(2020)
Open Access | Times Cited: 38
Closed-minded cognition: Right-wing authoritarianism is negatively related to belief updating following prediction error
Alyssa Hannah Sinclair, Matthew L. Stanley, Paul Seli
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review (2020) Vol. 27, Iss. 6, pp. 1348-1361
Open Access | Times Cited: 35
A comparison of extreme religious and political ideologies: Similar worldviews but different grievances
Jan‐Willem van Prooijen, Sophia M.H.C. Kuijper
Personality and Individual Differences (2020) Vol. 159, pp. 109888-109888
Open Access | Times Cited: 34
Cognition and Emotion in Extreme Political Action: Individual Differences and Dynamic Interactions
Leor Zmigrod, Amit Goldenberg
Current Directions in Psychological Science (2021) Vol. 30, Iss. 3, pp. 218-227
Open Access | Times Cited: 30
Metacognitive resources for adaptive learning⋆
Aurelio Cortese
Neuroscience Research (2021) Vol. 178, pp. 10-19
Open Access | Times Cited: 30
The polarized mind in context: Interdisciplinary approaches to the psychology of political polarization.
Jeroen M. van Baar, Oriel FeldmanHall
American Psychologist (2021) Vol. 77, Iss. 3, pp. 394-408
Open Access | Times Cited: 29
The Effect of Prediction Error on Belief Update Across the Political Spectrum
Madalina Vlasceanu, Michael J. Morais, Alin Coman
Psychological Science (2021) Vol. 32, Iss. 6, pp. 916-933
Open Access | Times Cited: 27
Why metacognition matters in politically contested domains
Helen Fischer, Stephen M. Fleming
Trends in Cognitive Sciences (2024) Vol. 28, Iss. 9, pp. 783-785
Open Access | Times Cited: 4
Intellectual humility links to metacognitive ability
Helen Fischer, Astrid Kause, Markus Huff
Personality and Individual Differences (2025) Vol. 238, pp. 113028-113028
Closed Access
Restoring Trust in Public Institutions
Guglielmo Briscese, Maddalena Grignani
(2025)
Closed Access
Selektive Integration überzeugungskongruenter Informationen
Tobias Kube
Psychologische Rundschau (2025)
Closed Access
Early Emergence of Metacognition in Rhesus Monkeys
Yiyun Huang, Alexandra G. Rosati
Developmental Science (2025) Vol. 28, Iss. 3
Open Access
I know better! Emerging metacognition allows adolescents to ignore false advice
Madeleine E. Moses‐Payne, Johanna Habicht, Aislinn Bowler, et al.
Developmental Science (2021) Vol. 24, Iss. 5
Open Access | Times Cited: 25
Contested science: Individuals with higher metacognitive insight into interpretation of evidence are less likely to polarize
Nadia Said, Helen Fischer, Gerrit Anders
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review (2021) Vol. 29, Iss. 2, pp. 668-680
Open Access | Times Cited: 24
Modelling Speed-Accuracy Tradeoffs in the Stopping Rule for Confidence Judgments
Stef Herregods, Pierre Le Denmat, Kobe Desender
bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (2023)
Open Access | Times Cited: 10
Democrats are better than Republicans at discerning true and false news but do not have better metacognitive awareness
Mitch Dobbs, Joseph DeGutis, Jorge Morales, et al.
Communications Psychology (2023) Vol. 1, Iss. 1
Open Access | Times Cited: 10
A social inference model of idealization and devaluation.
Giles W. Story, Ryan Smith, Michael Moutoussis, et al.
Psychological Review (2023) Vol. 131, Iss. 3, pp. 749-780
Open Access | Times Cited: 9
Insight in the Conspiracist’s Mind
Sander Van de Cruys, Jo Bervoets, Stephen Gadsby, et al.
Personality and Social Psychology Review (2023) Vol. 28, Iss. 3, pp. 302-324
Open Access | Times Cited: 9
Political Ideology and Attitudinal Ambivalence: Investigating the Role of Ideological Extremity
Axel M. Burger
Social Psychological and Personality Science (2024)
Open Access | Times Cited: 3
Thinking about Believing: Can Metacognitive Reflection Encourage Belief Updating?
Allison O'Leary, Wesley Fletcher
Journal of Intelligence (2024) Vol. 12, Iss. 5, pp. 47-47
Open Access | Times Cited: 3
Postdecision Evidence Integration and Depressive Symptoms
Madeleine E. Moses‐Payne, Max Rollwage, Stephen M. Fleming, et al.
Frontiers in Psychiatry (2019) Vol. 10
Open Access | Times Cited: 29

Scroll to top